patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch.
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

No Discussions Seen Thursday in Lake Forest Teacher Strike

Representatives of Board and union did not meet Wednesday and Board President Sharon Golan does not expect a session Thursday.

 

Representatives of the two sides in the Lake Forest High School teacher strike did not meet Wednesday, are not likely to talk today and both blame the other for the stalemate likely to keep students out of class another day.

“We did not meet Wednesday and I feel that we will not meet tomorrow,” Lake Forest High School Community School District 115 Board of Education President Sharon Golan said. Golan says the teachers will not meet and the educators claim the Board will not negotiate.

Earlier: Lake Forest Teachers Strike as Negotiations Fail

“We made them an offer and they didn’t offer us anything back,” Lake Forest Education Association teachers’ union (LFEA) spokesperson Chuck Gress said arguing the Board is trying to force the teachers to negotiate against themselves.

Gress explained the union received a written offer Tuesday afternoon, responded to the District with a proposal in writing and has yet to receive a response. His group is unwilling to resume negotiations without a reply.

Golan does not dispute Gress’s version of the facts when it comes to written offers, but is firm in her belief the Board is negotiating in good faith and did not ignore the teachers’ proposal. She believes the District acted.

“We did not receive a written proposal from the Union last night,” Golan said. “The supposal (an oral offer) we received we responded to. We rejected it.” The Board also said on the school’s website it was open to meeting but the LFEA will not.

Gress rejects the statement his group is unwilling to negotiate. He indicated union representatives waited for an hour Tuesday hoping the Board would respond to the union’s suggestions but the federal mediator reported the District would not respond.

“As of Wednesday, the last offer was made by the LFEA,” Gress said. “Since the mediator ended negotiations last night (Tuesday), the LFEA has not been contacted by the BOE. The LFEA has never said that it would not meet with the BOE and is still awaiting a response to our financial proposal.”

The two sides have also issued different reports and statement demonstrating the financial health of the District. At Tuesday’s Board meeting, the proposed budget for the coming school year indicated the District could barely afford to pay the teachers its proposed 2.7 percent increase.

“You cannot dispute those numbers,” Golan said. “It would be helpful if we could start with the same set of numbers.” When Deputy Superintendent for Finance and Operations Allen Albus introduced the proposed budget Tuesday, he did not indicate whether he used the Board’s proposal or the suggestion of the LFEA to craft the project.

“Our assumptions are built on current market conditions,” Albus said but did not define the market. “If we have to amend it we will do that.”

Meanwhile, the school will be open for students today but there will be no instruction. College visits and the college application process will continue uninterrupted. A complete strike plan is contained on the District website.

For more news and updates from Lake Forest-Lake Bluff Patch, subscribe to our daily e-newsletter, ”Like” us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Related Topics: Lake Forest Community High School School District 115, Lake Forest Education Association, Lake Forest High School, Sharon Golan, and teacher strike

NotAntiUnionAntiGreed

7:39 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

The LF School Board is going to bust the strike with replacement teachers. They receive thousands of applications every year from highly qualified teachers looking to teach on LF's bucolic campus. All of those applications are sitting in a computer system and easily accessible. The board would be wise to send out a mass email to all in the system saying "If you are still interested in teaching at LFHS, even on a temporary to potentially permanent basis, click here to reapply."

The kids will still receive a great education because you will have highly qualified teachers who are working to keep their job. The temps will know that they are being evaluated and judge every day. That will bring out the very best in them. Possibly a better result than the tenured teachers who just fall into a rut of complacency and indifference.

Reply
Comment_arrow

R. Reading

9:39 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Ah, OK, then why is the high school asking for "helpers" to come in? I don't see them calling up replacement teachers.

Joe

8:07 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Do the teachers know the details of the last offer made by the Board Monday? If not, why not? Why would the union leaders want to keep the teachers in the dark? Would the teachers be embarrassed to know their leaders rejected a reasonable compromise?

