patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch.
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Latest Teacher Talks Fail To Produce Agreement

Strike by Lake Forest High School teachers could start Wednesday if no agreement is reached.

 

No agreement was reached during two hours of contract negotiations tonight between the Lake Forest High School District 115 Board of Education and the Lake Forest Education Association (LFEA) teachers’ union.

With both sides unable to agree on a date for another negotiation session with a federal mediator, the prospect of a strike at 12:01 a.m. Wednesday is getting closer to reality.

Earlier: LFHS Teachers Issue Strike Notice for Sept. 12

The union is willing to meet with the Board Tuesday, according to spokesperson Chuck Gress. The District has offered to continue negotiations Monday, according to Board President Sharon Golan.

“We met and we did not reach an agreement,” Golan said. “We have offered to meet Monday and we are waiting to hear back.”

Gress claims the Board rejected the offer to continue negotiations Tuesday, “The LFEA offered to meet with the Board on Tuesday at any time after the close of the school day,” he said. “The Board refused.”

After the teachers declared an impasse August 10, both sides were required to make their last and final offer to each other public August 24. According to Gress, there was no movement by the Board from that position tonight.

“The LFEA is sorry to report that the District 115 Board of Education did not make any new offers during two hours of mediated negotiations this evening,” Gress said. “However, the teachers remain hopeful that a fair and equitable contract can be reached.”

Golan has previously indicated the Board has a plan in the event of a strike but has yet to make any details public. That could change soon. “I believe we will start to get some information out tomorrow,” she said. She suggested the best place to look will be the school’s website.

The teachers have also started a website to provide information to the public.

For more news and updates from Lake Forest-Lake Bluff Patch, subscribe to our daily e-newsletter, ”Like” us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Related Topics: Board Teacher Negotiations, Lake Forest Education Association, Lake Forest High School, and teacher strike

Lcpfeifer

9:18 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Teachers. You may leave. There are plenty of qualified Candidates w Master's degrees that would happily fill your posts. Our economy. Our taxes. All in an uneven tester totter do not allow you to demand more. Get w the Nation and suck it up.

Reply

Bob

9:43 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Teachers get real! Take the offer and wait for the economy to get better.

Reply

RationalTht

10:48 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

So, the board wanted to meet on Monday after school, giving another day. The teachers want to wait until the last possible moments to start negotiating again - probably because they think it will put more "pressure" on the board. Hopefully the board stays strong and respects the taxpayers of LF that have been suffering. It is time for the teachers to take the same hit the rest of us have.

Reply

Nanbrank

1:56 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Teachers...stay strong. The few that post here are not the voice of the community. You deserve an equitable contract. Hang tight.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Life is Good

7:02 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Nanbrank: Perhaps you didn't read the article on the Patch: Citizen Concern for Teacher Strike Remains Low
There are more than just a few people that are sick and tired of their antics.

Comment_arrow

Me

9:24 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Teachers...Nanbrank is telling you that you should play with fire. Remember what your parents told you about that. It could backfire.

Comment_arrow

Lynette Paulson

5:20 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

@Nanbrank it saddens me how out of touch you are with society. I have some good advice for you: Check your self before you wreck your self.

marco sangria

6:57 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

As i said before hogs get slaughtered. Good shout Nanbrank but you forgot to include your union card.

Reply

Local resident

9:26 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Our children have been educated in the local schools, and in general, it has been a good experience. The teachers have been good - and the additional resources the local children have (significant parent involvement, outside instruction) have also contributed to this success. For that reason, in a normal economy, I would be strongly supportive of the teachers receiving the salary increases they are seeking. HOWEVER, with the State of Illinois currently ranking 49/50 in solvency and short billions of dollars for pensions, we simply cannot afford it! If Madigan and his "handpicked candidates" get into office in November - we can count on their threats of returning those liabilities to our local school districts. Many of our district teachers are retiring in the short-term - and we are going to be hit hard and quick. So - if our school district does have a small surplus, I'm one of many residents that hope we are holding it for that likely scenario. Relative to their peers in the surrounding communities, the salaries of our teachers are very competitive.

