patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch.
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Opinions Fly on Possible Teachers Strike

Nerves are brittle as students and parents wait to see if there really is a work stoppage.

 

As the possibility of a teacher’s strike Lake Forest High School is less than a day away and the pictures of what such a labor stoppage would look like emerge from Chicago, opinions are flying on the matter from concerned parents, students and residents.

On a near weather perfect Monday afternoon, the people caught directly in the middle of a possible labor stoppage, the students, were obviously worried about their academic future.

Earlier: Citizen Concern for Teacher Strike Remains Low

“We’re upset that we won’t get to play Wednesday against New Trier and Oak Park Thursday,” Amanda McMahon, a member of the field hockey team, said. “We have been working hard in these games and it can determine how we place in the State Tournament.”Athletes are going to be on edge, and so are the parents.

Patch learned late today the Illinois High School Association (IHSA, the statewide prep sports governing body, said its board does not have the authority to change its bylaws and allow sports competition during a strike.

The IHSA ruling pertained to Chicago Public Schools, which went on strike Monday, but Lake Forest Community High School District 115 Board of Education President Sharon Golan said it applied to Scout teams as well.

Students walking to school Monday along the bicycle path had mixes feelings. “We’re here for an education,” said one student. “They should be for education. They shouldn’t strike.”

Another student took a different view. “I hope they do,” she said. “They deserve more money.”

Teachers Have Some Support

Meanwhile, one such parent backing the teachers is Fiona Jackson, whose child is a freshman. “It’s ridiculous,” she said. “The teachers work hard and want to be there. The school year has started so we don’t want to interrupt the flow. The School Board is throwing out too many little details; let’s just look for the big picture.”

But that was not a universal sentiment among parents. Far from it. “It’s just tragic for the students,” said Kevin Conroy, the parent of a sophomore who described his job status as ‘in transition.’ “The teachers should be grateful they have jobs.”

A woman dropping her child off at school Monday morning does not discriminate. She just wants school to continue. “They should make a deal,” she said. “They (the union and the Board) are both to blame.”

Reprisals Feared

Then there was the perspective of one parent who was afraid to give her name fearing teacher retribution against her son, who is a senior. This particular parent said she had been working since she was 15 and would love to have the situation she perceives the Lake Forest teachers to have.

“I think it is ridiculous that they are asking for more money,” the woman said. “They work in a safe environment; there are no metal detectors or gang issues. They have no reason for fear and they only work nine months out of the year.”

That same parent said she would be more sympathetic for teachers if Lake Forest High School was the top high school in the country. “Maybe they would deserve a bigger raise,” she said. “But that is not the case.”

Finally, there is the perspective of people who don’t have a direct stake in the situation anymore, but at the same time, do not want to see the community hurt.

“It’s always so sad because nobody wins and the kids always suffer because of the extracurricular activities they can’t participate in,” noted Chicago Sun-Times columnist Rick Telander, a longtime Lake Forest resident who had four children go through LFHS.

He said the financial issues facing the District are a result of the housing crisis that has caused so much damage throughout the country. “I know because of the real estate meltdown of 2007, this is a ripple effect. The money from old times just isn’t there.”

Patch Editor Steve Sadin contributed to this story.

For more news and updates from Lake Forest-Lake Bluff Patch, subscribe to our daily e-newsletter, Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Related Topics: Lake Forest Community High School District 115, Lake Forest Education Association, Lake Forest High School, and teacher strike

A concerned parent

6:18 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I think it's terrible that it has come to a strike. Are both side really negotiating in good faith? If so, there would be more meetings at the table? Have personal ego's gotten in the way? Does everyone but the teachers union realize the economic state? One teacher told me the had to vote to strike before they even saw the terms being discussed and asked for? How many teachers are just going along because of the negative backlash?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff

10:46 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@Lynette
I'm calling you crazy
Yikes

Joe

7:12 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

The teachers are using our children as leverage. Last night the board and the federal mediator were at the East Campus. The union was invited but refused saying they are not available to negotiate until late Tuesday night. Their leverage (aka our students and their education and extra curricular activities) is better 2 hours before a declared strike than it is 30 hours before. As parents and taxpayers who foot the bill for the teachers generous salaries and benefits we are getting played. If you don't like this approach speak up!