Reply

Me

8:30 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

If you dig a little deeper into the union demands, they are trying to claw back the "hard freeze" that they love to publicize. They claim that they took no raise at all last year (neither did many of the taxpayers but that is a nuance clearly missed by the union spokesman). However, a freeze is not a freeze when you extort above market raises in future years by holding children's education hostage by walking out and striking.

I would like to propose a compromise on the "two tiered" pay scale. All existing teachers should convert to the pay scale for the new teachers. If you are above scale you get your COLA until the scale catches up to you. If you don't like it, you are welcome to seek employment elsewhere. If you do like it, get back to work and show that you are truly in it for the kids. If you are not in it for the kids, stop lying to them and to yourselves.

Reply

Taxpayer

9:05 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

The truth is, this strike only spotlights how outdated the unions really are. If these people were picketing to stop hazardous working conditions or abusive bosses they might get some sympathy. They should be decertified, Ms. Golan should call their bluff.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff

6:28 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Yeah! I agree! Those highly educated individuals who chose to forgo higher paying careers so they could help our children grow and become successful adults should never have a say in their economic security! Right on!

R. Reading

9:18 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

The entire Board of Education needs to be replaced. They are lousy. The teachers union is lousy, too. Both sides are being terrible. And who loses here? And if there are all these teachers in the woodwork waiting to teach at LFHS, why is the high school asking for "helpers" to run the school next week? That is the lamest thing I've ever heard. Let's get parent volunteers to run the classrooms. OMG. GIve me a break. Sharon Golan and the rest of the BOE, why don't you get in there and "help"!!! And the teachers are losing my respect by the minute. The only decent thing I've heard is the football coach who crossed picket lines to hold practice.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Utah

9:29 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

They are asking for helpers because they hope to fill the gaps temporarily in hopes that the Union comes to its senses. At some point, yes, they will have to tap into official applicants.

And what is this mentality that only "official" college/state licensed people can teach a subject? Plenty of parents I know could teach a subject if they had the time.

And here's the dirty little secret about LFHS: the majority of a student's academic and scholastic success comes from self-motivation to succeed in a successful town, strong family academic excellence and demands, and pure God-given talents. New teachers would not change that. I'm so sick and tired of the viewpoint that ALL our children's success comes from these teachers and we should be soooooo frigging grateful.

Comment_arrow

Gary

9:45 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

You nailed it John. The biggest fear the teachers have right now is that replacements will be brought in at much lower salaries and that our students will continue to perform at very high levels. If that happens, and as you have pointed out I'm betting it would, they lose all bargaining power.

Dave R.

9:34 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

I've heard that the average salary is over $100k with pension benefits and so forth. How many days per year do they work for that 100K? Do some make over $1000 a day?

Reply
Comment_arrow

RationalTht

10:39 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Dave - the average salary is over $100k BEFORE pension and benefits. Take into account that they work at most 10 months out of the year, you can multiply any salary you see by at least 1.2 to "adjust" it for amount of time worked. As for pensions, teachers near retirement are earning in the neighborhood of $150,000 per year - this leads to a YEARLY pension of $120,000 - given that teachers can retire at 55, you are looking at 25-30 years of pension which would be $3,000,000 to $3,600,000 - and that is BEFORE the COLA adjustments that are added to them as welll.

Comment_arrow

Jeff

6:29 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

How many hours a year do they work? More than the average private sector employee.

A third of the teachers are retiring in three years - the average salary stat is inflate. In three years it will be the lowest average in the north shore. LFHS has a low starting salary for new teachers compared to other districts nearby.

Comment_arrow

Jeff

6:31 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@RationalTht
I am guessing you did not learn math at LF. Thats a load of hypothetical math that makes no sense. Give me a break. If they have it so good, you should be a teacher

RationalTht

9:35 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Quick question - I know the SC ruled that replacement workers don't have to be replaced by the strikers when the strikers come back - does that mean that some of the teachers could be out of jobs? Or will the BOE cave on this issue?