And to the Lake Forest teachers that are currently involved in this - many of you are very important to us- and we count you as our friends, neighbors, and family......I can imagine it would be difficult to not take this personal. But know that it is not. The Board knows that the majority of the residents support their decision to not budge - and I believe your union leadership is not acting in your best interests.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shirley

11:38 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

You have stated the situation so clearly and compassionately. Thank you.

Gary

9:27 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

For those who are just joining the action, here is some background information you will need to decide where you stand:

The school board's position regarding the two offers: http://www.lfhs.org

"The Board of Education's proposal includes a competitive average annual increase in compensation of 3.6 percent."
"When the salary step cost, base salary increase, stipends, and interest payments, are added together, the LFEA is proposing annual salary increases of 5.6%, 6.5%, and a final year increase of between 4.76-6.57%"
"The Board of Education is disappointed in both the LFEA’s action in publicly releasing their proposal and in the proposal itself. We feel that the LFEA proposal is highly irresponsible in the current economic environment and that it is inconsistent with current market conditions."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patrick

5:51 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Gary, the board is asking teachers to pay more for their health and dental benefits. Do you happen to know how these numbers impact the 3.6% increased cited above? It's not really a 3.6% increase if you look at the whole package. The board's proposal is not clear on these numbers. For example, it says that teachers will pay 10% more of the cost for the "HMO Family" option. How does this translate to percent of salary? I don't know, but it's important to look at all of the facts, not just the facts that support one side of the argument.

Comment_arrow

David Greenberg

9:29 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Why does it matter how much increased payments for health and dental benefits affect teachers? There's nothing saying that if the cost for health/dental benefits goes up that the District must pay the teachers more just because they're going to pay more out of pocket.

Personally, I'd let the employee pay for 100% of their own health and dental benefits, and the only reason the District would be involved would be to get a better group rate. I'd let Families pay 90% of their own health/dental benefits.

These teachers are making good salaries now. I'd give them a ZERO automatic step raise, zero automatic lane change raise. If and only if they hit their targets for performance would they qualify to be CONSIDERED for a raise. Such a raise would come out of a fixed pool of money, and some considered might not get one even if others did - just like in the private sector.

If they want to go on strike - let them. The minute they do, put an ad in the paper seeking replacements. Per a recent ISBE report - there's 60,000 teachers in the pipeline. Certainly some out of that 60,000 will be able to do the job, perhaps even better than the incumbents, and at a cost the Board and taxpayers want to fund.

Gary

9:28 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Information regarding our competitiveness in attracting top talent (in my opinion, an invalid gauge of how top talent is attracted, cultivated, and maintained, but people seem to care so here it is):

http://www.lfhs.org/board/LFHS_BOE_Proposal.pdf

"District Teacher Compensation Comparatives
In regard to teacher compensation, in August of 2012 the Chicago Sun-Times
reported that Lake Forest High School’s 2011-2012 teacher salaries were among
the highest in the state. (See chart.)
• LFHS Beginning Bachelor and Beginning Masters salaries ranked
in the top 2%
• LFHS Top Masters and Highest Salary ranked in the top 1%
Additionally, in November of 2011, the Chicago Tribune reported that Lake Forest
High School had the SECOND HIGHEST AVERAGE TEACHER SALARY in the state of Illinois.
While this is due to a combination of teacher experience, education, and salary
schedule compensation, it highlights the fact that the district has been able to
attract, retain, and reward an educated and experienced staff."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patrick

9:10 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

How do the salaries of our teachers compare to other North Shore schools? This is a better question. We must be able to compete in this market. LFHS salaries are not at the top; many other schools in our area pay more. Look at their numbers. The salaries for our teachers must be competitive to attract the best talent.

Also, as you point out, the reason the average salary is high is because we have a lot of experienced teachers, most of whom are excellent. This will change when many of them retire over the next few years. It's cyclic. By the way, Deerfield and Highland Park are in the same situation. And they don't have a teacher's union!

Comment_arrow

Gary

5:27 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Patrick,
So go ahead and make the case that our teachers deserve to get what they asking for in this disastrous economy.

Please state a sane reason for why our teachers should be ripping this town apart when they are already offered pay raises. What could justify doing this to our children?

It's funny, but people keep disappearing after I ask that question.

Well...............................we're waiting...............again.