Reply

boxcar

7:28 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Fire them all! I'm sure there are 5000 teachers just as qualified that would love their cozy jobs! It's not them it's our children who are getting the grades.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George Adams

8:55 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I'm a student. Maybe you should settle down instead of spewing hate at the teachers.

Mary Kate

7:41 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

By allowing their union leaders to refuse to meet last night and continue the negotiations, the teachers who voted for this strike have permanently lost my respect. I had once held some sympathy for those who were likely being bullied by their leaders into supporting this. Not any more. Shame on all but the very few who had the courage to stand up to this.

Reply

LFHS Parent

7:47 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

It was a calculated move on the part of the union to wait until fall sports season as they know how popular it is and the fear it would cause in sports parents. As a parent with kids in sports- let them strike. My kids feel the same. They have spent the last weeks in a school where 90% of their teachers mope around and in the last week lecture them on how they don't understand what they are going through. Yes they do. THe kids are smart enough to recognize what these people who hold themselves out to be mentors, friends and tell them they are there for them; are doing to all the children of this school. They had a whole year, plus some, to get this done. Instead they wait to interrupt football, field hockey, soccer and other sports that are important to their charges. THese kids practice all summer. THey give up so much to be in these sports only to be used as pawns. I have lost all respect for the teachers and doubt I will ever regain it. A guaranteed job, benefits, a steady (large) paycheck- how many of this nation would give their right arm for this. And yes, many of those do have advanced degrees. Degrees which most teachers get to raise their pay status. Personally I would fire them all and start fresh.

Reply

James Rittner

8:08 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

The teachers union has just filed four grievances with the State of Illinois regarding violations of labor law by the Board. While this could be considered "posturing," (and I'm sure it will be by some), it will be interesting to see how the State rules on that. Should they concur that the Board has violated labor laws, I wonder if people here will acknowledge that they (the Board) have not been negotiating in good faith and are the principle reason we are at this point.

That's my belief...while I am not a teacher, I know some of them and the last thing they want to do is strike...and despite the claims of some rather mean-spirited posters, they are not greed-soaked hogs who would retaliate against their students for parents who have different opinions. They love those kids...that's why they teach, not for the glorious salary, benefits, and the joy of tussling with this truly difficult and hostile Board.

Reply
Comment_arrow

LFHS Parent

9:25 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

If they love our children so much then the teachers would have been really teaching since school began. I can tell you that in my children's classes that is not the case. In fact one of my kids had the teacher begin his class year telling them that he was old and tired of teaching- WOW that tells you a lot!!

While I agree that both sides do not come to the table with clean hands, I was also told more than once that the union timed this to happen during football season because that gets the board moving. Another WOW moment. I do have family members who are teachers in other districts and they would gladly come here with their masters degrees and phd's and teach for a fraction of what these "educators" are getting. Believe me there are plenty of great teachers out there who have asked how they apply here!

I understand that the teacher's want what is best for them, but at what cost? Parents and children alike who are suffering - be it from the inflated salaries (taxes) and benefits or from the attitudes that the teachers have given our children each day. I can tell you that not every person in this school district has a silver spoon. Times have changed so much yet our teaching staff/union isn't accepting that. In the real world jobs are not guaranteed and benefits have all but disappeared. They need to understand that any raise is great. The union this time is leading the teachers down the wrong path.

Think harder

8:14 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

The board bears responsibility for its lack of organization and foresight and the teachers seek too much. Compromise- Teachers: take less than you want; Board: give more than you'd like. Compromise is fair and reasonable and lets make it happen earlier rather than later. By the way- In case it wasn't apparent from the snafu last year, the Board needs a whole new slate.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RationalTht

9:50 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

The teachers received more than the board could afford when the economy was failing and they were still receiving large raises. It is time for the union to pay its FAIR SHARE.

Our home prices have fallen, taxpayers don't have the same money anymore - if they were not in the PUBLIC SECTOR they would realize this.

Comment_arrow

Scott

11:44 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

That is an utterly idiotic comment. That is what the unions do all the time. Ask for the moon and "settle" for a huge raise. The costs associated with our schools are MUCH TOO HIGH already. They should be getting pay cuts. The economy can not support the largess!