Reply
Comment_arrow

RationalTht

10:54 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

You can use the site to "compare" LF to schools in the area. Not that easy because you have to page through almost 200 pages of schools, no search capabilities.

To give people an idea, the NIU site basically shows LF is ahead of Highland Park, basically tied with Libertyville, and well behind Deerfield, New Trier, and Stevenson on standardized testing results.

LF Resident/Parent

9:40 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@ Joe I believe the LFEA negotiation team has the sole power to accept or deny any BOE offer without presenting it to its members. We do know they never shared the original offer in June when the teachers voted to strike.
The LFEA drew the line in the sand that has put us in this situation. With that said, whatever the BOE offer was Tuesday night, the taxpayer and the LFEA members are both in the dark.
I am sure the hard core union members are using old school bullying methods to pressure the younger teachers.
The kids have learned from emotional wellness initiative. Maybe LFEA members need to stop talking and start listening.

Reply

R. Reading

9:44 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

GET RID OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION. THEY ARE CAREER BOARD MEMBERS WHO NEED TO GET OUT. NOT ONE OF THEM HAS A CHILD ATTENDING LFHS. ENOUGH ALREADY. THE TEACHER'S UNION CAN LEAVE, TOO.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Utah

9:48 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@RR - I'm with you - the Board needs a shakeup next to curtail Administrative salaries and benefits. We can only take back our community one step at a time....

Comment_arrow

Me

9:54 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@Reading - You do know they are elected don't you? Although I would love to fire them we cannot. To your point though, they are notoriously poor at what they do. You only need to look at how Harry Griffith manipulated them to see that they are inept. Handling this situation properly and acting decisively is one way that they can salvage their reputations.

Comment_arrow

R. Reading

10:24 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Well, I wouldn't say they are elected in the true sense of the word. They are slated by the Caucus and they run unopossed 95% of the time.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

11:28 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

If the people on the board do not have students attending school, they are more likely to be impartial than those with kids in school. I am saying this as a parent that has one in LFHS now and a few up and coming.

Comment_arrow

Anna K

12:06 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Actually, your comment shows you don't have a clue about the process of selecting and nominating school board members who are generously donating their personal time to help our community, and many of us wouldn't consider donating that amount of time and/or subjecting ourselves to this kind of attack. Keep this up and there will no longer be volunteers, and these people are highly qualified! When they apply, they go through a rigorous interview process... more of their personal time being donated to try to fairly assist this community in an important decision making process. Would any of you be eager to volunteer right now?

LF Resident/Parent

9:51 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@ Dave R. Yes you are close on your math. $120,000/182= $659.34 a day.
So everyday = 1/2% of pay lost! (If I am correct on my math and pending the BOE doesn't give the retro pay back)
Also factor in the Health cost per day they LFEA members should owe back as well.

Reply

Me

9:52 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

This is quite simple to resolve. BOE needs to start interviewing for replacement teachers. Give the strikers a deadline of Friday. If they are not back on the job then they will be forced to reapply and compete with any replacement teachers. Even though it is overly generous, BOE needs to do the honorable thing and stick to the pay scale that was proposed to the Union.

Just get on with it though. Sitting here waiting for the other side to blink is not a good negotiating strategy. If you think that your offer and your position is a good one then act on it.

Reply

John Utah

9:59 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

TO THE TEACHERS AND UNIONISTS READING THIS:

Community fully supports Coach Spagnoli, the comments section in the Tribune and Sun-Times articles overwhelmingly supports the LF taxpayer, the commenters on LF Patch overwhelmingly supports the LF taxpayer, my Facebook feed of former LFHS graduates is making fun of you and your ridiculous stance.

YOU ARE LOSING THIS BATTLE & YOUR REPUTATION BY THE MINUTE...