Joe

10:25 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Don't the union leaders know how stupid they sound when they say they will meet on Tuesday when the Board has already offered to meet with them Monday? What was the purpose of meeting last night? The tone deafness of the union and by extension all the teachers is appalling. Perhaps a few days walking a picket line and losing pay and benefits will bring them to their senses. Let them strike!

Reply

Susan

12:44 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

I assume the teachers and their union have read some economic news during the past 2 to 3 years regarding our economy. We all pay more than 10% and most of us pay 50% of our own benefits packages which are less generous packages than what you all are fortunate enough to have.

None of us have guaranteed raises, nor do we have guaranteed jobs tomorrow. Many of us are earning 25% to 50% less than we earned 5 years ago.
Many of us have lost our jobs.

Please realize the rest of us live with a different set of realities than you seem to and really do not support what you are doing.

Reply

David Brown

1:43 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

The golden goose is almost dead already. Why should anyone be guaranteed a raise?
What fantasyland are they living in?????????? Get real people..........

Reply

Nancy H

2:16 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Every one of the moms I know with students at the high school is, like me, astonished at the Union's greed in ignoring economic reality. Now, after reading the Board's strike plan, I can say that I am not as concerned about a strike. It is a good plan and we will get through this just fine until the teachers come to their senses and stop supporting this Union that is leading them seriously astray. Thank you, Board members, for standing up to these irresponsible demands!

Reply

John Utah

3:34 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Viewing that "website" the teachers created....what a sad, sad video that is. I had some of those teachers, and it's just sad that they really think they are disadvantaged. Plus, a few of them come off extremely elitist, which isn't helping their cause.

LF Board - you should have been even harder. Alas, hold the line or we are coming for your job next election.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nancy H

6:16 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

What is the url? I'd like to see that video. Thanks.

Me

3:48 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

More than a few taxpayers are pi$$3d off over how ridiculously generous the Board was in their last and final offer. My advice to the union is to take it and run. It doesn't get much better than that.

Reply

Deadcatbounce

5:12 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

If strike happens, it's a good time to check out some of the online learning sites like Khan Academy. I have a nephew that used Khan site to get through A/P calculus since his teacher was so bad. He ended up getting a "4" on the exam all thanks to Khan. This strike can be a gateway to "online learning", an alternative to a high price teacher in a classroom. I'm not sure why online learning is not used for more A/P classes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Concerned parent

6:18 am on Monday, September 10, 2012

I can tell you why since I am in the middle of that issue right now for my two students at the school. The school, through the department heads, refuses to grant credit for any outside credit for most students, even for online classes given through accredited schools. They have twisted the school board policy 6:310 to give them this power. They say they get to approve which students take the classes not just the courses themselves. Unless you are homebound or have other such disabilities they won't grant credit for outside courses. This effectively eliminates this learning option for most students at the school and eliminates the opportunity to take courses in the summer. I can imagine that this very restrictive policy has a big financial cost to the school and I suspect that the teachers union is behind this effort to keep students in their classrooms. We don't really need as many teachers when highly qualified teachers are available online to guide students through online curriculum for a fraction of the cost. Once the strike issue is solved I want to address the school board on this issue and would love support from the community. If anyone would like to give me feedback on this issue or join me in this effort please email me personally at online.courses.lfhs@gmail.com

John Utah

10:26 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

@Nancy - link is in the article, last part.

Reply

John Utah

10:36 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Teachers reading this - your greed will continue to make the state and federal government insolvent. While you are enjoying your pension for life in Florida, the students you claim to care for will be left with the debt, taxes, and economic pain to deal with. For people that claim to care about the next generation, you certainly have a unforgivable way of showing it.

The gravy train is over for you. The taxpayers may or may not win this battle, but the curtain has been pulled back for all to see and we will win in the long run. Your true intentions have been exposed and the taxpayers will be silent no more, in good times or bad. Get ready for the biggest political battle of your career. I'm sure you realize it's already happening.

Reply

LTH

2:27 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

As a member of the Lake Forest High School Graduating Class of 2010, I proudly support the teachers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shirley

7:18 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

LTH: you are not a working, real estate tax paying home owner, I presume. You am sing a different tune if you understood what their terms will do to our tax burden, our ability to sell our house and therefore home value. Then, when all home values fall, the monies available for schools fall. But, the ones that are negotiating this 2-tier system will be gone. Their whole plan is to retire in a couple of years with their pension based on their last years of earnings.
Your teachers may have been really nice & great teachers, but WE taxpayers cannot abide this. The Board can & should FIRE & RELACE any teacher who doesn't return when asked.