Me

8:21 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

In the opinion of most taxpayers, compromise would be to allow these hogs back in the building. Fire them all and start fresh by making them reapply for the jobs trey are vacating.

Reply

Lake Forest resident

9:08 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Teachers play a vital role as we entrust them with our children for the better part of the day to learn. However,they also need to get their heads out of the hole in the ground and accept that job security and pay will be tied directly to their performance like the rest of us. That day will come. We strive to teach our kids to compete, yet teachers don't understand this concept when it comes to their jobs.

Reply

Jim

9:37 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Part of me says, give them the money so we can tell the teachers "you got your increase, now shut up and do your job". Give them the increase, as long as they agree to move towards a true merit review. Let the parents be involved in teacher reviews. Why not, we are paying the taxes, we are the employer. You want increase, then put in the contract a true merit system, put in there a rule that Power School is to be updated daily, tests are returned to students, monthly class schedules - not daily, and force them to be there 30 minutes before and after school. It blows my mind that teachers don't return tests to students. How do these kids study for mid-terms and finals. Why don't they return tests, because that would force certain teachers to create new exams each semester - OMG!!! The most successful students are those who plan their week out on Sunday or Monday, some plan a monthy out, which is great if you can do it. Make the teachers give out at least a month at a glance. These kids are playing sports, working in the community, they have jobs, give them a chance to schedule their time. We, the taxpayer, need to get more return on our investment. You want more money, then we want more in return.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RationalTht

9:52 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

No more pay now for promises later - we as taxpayers can no longer afford to pay for our government masters' largess.

Comment_arrow

John Utah

1:08 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@Jim "Part of me says, give them the money so we can tell the teachers "you got your increase, now shut up and do your job".....

That is the sentiment that got us here over the last 2 decades, where you been bro? #LateToTheParty

LF Parent

10:28 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

It is interesting that this article focuses on the loss of sports activities and even suggests that the union is using that as part of its leverage to drive an 11th hour deal. Perhaps we as parents are partially to blame for the focus we tend to place on sports. I like LFHS sporting events as much as any other parent, but this issue should be about the education of our children and not what sporting events may or may not be cancelled. These situations are typically resolved through thoughtful compromise, and while it is tempting to tell the board "stand your ground" at the end of the day, delays to resolution only hurt our kids and the damage is to their pursuit of an education not a missed field hockey game.

Reply

RationalTht

10:30 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Can the board use a strike as an opportunity to get out from under the onerous healthcare benefits where we will be paying a "Cadillac" penalty? First, the teachers strike, or effectively "quit" - send them COBRA notices and IMMEDIATELY cancel all health insurance for the teachers. Now, if or when they finally come back, no longer offer the plans that will cause the district to pay penalties under the ACA.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Me

10:43 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

If a teacher wants to keep their "Cadillac" health care plan, let them pay the difference in cost plus the tax. In the real world, even the best employers don't offer those plas anymore. It is only in Teacherland where you can go on strike because you are being asked to contribute to your healthcare costs and retirement plans.

boxcar

10:43 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

In three years they'll want more money! More money,more health care, more pension income. In return for no change at all. THE OBAMA WAY! And the Unions get richer, great.

Reply

James Rittner

10:49 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

It takes two to tango, people. The teachers are ready to dance...it's the Board that has not budged from the sidelines. If you are going to use inflammatory remarks like "the children are being held hostage," then be fair and apportion the metaphor of hostage-taking to both sides.

As far as firing teachers, killing benefits, etc...regardless what happened in Wisconsin you cannot expect or hope for Lake Forest High School to become the index case for teacher union busting in Illinois. They need to work within the structure that is established now, and these ill-informed calls to treat teachers like air-traffic controllers under Reagan are not helpful and reside in a fantasy world.