Reply

Interested

10:14 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Illinois state laws show that union members can't be fired for exercising their legal right to strike. The school is not looking to fill classrooms with ad hoc teachers,just room monitors to continue to provide a safe location for students. Teachers will not be replaced during the strike and after when they return to work, their positions will be there waiting for them. This is Illinois law, not some union perk, and not something the board can change.Unfortunate as it may seem, there will be no clearing house of striking teachers or of board members until the next election.
@Dave R. Teachers work 185 school days for a contractual 7:30 - 3:30 school day. A teacher making $100,000/year, divided by 185, divided by 8 makes approximately $67.57/hr. A teacher at $150,000 makes $101.35. And a new teacher at $50,000 makes $33.78/hr. Leave out time spent outside of work preparing or grading (as all professionals spend large amounts of time off the clock doing work for their jobs), compare these salaries to other professions. It's then up to your opinion as to whether these wages are fair. To some posters on this board, a bachelors degree is worth $34/hr and a master's with 30 years experience is worth $100 or more. This is not the case for other posters.
@many of you: Illinois law states that current teachers will not receive a full pension until they complete 34 years of service, 43 years for new teachers. Anyone who claims that teachers can retire at 50 should count backward.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Me

10:26 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@Interested - very few posts have said that we should replace the teachers with low priced substitutes. We are all very much committed to maintaining high standards and almost all have said that we should stick with the BOE proposal which offers a very generous 3% annual raise above the already generous salaries (the interest split is absurd but that is another issue).

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

10:43 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

You are not factoring in the 80% retirement pensions into it. If you look at some of the teachers near retirement, they will be getting $120,000 per year IL TAX FREE. If the teachers live 25-30 years after retirement (when retiring at 55, this seems feasible), we the taxpayers are on the hook for another $3,000,000 to $3,600,000 PER TEACHER. You would probably need to add another $40,000 PER YEAR to each teachers salary to reflect this pension.

Comment_arrow

Interested

1:04 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Teacher pension income is taxable at current income tax bracket rates.

Comment_arrow

Interested

1:14 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

And the current payout for a full pension after completing necessary service is 75%, not 80%. Many teachers you see on this scale will retire with significantly decreased benefits after starting teaching later in their careers. If you retire between the ages of 55 and 60 with at least 20 but fewer than 35 years of service, your retirement annuity is reduced by 6 percent for each year (half percent per month) that you are under age 60.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

1:47 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@Interested - Thank you for the clarification on years of service. How do the "buy out" of years and accrual of sick time over the decades fit into the calculation as well. Not many places allow you to accrue unused sick time over decades and get paid out in the end.

Also, I specifically stated IL taxes, sorry if that was not clear. IL does not tax pensions or SSI.

LF Resident/Parent

10:26 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@ interested. I agree with the info you have provided but you are now comparing a teacher to the non educational proffessions. If that is the case then should the hourly employees at a wage of $101.35 in todays economy be seeking a 3 year increase in excess of what the boards offer was or now is?

Reply

Interested

10:35 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

My hourly wage statement was a response to Dave, not a statement of my opinion in the matter. Many other comments here describe the similarities and differences between the private sector and teachers, so I posed the comparison question to that end. I strongly believe that the particular issues in question here could have been resolved by continued negotiations while the school remained open and staffed with these teachers. None of the issues on the table seem to me to warrant a strike.

Reply

LF Resident/Parent

10:41 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Someone answer this:
Are the teachers in fact going to lose the per day wages and have to pay the cost of health care back per day?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Interested

10:50 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

It is also my understanding that they do not lose pay and health for days on strike, as the missed days will be made up during the school year by using the built in snow days schedule and if necessary, removing days off from holiday breaks. Since the full school year would be completed, no pay reductions would occur.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

11:26 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Why can't the board cancel the health insurance now - the teachers are not working.

Comment_arrow

Interested

12:44 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

The board can't cancel insurance or do anything else that would be deemed retaliatory toward a unionized worker exercising their rights. The teachers aren't working in the summer either, but no one cancels their insurance then.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

1:49 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@Interested - so the board is forced to pay additional monies for benefits, even though the teachers are not living up to their end? They are not in a contract, so how can that FAIRLY be enforced? Or is it because IL is a Democratic-Union run state?