Comment_arrow

David Greenberg

9:32 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

When you turn 18, and when you start paying taxes LTH, then you get to support the teachers. Until then, you don't get to vote.

Me

3:21 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

If the teachers in that laughable video think that they are helping their cause, they need to think again. Your pompous sense of entitlement is repulsive and your attitude is galvanizing public sentiment against you. The offer on the table is insanely generous, take it and salvage what is left of your reputations. Go on strike and be prepared for years of resentment.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shirley

7:25 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

I was shocked and saddened by the video. I come from a family of educators. Never have I heard such pompous speech.
It may be time for a new beginning.

Patrick

6:23 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

We want the best teachers in our community. And, of course, we get what we pay for. As a whole, our teachers have delivered. As our superintendent likes to boast, our kids' ACT scores have improved steadily, reaching an all-time high the last couple of years. Thank you, teachers.

It is true that the economy is bad, but it's also true that teaching is not the same as other professions. And it is a profession. While teachers in our district get paid well, they don't have the earning potential that other professions have. They don't get huge raises and bonuses when the economy is booming, like many of we do. And yet they've chosen a profession that is extremely challenging. Have you ever taught a classroom of 25-30 children, many of whom don't want to be there. These are our kids.

So teaching is a very difficult career with limited earning potential compared to other professions (lawyers, doctors, engineers, businessmen and women). On top of it all, teachers are not well respected in this society, which is a shame -- and an indictment. Instead, teachers are greedy. That's laughable. They've chosen a career that is the opposite of greedy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shirley

7:32 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Patrick, then explain why we rate lower than all surrounding districts and some in Chicago!! And, what profession gives you a guaranteed pension & healthcare? Guess who is paying for that. I don't begrudge our teachers that, simply factor that into tour above economic argument.

Comment_arrow

Patrick

10:33 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

When one decides to be a teacher, he or she looks at the whole package, just as you would. The earning potential is far less than other professions (business, engineering, law, medicine), but the health and retirement benefits are better (perhaps).

However, if you want to make teaching more like other professions, perhaps we should follow Tom's advice. I found this in the Gazebo. Tom wants to get rid of the union. He writes:

"I think we should get rid of the teachers’ union, and dramatically increase pay to the teachers. Then create a more realistic retirement package (in line with federal employees and the private sector), and ask the employees to shoulder a similar level of the cost of the healthcare burden as the private sector. We would be an example to the rest of the state – and I think we would hire outstanding teachers. If the starting salary was currently around $60,000 – I would increase it to $80,000. The savings in the retirement/healthcare would more than make up for the increased salary costs. Also, I would look more at merit pay. There is no reason a great teacher (of whom we have many) should make the same as an average teacher. I would pay the great ones even more!!!!!"

What we offer our teachers comes down to how we value them. If we value them, and if they are great teachers who deliver results, then we should pay them according to their value. And, of course, their value relates to how we value our children's education.

Comment_arrow

David Greenberg

9:35 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

"While teachers in our district get paid well, they don't have the earning potential that other professions have." I'm ROTFLMAO with this one. Many of these teachers on the North Shore are paid well over $100K - that's pretty good earning potential. Principals $200K. Other Administrators $250K+.

The social compact used to be "Lower earning potential, so we fund a pension for you to take care of you in your old age." Flash forward to the Present: $100K+ salary, 100% benefits, Pension.... ummm, what's wrong with this picture?

As far as I'm concerned, as the teacher's salary goes up, the taxpayer's contribution to benefits and pensions should approach zero. As they reach $100K, they get nothing from us - let them save their own money.

Patrick

7:14 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Teachers are "sheltered" from big raises and bonuses in the best of times. They should also be sheltered in the worst of times. I know, I know. The board's offer is fair. It's a 3.6% raise. But everyone, except for the teachers, is ignoring the board's demands with regard to healthcare. Guys, it's not a 3.6% raise.