I know that not a few people here have strong anti-union agendas. That's fine, that's your politics...but our community and our school district is not the place to start building your brave new world in union-heavy Illinois. If you want Illinois to become a right-to-work state, then target your energies and anger towards Springfield...not to our school.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Me

10:56 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@James - your continued call for the Board to make concessions is rather nauseating. The Board has already gone farther than most taxpayers are happy with. There is a very generous offer on the table. You keep calling for the taxpayers to make concessions. Where are your call for the union to make concessions? Face the facts and be honest (at least with yourself), you are nothing more than a union shill trying make a totally unreasonable argument somehow sound reasonable. We aren't buying it.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

11:18 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

James - the BOE is putting forward a proposal that reflects the NEW FISCAL REALITY. It is the teachers that still want the Cadillac raises and benefits. How is a pretty much guaranteed 3-4% raise per year for the next few years not GREAT in the current fiscal environment. Add to that the fact that the teachers received raises as well when EVERYONE ELSE was getting laid off or taking cuts.

Scott

11:00 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Really? Over $100k a year, about 8 months a year, 6 or 7 hour workday, no fear of being fired, top-tier health and retirement benefits, retirement at 55 years old, and a safe work environment. They have the stones to threaten us? Fire them and let them enter the real world.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bar

11:50 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Scott, plenty of the teachers work more than 8 months a year, putting in weekend, break, and summer work, and are available before (there's one teacher who is available to students at 6:30 a.m.) and after school, and communicate with students and parents any time of day or evening. All this in addition to planning lessons, preparing materials, and grading. They sponsor organizations and support our students in their academic and extra-curricular efforts that take them into the dinner hour, evenings, and Saturdays. No, not all, but plenty do. I don't know but I believe they are paid for sponsoring, but it still takes time and imagination. The rest of your statement is true, but never underestimate the time, energy, and enthusiasm these teachers bring to the school.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

12:01 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@Bar - many people making the types of salaries the teachers do work the similar hours per week, but work them for an entire year. Teachers have off AT LEAST 2-3 months a year and still pull down the salary they do. They can also do additional work during the summer to SUPPLEMENT their already high salaries.

Comment_arrow

Bar

1:14 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

To Rationaltht, You are absolutely right. I am not making a judgment on salary and benefits or comparing one career to another. I only take exception to the belief that teachers work banker's hours (oops, did I just compare careers?) and a grade-school student calendar. The school year for teachers is mid-August till several days after finals in June (yeah, minus winter and spring break, unless you are escorting our kids on a trip), and the 7.5-hour instruction day is only part of their work day.

I only want the BOE and the LFEA to fulfill their joint responsibility that they've have a couple of years to work on now, including more than a one-year extension. In the real world, to use many commenters' expression, if we don't complete our project on time, we can lose our job. If our students don't complete a project on time, they get an F.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

4:12 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@Bar - if a teacher works "extra" during breaks and such, taking kids on trips, don't they earn additional compensation. That was my understanding from talking with the debate coach.

Concerned Parent

11:07 am on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I would imagine there are thousands of unemployed teachers out there that would love the chance to teach at LFHS, on a merit based system. The corporate world as well as the rest of the world has moved forward. The days of guaranteed raises, cost of living raises, pensions and fully paid benefits are behind us. These folks need to get real.

Reply

mshoe

12:26 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

If you take the time to read what both sides have offered, you would see that at the end of the "board's contract" they would be in a surplus state of 23 million dollars. Schools are a non-profit entity and run as such. Those funds are in the fund for the teacher's salaries. If you think the school is in a short-fall and unable to pay their bills, take that anger out on the state. NOT the teachers. NOT the students. The board is not working in good faith. IF they were, lawsuits wouldn't have been filed..with approval of the mediator. Address the issues, where the money is coming from is not one of them. If you didn't value the education your children were receiving at LFHS you would have moved already.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Me

12:31 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@mshoe - Huh????? You are saying that since there are funds available that they should be distributed to the teachers? Those funds don't belong to the teachers, the superintendent or the School Board. They belong to the taxpayers. If we use your twisted logic, does it mean that when there is a deficit that the teachers will ante up and cover it? Probably not. You would then say it is up to the taxpayers to dig deep and pay more.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

12:51 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@mshoe - The board sent something out showing how the union was using faulty numbers - basically, counting a surplus of around $7,000,000/year that did not exist. There goes your $23,000,000.

As for "lawsuits would not have been filed" line - right. Teachers are using those as bargaining chips, hoping Obama's NLRB will give them a pass and screw the taxpayers. It is time for the teachers TO PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE.