R. Reading

10:44 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

It is outrageous that no talks between the two sides are scheduled.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Interested

12:44 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

There is a 2 pm meeting scheduled today

LF Resident/Parent

10:56 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

So if there is no financial consequence for their actions what stops them from striking everytime a contract issue arrises in future years?

Reply

Bonita

11:26 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

At first I thought that it was odd that the BOE was asking for volunteers to man the school, but it makes sense that right now the school is open in a non-instructive capacity. The students can attend and study or do research, but will not get instruction. Why waste money on paid substitutes at this point? Strike laws are in place, and after so many days, the law will allow for some kind of resolution. The teachers cannot stay on strike forever at the cost of the students! At that point, the BOE will be able to order a back to work demand with the consequence of being able to fire those who do not comply, and re-hire replacements. Such a pity that teachers who have been at the high school for so many years are now in a situation to lose their six figure employment! It was so comfortable for them--I wonder why they didn't see how the community has changed? Lake Forest has the highest number of foreclosures on the North Shore!

Reply
Comment_arrow

RationalTht

11:39 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

We also have the highest paid teachers on the North Shore. Our administrators are the highest paid as well, but we also have fewer administrators per pupil compared to surrounding districts.

Me

11:30 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

I just ran some numbers on the cost of pensions. Here are the assumptions: 35 years of employment with annual contributions; after year 35 there is a beginning pension payment of $120,000 per annum; annuity payments increase by 2% per annum; the annuity runs for 25 years. This puts the life expectancy at about 85 years.

Can I have a drum roll for the value of this pension plan???? The employer would need to have contributed approximately $30,000 in the teacher's first year of employment and increased the contribution amount by 3% per annum. The contribution in the final year of employment would be $83,000. Look at those numbers and tell me that the deal on the table is not fair.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RationalTht

11:37 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Thanks for running the numbers, I only did a "napkin" evaluation and came in at around $40,0000/year - it is worse that I thought.

Comment_arrow

Interested

12:49 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

The Teachers Retirement System (TRS) historically gets a. 8.5% return annually, not 3%

Comment_arrow

Me

1:11 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@Interested - I don't agree that they have been getting 8.5% and there is no way that they will get that amount in the foreseeable future but I re-ran the numbers just to amuse everyone. The year one contribution dropped to $10,750 and the year 35 contribution dropped to $29,350. Those are huge numbers using wildly unrealistic return expectations.

Comment_arrow

Interested

1:17 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@ me. you don't have to agree. the following report released in august of this year shows that from 1981 - 2011 TRS was getting a 9.3% return. Their projected return was 8.5% and they managed to do better. They have requested a decrease in projected return based on economic conditions.
http://trs.illinois.gov/subsections/press/2012/Aug23_12.pdf

Comment_arrow

Me

1:22 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@Interested - that is historic. You have to make assumptions going forward. Take a look at their investment parameters and then look at what those investments are currently yielding. Only Mr. Madoff could offer 8.5% on their portfolio in the current market.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

1:50 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@Interested - Really - 8.5% - over these past 6-7 years? That does not seem to pass the smell test.

Sally Salzer

12:18 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Interested Parent:

I have one comment:

First, regardless of what side any of us are on (the BOE or Teacher's Union), nothing will get resolve if the two sides don't sit down an talk. It has now been two days and no talks are scheduled. The Teacher's Union says they made a proposal on Tuesday night and the BOE ignored it. The BOE says they rejected it. It DOESN'T matter. Both Sharon Golan and Chuck Gress are elected leaders of their respective groups, now step up and LEAD!!!! Get to the table and work this out.

Reply

mom0f4

12:57 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Most of us only know what we hear from the two sides in articles such as this. What I see is the city of Chicago teachers striking for the right to have schools with working heat in the middle of winter, calculators for its students and for the right to a teachers aid for classrooms that have 36 kids in them. They are striking for the benefit of their students. Its sad that this is not what the Lake Forest strike is about.