If teaching is such a great deal, then more of us would be teachers. Instead, our best and brightest choose professions other than teaching. We acknowledge that education in America is on the decline. We acknowledge that good teachers are critical. And yet we continue bashing teachers. Who would want to be a teacher in this environment? This is a problem that we are exacerbating.

Our teachers are negotiating, just like the board is, and just like many of us do in our jobs. If you are a businessman or woman, a lawyer, an architect or an engineer, you negotiate. This is business, and I would expect our teachers to negotiate, to stand up for themselves, and for their proud profession. If they didn't, then they wouldn't be the teachers I want in my community. They are intelligent and, more importantly, they've chosen a career devoted to our children (something none of us have done). I want teachers who can take a stand. It's a sign of strength -- and of good teaching.

Don't you find it strange that our teachers cannot afford to live in our community? And yet we bash. Teaching is an honorable profession. They deserve more respect.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Deadcatbounce

8:16 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

More of us want to teach, but can't because there are no jobs. Go ahead and strike, there is currently a couple hundred applications for each open teaching Job. What's not to like, pay is good, good benefits, wealthy school district, summers off and the pension.

Comment_arrow

Patrick

9:35 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Teaching jobs are available in many poor communities. In the suburbs, however, and especially in the North Shore, the best teachers are snatched up and held onto. That's because you work hard to find good talent, and you work harder to keep good talent. This is true in any good business. We must value our excellent teachers.

AGF

8:14 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

My family supports the teachers!

Reply

Me

8:23 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

@Patrick (union shill) -

Real World we reward and promote the best and the brightest. The laggards get cast out. vs. "Teacherland" there is no differentiation between good and bad. After four years, all have the magic shield of tenure

Real World people pay into their own retirement and the employer "matches" fractionally. This is called defined contribution. vs. Teacherland has a defined benefit pension (that is extinct in Real World).

Real World employers pass increased health insurance costs through to employees. vs. Teacherland where employees expect to pay nothing.

And our teachers can (and do) afford to live in our community. Contrast this with many Real World taxpayers who have seen their jobs disappear, home values plummet and the demands of the teachers skyrocket.

No one is trying to force the teachers to take a huge pay cut. You say 3.6% is not a raise because they will be asked to cover some of their expenses. Well, there are a lot of us Real World taxpayers who would rejoice at that 3.6% that in Patrick World isn't a raise. We are already (and have been for a long time) covering those same expenses.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Patrick

9:27 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Wow. Name calling. You don't know anything about me. I simply don't agree with you. Now how about a civil discussion?

I agree with you about tenure, but this is a different issue. Please stick to the issue, which is what our teachers deserve. The vast majority of our teachers, by the way, are excellent. Not as you describe them.

Regarding retirement, again, I agree with you, but that's not the issue here. Also, are you aware that teachers do contribute to their pension? And they save outside of their pension.

Next, the teachers who live in our community, at least the ones I know, are not the primary bread winners. The median home price in Lake Forest is $700,000 (see money.cnn.com). Teachers cannot afford this. We are very fortunate to live where we live.

Lastly, please read my post more carefully. I did not say "3.6% is not a raise". I said that it "ignores the board's demands with regard to healthcare". You need to look at the big picture. This is a common tactic of negotiating: point at what you are giving, but ignore what you are taking away.

I.M. Weasel

8:48 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

I am curious whether the younger teachers realize they are being used as pawns by the soon to retire teachers. The Illinois pension system is bankrupt as it cannot sustain the legacy of ultra-generous payouts. Due to a quirk in our state constitution (although I would not entirely rule out a constitutional amendment) benefits cannot be reduced post-retirement. Thus, the "old timers" are scurrying to beef up their pensions so that they can lock in the highest possible payouts. Young teachers are the footsildiers who are on the front lines. You are suffering the greatest losses (in terms of reputation and respect) while your older colleagues will soon take the money and run.

Please don't be greedy and unreasonable.

Reply

Concerned Mom

9:28 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Let them strike! The reason teachers stay at Lake Forest is not because they care, it is because no other school district would pay what they are asking. If they really cared about the kids and the community, we would not be going through this!

I have the utmost respect for teachers. It is a honorable profession. I know several teachers with masters degrees that would be willing to come forward and teach if these teachers strike! I say let them strike! It is time for a new beginning in Lake Forest!