Comment_arrow

Deadcatbounce

1:40 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I was wondering mshoe, how much debt does the district have? Can the surplus be used to pay off debt and cut the property tax rate? I know the school did a major upgrade a while back. I'm sure there is at least 10 years or more of debt outstanding. Wasn't there a referendum for the renovation to increase taxes within the last 10 years?

Louis G. Atsaves

12:50 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Since we are only received filtered news through the union and school board on this subject, the most logical thing to do for the public is to demand that all negotiations be conducted in public in full view of an audience of residents. Then we can determine what the true issues are and who is being unreasonable.

Reply

John Utah

1:03 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Here's some info I would like those who side with the teachers to please respond to. Salary Data for 1 of LFHS tenured teachers, +25 years (name withheld) from the "Open The Books" app:

2011 - $149,852
2010 - $141,370
2009 - $133,368
2007 - $120,178
2006 - $113,871
2005 - $105,700

Since 2007 and the Great Recession, this person's income has gone up every year by $6-9k guaranteed. 2012 is listed yet, but based on the trend we are looking at $155,000 at least easy. Since 2005, that has been a 47% increase. Anybody else get these kind of salary increases JUST FOR SHOWING UP TO WORK? There are no more evaluations with this person since tenure has taken over.

This individual is nearing retirement and is clearly trying to cook the books one more time before heading to Florida, as the pension will be based on the 4 last four years of service. How anybody thinks the teachers at LFHS are somehow disadvantaged is a testament to how mindless we have become as a nation when these facts stare someone right in the face and they don't believe them.

Reply

Gary

1:17 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

You be the judge. This information can be found at: http://www.familytaxpayers.org/salary.php

Rnk Name Salary Yrs Assignment
1 Filippo Anthony 168740 33 Physical Education
2 Richards Evan 153016 35 Physics (Grades 9-12 Only)
3 Benson Rhonda 151701 31 Driver Education
4 Clark Diane 151530 31 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
5 Gress Charles 149852 30 Calculus (Grades 9-12 Only)
6 Papp Barbara 146724 36 Guidance Counselor
7 Brandes David 142452 23 Guidance Counselor
8 Gibson Laura 142201 33 Calculus (Grades 9-12 Only)
9 Straus Robin 140166 33 Physical Education
10 Spagnoli Charles 137607 21 Physical Education
11 Kuhl Mark 136593 26 World History (Grades 9-12 Only)
12 Gantt Lloyd 135403 40 World History (Grades 9-12 Only)
13 Kopriva Karen 134449 32 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
14 Cooney Tamar 134325 21 Biology (Grades 9-12 Only)
15 Jerch Janie 134242 26 Geometry (Grades 9-12 Only)
16 Clegg Stephen 133945 18 Economics (Grades 9-12 Only)
17 Mueller Rebecca 132581 26 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
18 Antrim Wendy 132483 28 Art
19 Naughton Bradley 132076 17 Guidance Counselor
20 Littel Kerry 131418 5 Librarian/Media Specialist
21 Johnson Pamela 131344 30 Learning Behavior Specialist I
22 Heroux Kathryn 130695 21 Chemistry (Grades 9-12 Only)
23 Coad Daniel 130594 29 Calculus (Grades 9-12 Only)
24 Haskett Timothy 130099 27 Vocal Music
25 Nawor Mary Beth 129965 17 Environmental Science

Reply
Comment_arrow

Me

1:29 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Lets crunch these numbers a little. Three of the top ten earners teach PE and number three teaches drivers ed. Only three of the top ten are actually teachers of core subjects. If we expand it out to the top twenty five, just over half are actually teaching the core subjects.

I would gladly stratify the pay scales even further and up the pay for math, science and history teachers but I would cut the pay of PE, drivers ed and the like.

Comment_arrow

Bob

2:20 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

This is the problem, #1 is a Gym teacher and #3 is a Driver's Ed instructor.
WTF!
Who is running this nut house? Fire the teachers and then fire the administration!!!!