Reply

Jen

3:40 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Solution for everyone. . .the teachers should vote to get rid of their union, and then rise and fall, like the rest of us, based on job performance. Each teacher, like the rest of us, should negotiate his or her own pay and benefits package. Please don't tell me that high school teachers need tenure to somehow protect themselves from an unjust firing. No matter how well I do in the private sector, there is always the chance I will be fired for no reason at all. It's called employment "at will." They can't see they are an unjustly overcompensated, protected subset of the American worker and that their union doesn't work for them, but for politicians with agendas having nothing whatsoever to do with education. So decertify the LFEA and let each teacher have the dignity and freedom to enter into a contract with the Board and negotiate his or her own deal, and then rise and fall by his or her own job performance or lack thereof. It's the American Way! I guarantee, thousands of highly qualified folks who love kids and love to teach and actually have mastered their own subject matter. . .unlike a FEW TOO MANY at LFHS. . .will line the sidewalks and wait in the wind, rain and snow to snag one of those 10 month a year jobs with many paid vacation days and very little pressure compared with the real world, where a screw up could cost a person life, limb or property.

Reply

Jeff

7:03 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Jen,
I appreciate the logic, but it just doesn't work that way in education.
It is impossible to quantify with CERTAINTY the worth of an individual teacher. There are so many variable. And teachers do so many different things. As a result, a pay scale is needed.
Individual salaries would change the culture of trust and collaboration amongst peers.
The "American Way" is about collective success and sacrifice.
The teachers at LFHS are on a level different than most schools. Most residents don't understand how many scholars, brilliant people are in there. There are great teachers at other schools, but this is a highly intellectual group of teachers.
And tell me there is no pressure when performing in front of hundreds of teenagers everyday, being entrusted with an incredibly important responsibility.

Reply

Jen

7:45 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Regarding your argument about teacher "pay"-- just substitute lawyer, doctor, nurse, accountant, sales rep, private school teacher, etc. for "teacher" and you'll see you still just don't get it, which leads me to believe you have never worked in a job without a union set pay scale. The fact is, every day the free market is making decisions about who should be paid what, and it works better than any system ever devised for the rest of us, so why not for public school teachers? Is there injustice in some cases? Of course! But that is no reason to shield an entire subset of the American workforce from individual scrutiny and evaluation, with a wage based thereon, just like the rest of us! And the bit about pressure? Admittedly, it can be highly subjective. But pleasing a boss who is generally more experienced than you and could firre you for any reason or no reason is real pressure. Pleasing a bunch of children with your presentation that day is not...try the private sector in a $100,000 plus job whose term is 12 months, without your generous vacation day package and you'll know what I mean.

Reply

kathryn

8:07 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

I think we need to bring in the, "Frat Boys," I can have my people call their people ;-)

Reply

Law

8:41 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Hey me, why don't you do something intelligent and read up on the laws in Illinois regarding strikes. Then you will understand why the board can't run out and hire replacements. Bascially, its against the law. I know you think you have all the answers. But honestly, the board can't use any of the tactics you describe because they would be violating the law. Stop blaming them. You obviously are not smart enought to understand that no matter what community you live in or how powerful you are you are not allowed to break the law. Well in your case I wouldn't be surprised to find that you probably have at some point!

Reply

Go Scouts!

8:53 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

For all of you who are so upset about the pay for only ten months and the schedule teachers have. You should have become a teacher then. The schedule has always been what it is and will not change. Stop complaining about stuff you wish you have, you had the opportunity to become a teacher yourself

Reply

Another Affected Tax Payer

9:05 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Law, I'd like to believe what you say is true. Perhaps you're a lawyer but the immaturity with the insult hurling lowers the intelligence & credibilty of your post as well. Best to just stay with the facts.

Reply

Another Affected Tax Payer

9:13 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

@Go Scouts, Oh God no do I wish I had gone into teaching. Unions would drive me nuts. I'm way too independent for that and I prefer efficient systems.