Reply

Patrick

10:46 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

I write today because I think it's important to consider both sides of an argument. We know good people who are teachers. They are just like us. Their hearts are in the right place -- maybe even more so because they are teachers. They are simply looking out for themselves, as we would do. Our teachers are not being unreasonable. If you are interested in more information about their point of view, then follow this link:

http://gazebonews.com/2012/08/19/what-lake-forest-teachers-want-lfea-issues-statement/

If we cannot walk in their shoes, at least we can try to understand where they are coming from. By the way, I don't believe they will strike. I believe they will settle. Look at our history.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Todd

2:01 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Thanks for sharing; I did nt know all these details. I guess I need to start reading Gazebo news more.

LTH

12:09 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Shirley:
Whether or not I am a homeowner has no bearing on my support for the LFEA or the level of that support. And yes, my teachers were great, but I tell you this: I support them not only because they do amazing work, but also because they do one of the hardest and one of the most important jobs a person can do in this country. I have read proposals and I stand behind the teachers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Roger Billings

12:53 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Sorry LTH, but if you don't pay taxes here, you don't have a dog in this hunt. Now run upstairs out of the basement and ask your parents if they like their taxes going up, up, up to pay for greedy teachers.

LTH

1:07 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Mr. Billings, as a person who has lived in this community for over 10 years, and and as a voter and a taxpayer, I do have a "dog in this hunt".

Reply
Comment_arrow

Me

10:03 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

@LTH - As a member of the class of 2010, unless you are a property tax payer, you don't have a dog in the hunt. However, once you start paying property taxes, you will wake up and see the madness of the union's greed.

Kathie

3:30 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

It is all about trade offs. We had a choice and moved to LF knowing that LFHS wasn't the highest ranked school academically in the area. But, it is a really good school and the benefits of being the smallest on the north shore and in a nice, supportive community well made up for that.

Same thing with you, teachers. You chose to work in a union environment. Despite your passion for teaching, you knew this going in. Just like a young management consultant knows they will have to sell their soul working day and night for the big bucks they hope to earn. You receive lower cash pay vs. other professionals particularly at the beginning largely because of tenure! And, a distant second, more time off too (as a professional, I had to take calls during my honeymoon and worked many holidays away from my family! Do you?) If my firm doesn't do well, guess what? I get fired even if I "worked hard" and am "passionate" and "went to a good school" because the money isn't there and the option of going back to the taxpayer till isn't an option.

Please. Stop this. You have a good offer in a very bad economy.

Reply

marco sangria

9:42 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

lth, your dog in the hunt is most likely is on the dole like you.

Reply

LTH

11:24 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Marco, I'm sorry you feel that way. However, I am currently a college student who is far from being "on the dole". I am, however, a resident of the Lake Bluff/Lake Forest community who would like to see the way we treat our public servants rise to the level at which they serve us.

Reply

marco sangria

11:46 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

lth, dont feel sorry for me. i am happy to pay my fair share. The waste and the excess disappoint me. My guess is you pay little to none of the federal, state or real estate taxes. You have no skin in the game. You can treat the public servants well by paying your fair share of the taxes on every level.

Reply

LTH

11:53 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

@David Greenburg - I would hope that it was clear from my saying I graduated in 2010 that I am over 18 years old. And, not that it is your business, but I have paid taxes for several years now. But it doesn'tmatter, because here's a little something I picked up in my junior year US History AP class: it used to be that only white men who owned land had the right to vote. That's not true anymore. And the assumption that is made about property taxes being the gateway to having the right to take part in the democratic exercise is about condescending as it gets. I welcome peaceful debate. I do not respect, nor value the opinions of, individuals whose only method of political discourse is insults and the assertions that the other sides very right to speak does not exist. It's called the 26th Amendment to the Constitution. Learn it, love it, respect it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lynette Paulson

11:41 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

@LTH how can we respect the constitution if our own president Barack Hussein Obama doesn't even respect it. Some role model and leader he is.

Comment_arrow

David Greenberg

1:40 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

@LTH - just because you graduated in 2010 doesn't automatically mean that you're over 18 yrs old. You could have skipped a grade, you could have been 16 when you graduated and are only now just turning 18.