Comment_arrow

LFHS Student

9:54 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I think it should be noted that the teachers on this list are all very good, qualified teachers, some of which have dedicated 3+ decades to teaching at the high school. I know that they have bettered me, and I appreciate that immensely. Statements like "fire all the teachers" or "fire the administration" are insane and extremist. I love my teachers, I don't want them going anywhere.

Gary

1:17 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Rnk Name Salary Yrs Assignment
26 Hoak Bradford 129221 34 Physics (Grades 9-12 Only)
27 Zare Debra 129129 22 Art
28 Freedman Keith 128428 22 Algebra
29 Hawkins David 127865 33 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
30 Westrich Andrea 127651 23 Spanish
31 Jensen Elizabeth 127347 30 Geometry (Grades 9-12 Only)
32 Woodruff Philip 127245 20 Latin
33 Landvick Ariel 127011 20 Latin
34 Osing Mark 126009 27 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
35 Berkshire Jacqueline 125969 29 Guidance Counselor
36 McKee Kelly 125130 22 World History (Grades 9-12 Only)
37 Donlon William 124643 14 Student Dean
38 Macius Albert 123814 29 Algebra
39 Thumm Linda 123326 28 Learning Behavior Specialist I
40 Webster Trent 123291 24 Driver Education
41 Horan Sandra 122846 23 Learning Behavior Specialist I
42 Yavetsky Andre 122743 19 Spanish
43 Wagemann Robert 121480 18 Guidance Counselor
44 Brown Denise 121219 15 Guidance Counselor
45 Bower Diane 120567 6 Nurse
46 McHaney Tamara 120541 26 Learning Behavior Specialist I
47 Wolfe Elizabeth 120137 16 Biology (Grades 9-12 Only)
48 Gilbert Scott 118609 15 Learning Behavior Specialist I
49 Del Fava Raymond 116977 4 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
50 Lesniak Frank 115420 10 Learning Behavior Specialist I

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shirley

11:16 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@LFHS student (if that is truly who you are): I had 3 children in the district. My opinion differs severely with yours. Yes, there are some excellent teachers on that list of 25, but there are some awful human beings and horrible teachers. Which...is why we need a subjective measure for evaluation!
But, more to the point, our Board has made a more than generous offer. I'm not sure, but I think the teachers have 100% of their health care paid, too. These are TREMENDOUS salaries in any economic environment. Dear LFHS Student: once you are on your own & paying your own way, you will quickly learn that most people do not have a "job for life" anymore; one's performance is continually evaluated.

Gary

1:18 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Rnk Name Salary Yrs Assignment
51 Kessler Janene 114867 16 Instrumental Music
52 Jones Kimberly 114261 16 Learning Behavior Specialist I
53 Koerner Mary 113610 22 German
54 Snell Jennifer 113414 11 Algebra
55 Chantler Julie 113140 10 Learning Behavior Specialist I
56 Lindsey Shelly 113044 6 Algebra
57 Clegg Laura 112843 12 Student Dean
58 Knight Jennifer 112020 11 Student Dean
59 Ferges Lance 111065 13 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
60 Davenport Candice 110663 8 Environmental Science
61 Miles Megan 109957 11 Guidance Counselor
62 Finley Christopher 109777 13 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
63 Flangel Laura 107596 17 Sociology (Grades 9-12 Only)
64 Maigler Daniel 105937 8 Social Worker
65 Doucette Melissa 105762 16 Art
66 Moore Richard 105334 12 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
67 Gigiano Thomas 104785 13 World History (Grades 9-12 Only)
68 Schuessler Kurt 104528 8 Biology (Grades 9-12 Only)
69 Birtman Amy 104321 26 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
70 Barndt Darren 103829 14 Cabinet Maker/Millworker
71 Sandler Leslie 102897 19 Spanish
72 Eccleston Jane 102732 11 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
73 Ferrari Matthew 102452 16 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
74 Slater Bridget 102430 17 Algebra
75 Werner Ray 102245 12 Physical Education