Reply

Louis

9:22 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Teachers do not stop working, even when the school day ends. They stay up late preparing assignments, they keep the troubles of their fledgling and emotionally troubled students at the forefront of their minds. Some of them have large families, some of them are the only breadwinner in their house. Some of them have children with a chronic illness, (or two children), but find it in their emotional reserve to give their full attention and care to the children of our nation's most privileged citizens.

Whenever I hear people labeling teachers as greedy, or bemoaning their merit increases, I hear the sound of people threatened by the courage and emotional fortitude teachers have. I hear the sound of someone who doesn't have the guts to stand up for his own salary the way teachers stand together.

Are there problems with unions? Yes. There should be a sensible way to replace bad teachers. But, in Lake Forest there are very few, if any, "bad" teachers. The privileged citizens of this town demand the absolute best quality education from the teachers at LFHS, but then savage those same teachers when they demand pay at a level equal to the value of what they provide. That's hypocrisy. It's also shameful.

My teachers in high school were tremendous. I count several of them as life-changing, supportive figures in my life. I would pay them more than the CEO of Chase if I could. Because, see, they don't gamble away livelihoods, they build them up. That's invaluable.

Peace.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Deadcatbounce

10:40 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Very few "bad" teachers! How about the teacher, a few years from retiring, receiving their automatic 6% annual increase, that shows up half the time. How about the teacher that's out on maternity leave and the HS hires the most worthless replacement. How about the teacher that knows the subject matter, but just can't convey the material to the students. What planet are you from?

Comment_arrow

Jeff

5:41 am on Friday, September 14, 2012

@Deadcat
Did you just complain that a teacher took a maternity leave? Or are you blaming that teacher for the temporary replacement that the administration hired?
Yikes, we are really traveling upstream now.

Me

10:17 pm on Thursday, September 13, 2012

in many ways the taxpayers should thank Chuck Gress for bringing the issue to the forefront. Had the teachers simply accepted the uber-generous offer made by the BOE, this all would have flown under the radar screen and the union would have scored a coup in the form of above average raises in a stagnant economy. Instead, he rallied the troops to hold out for more and to wring the taxpayers for the last drop of goodwill. They squeezed a little too tight, broke the comfortable bond with the generous taxpayers and they got more than they bargained for. Now, the genie is out of the bottle and it will take many years to stuff it back in. The silver lining for the taxpayer is that we will be more vigilant. We will continue to be generous when it comes to education but we will always remember that the the union sold out our kids for a few extra Shekels in their pension. Well done union boss, well done.

Reply

Love2read

12:38 am on Friday, September 14, 2012

@Jen, you're correct. Teachers need to work within the free market for employment that the rest of us work in. @Louis, you're misguided. My wife is a teacher. My best friend is a teacher. When we go to parties, they are filled with teachers. Believe me, I know lots of teachers and they do not work any more hours than the rest of us that are conscientious and work hard at our jobs. @ Go Scouts! Your logic is flawed. You would normally want to fix the problem, not suggest that someone take a job with a flawed compensation scale. My wife is a teacher and she knows that she is overcompensated. As I've said in other posts here on this subject, my family is grateful for all the the teaching profession has provided to us. We are also embarrassed at the outrageous pension that will be provided to our family. The big problem with the Lake Forest teachers as a whole is that while we are grateful for what teaching has provided to our family, they (the LFEA) are ungrateful. That's UNGRATEFUL, all in caps, on purpose :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff

5:45 am on Friday, September 14, 2012

@Love2read
Public Education is not part of the free market. You need to stop telling yourself that this is anything remotely like private industry. And just because your wife is a lazy teacher, that doesn't mean all teachers are. With that attitude and work ethic, it sounds like she would not fit in at at LFHS.

LF Resident/Parent

9:23 am on Friday, September 14, 2012

According to the BOE's statement they have agreed to remove the 2 Tier system and phase in the HMO contributions. Accoring to the LFEA websie they were opposed to those items. So with those items addressed isn't it time we all speak the truth that it was about the money all along?

Reply

Leave a comment