The 26th Amendment notwithstanding, I don't have any problem with any part of the Constitution. So if you've over 18, and you want to vote on something - by all means, have at it. But give it some time-watch your property taxes go up and up and up - and look at where the money is going. At least here in HP, it's primarily to the two school districts.

And then look at how the money is spent. Look at the gold-plated benefits packages given to teachers who usually work 10 mos out of the year, and compare to those in the private sector. Look at the costs of the pensions when the administrators play games and bump up the salaries of the teachers so they make more in retirement than they did as a teacher. Look at the costs of the health/dental benefits and compare with the private sector. Look at how the schools are maintained and how high salaries impact the amount given toward maintenance and future replacement needs. Look at the super high salaries paid to Administrators and the extra benefits they get.

Then look at how all this negatively impacts YOUR retirement, and maybe, just maybe you're start to get really irritated about your tax bills.

But if you're only 18 you likely haven't experienced it yet. But try to look at it from the perspective of others.

Comment_arrow

Walter White

5:58 am on Monday, September 10, 2012

Don't worry about it, LTH. Greenberg is a right wing troll from Highland Park who loves to stick his nose in other people's business. You will encounter many like him in life. Stay strong to your beliefs. HP will be striking very soon and he will do little more than post his nonsense on the Patch 100 times a day.

Comment_arrow

David Greenberg

11:57 pm on Monday, September 10, 2012

@Walter: I am not a troll. See the definition here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29

From that link: "A troll is someone who posts inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[3] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion"

I do not post off-topic messages, my comments are not extraneous, and although you may consider some of them inflammatory, many (including myself) do not. I'm not attempting to provoke an emotional response or to disrupt the conversation.

Again, if what I say bothers you - that's unfortunate, but ultimately it's your problem.

As for your contention that I "love to stick [my] nose in other people's business" - that's not true either. I comment when I believe that what I have to say is relevant to the discussion at-hand. If it happens to be outside of the immediate community in which I reside, it's because what's going on in the other communities MAY tend to have an affect on my community.

LTH

12:30 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Marco, I mean no disrespect when I say that I do not feel sorry for you in anyway. Rather, I am sorry that you feel that I am not truthful when I say that I am not "on the dole".

Reply

AGF

7:58 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Just to be clear and factual: In the state of Illinois, Teacher Tenure has changed greatly, it's more of an rating system, the skill of the teacher holds a higher emphasizes over seniority, the growth of the student is measured in a teacher evaluation. Look it up and get the facts right about tenure. Three of my children attended LFHS, we support the teachers!

Reply

I.M. Weasel

8:07 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Maybe one of those speakers in the video posted on the teacher's website could explain something. They claim to be passionate about educating children yet they are holding those very children hostage in an attempt to wring the very last dollar out of the taxpayer. There seems to be not just a disconnect, but a chasm between the two positions.

I have seen many comments claiming that the offer on the table is so stingy that it will cause a locust horde like exodus of teachers. We are told that experienced teachers are in such high demand and are so sought after that any of them could land jobs within weeks if not days. However, the teachers prefer to strike rather than to exercise their rights to move on to those greener pastures. Lake Forest ranks 18th and 20th out of 894 in the state for starting salaries. This is clear evidence that there are not many pastures that are actually greener.

The Board has made a very generous off. Please dispense with the theatrics. Either take the offer or leave.

Reply

marco sangria

8:11 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

lth and iaf please understand we all support quality education but at what price? Spend spend spend is not the answer. Its nice that you are so generous and thoughtful with your money as well as others. I have a hunch that your feelings would approve the current situation with our federal defcit.

Reply

LTH

10:02 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Marco, "the current situation with our national debt" has almost nothing to do with the current debate. I will say however that this last comment of yours that I will respond to. Teachers are not "hogs" and in today's world I fond it in extremely bad taste to be making any reference, regardless of it being simply an ill advised metaphor, to their slaughter. Read the news, we can't afford this kind of talk anymore.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Greenberg

1:44 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Certainly the current situation with the national debt has an impact on our local spending. Credit ratings for the Country filter down and impact borrowing costs for other units of Government. The deplorable credit status of the once great state of Illinois has an impact on whether entities wish to invest in our state, and that has an impact on the tax base for the local units of government.

And as our individual Federal tax burden goes up, that leaves less money on the table for the State and local government units - or at least it should, as things go, they try to grab as much as they possibly can, which leaves the common citizen with even less in their pocket.

Me

10:10 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

@lth- in your attempt to sound wise beyond your years, you actually come off sounding foolish and naive.

Reply

LTH

10:30 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Honestly Me, coming from you that feels like the highest praise I could get.

Reply

I.M. Weasel

11:36 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Sorry LTH, gotta agree with ME on this one. You do look rather like a kid who is dressed up in his fathers clothes.

Reply

LTH

12:23 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

@Ms. Paulson- Well, first off, I disagree with you over the level of respect the President has shown the Constitution. But regardless, you can respect the Consitution by the very fact that you should. And honestly, the level at which you believe the President respects the US Constitution should have no influence over your acceptance of my constitutional right to vote.

Reply

James Rittner

1:04 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

The Patchies quickly turn any contrary opinion into an attack on the person giving it. This is not a forum for discussion, it's a place where a small group of angry people gather to vent over their issue du jour. This month it's the teacher contract. Next month it will be something else. My recommendation to everyone here who is serious in their support of the teachers and of fair negotiations, to show up at the Board meeting on Tuesday and say so...and avoid The Patch like the plague. You won't change any minds here...you just offer yourself up as yet another target for anonymous blog bashing.

Reply

Kathie

4:18 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

@James. Here's the thing that you fail to take into account. Most parents with kids in the system right now are fearful of retaliation against our kids if we speak openly against the union. Most of us really like most of our teachers, but we know so well what damage a union-protected teacher bent on revenge can do to a kid's life. (Been there... done that.)

I suspect the same is true of teachers who might not be fully on board for where their union is leading them. If the union is so confident that what it is doing is in the best interests of the teachers, then why do they force an open strike vote and then bully the handful who are forced to stand up and identify themselves as opposed to a strike?

I know these comments won't change any minds. But, just want to warn you that relative silence from the community does not mean that parents here are in agreement with the union.

Reply
Comment_arrow

LTH

12:30 pm on Monday, September 10, 2012

Though it also possible that the same could be true, at least for the parents, in the opposite case. For that reason, the use of silence as a sign of support is invalid.

I.M. Weasel

4:55 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Ooh, Patchie, I think I like that label.

Reply

TakeAction

10:52 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Whatever your opinion, the right way to have it heard by people who can impact the situation is to attend the BOE meeting on Sept. 11 at 7:00 pm.

Reply

Me

6:22 am on Monday, September 10, 2012

Attendance at the Board meeting will not be truly representative of the opinion of taxpayers. The problem is that all speakers must identify themselves by name and address. If you have a child in the school system, you will be hesitant to appear because you fear that teachers will see revenge on your children. That is why many people choose to post under pseudonyms on blogs.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Greenberg

12:05 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

So identify yourself as an "ANONYMOUS Speaker", and give your address as "Lake Forest School District, IL", wear a mask if you wish too.

To the best of my knowledge, there's no law requiring that you give your name/address when you stand up to speak. They can ask for it, but over the years I've heard many people in many forums give their name and simply state their address as the town itself.

The fear of providing information that the teachers/union may use against one is but one reason to remain anonymous. Another is that the meetings may be videotaped, and you may not wish to provide your name/address to the countless numbers of viewers watching the meetings.

Another is that the right to anonymous speech is long cherished and protected in this Country, and has been upheld by the US Sup. Ct. This dates from the very founding of our country when the Federalist Papers were written under the pseudonym "Publis".

See these links:

https://www.eff.org/issues/anonymity

http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/legal_issues/legal_updates/us_supreme_court/anonymous_speech.htm

Me

1:44 pm on Monday, September 10, 2012

@little lth - not the same, not even close. Nonetheless, many concerned taxpayers have already voiced our concern with the Board. All members of the Board are fully aware that their personal reputations are at stake if they give in to the union thugs who are holding our children hostage.

Reply

SportsMan

7:13 pm on Monday, September 10, 2012

Notice what the IHSA said to Chicago Schools regarding athletic contests during a strike. Tell your BOE to work to settle this thing

Reply

Leave a comment