Reply

Gary

1:18 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Rnk Name Salary Yrs Assignment
76 Van Nuys Stephen 101810 9 U.S. History (Grades 9-12 Only)
77 Douglass Stephen 101430 6 Radio & TV Broadcasting
78 Clark Carol 101263 8 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
79 Sheeran Denis 101185 12 Algebra
80 Lowry Matthew 101008 13 Physics (Grades 9-12 Only)
81 Ruda Bradley 100534 13 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
82 Sorensen Rebecca 100379 6 Chemistry (Grades 9-12 Only)
83 Micksch Nancy 99914 10 World History (Grades 9-12 Only)
84 Lawrenz Michelle 98669 10 Learning Behavior Specialist I
85 Bielski Carolyn 98605 14 Art
86 Wise Andrea 96995 10 Spanish
87 De Rosa Joseph 96025 6 U.S. History (Grades 9-12 Only)
88 Dukats Mara 94973 7 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
89 Secker Katherine 94806 10 Learning Behavior Specialist I
90 Runft Brian 94656 6 Trigonometry (Grades 9-12 Only)
91 Song Heather 94413 12 French
92 Lemke Andrea 94255 6 Calculus (Grades 9-12 Only)
93 Johnson Todd 94031 12 Cabinet Maker/Millworker
94 Levinson Marni 93795 12 Spanish
95 Dunn Stephen 93551 13 Political Science/Civics (Grades 9-12 Only)
96 Wanninger John 93288 5 English (Grades 9-12 Only)
97 Alexander Collier Cindy 93208 9 U.S. History (Grades 9-12 Only)
98 Foster Steven 92016 11 Learning Behavior Specialist I
99 Patel Nitin 91681 8 Chemistry (Grades 9-12 Only)
100 Bassill Robert 91500 8 Instrumental Music

Reply
Comment_arrow

LFHS STUDENT

9:28 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@Gary who the hell do you think you are. Posting all the salaries of the teachers at LFHS. I'm a student there and how would you like it if I went around snooping in your life.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

9:35 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@LFHS Student - first, all of the information is "public" since tax dollars are used. Second, such information helps taxpayers understand where the teachers are starting from. The LFEA keeps saying the board is lying, so this provides another source of data.

Comment_arrow

Stevie Janowski

10:38 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@lfhs student, if you worked for the government, I would look up what you made too. Its public record kid, get with it. Thanks for posting gary

Comment_arrow

LFHS STUDENT

6:56 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

@Stevie Janowski- who are you honestly i like my teachers and I would rather have them in my community then any one of you "Concerned Citizens", who havent even met these teachers.

James Rittner

1:25 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Actually "me," the funds now belong to the school. You funded them through your taxes, but the money is not yours anymore. Your say in how the monies are used is limited to your votes for the school board membership, and any petition you make during their meetings.

You could cut the teachers' pay down to slave wages and you wouldn't see any difference on your tax bill. The money comes from the property assessment...if you want lower property taxes, the only way you will get them is to convince the County to devalue your home. The District will take the same amount from all taxpayers regardless of what teacher pay is.

There are a lot of calls here for teachers to be paid "like everyone else in the real world." The motivation seems to be a desire to downgrade the teaching profession, or make them "sacrifice like we have."

Aside from the fact that the teachers already took a pay freeze last year, these are emotional arguments and not relevant to a contract negotiation. What you or any other taxpayer earns or doesn't earn at their job is not a factor in creating a public school teacher compensation package. What IS a factor is what other schools are doing...and in that regard, the LFHS offer is way behind.

It's not just the pay...actually I think the pay is the most negotiable of all of it...it's the two-tier system for new hires and the renegotiation clause which effectively bust the union. This is not the time or place to attack teacher unions. Just make a deal.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Utah

1:40 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@James - When we say "paid like everyone else in the real world", we mean on a free market basis (ala no unions) per individual contract. We mean paying a share of health insurance and retirement benefits that is consistent with private sector. We mean yearly evaluations, the ability to fire someone for poor performance, and the ability for teachers to change districts freely if they want to for better pay and benefits. We mean COMPETITION FOR SERVICES and paid how the FREE MARKET operates per situation, not like public sector unions do (which even FDR opposed because its govt negotiating with govt).

C'mon man, you should be smarter than this.

Comment_arrow

LTH

2:46 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@ John - The current system is based of the idea of the free market as well, only in a different way. In order to attract the best teachers, LFHS must be competitive with other schools in the area of similiar standing. The problem is, by creating this 2-tiered system, the high school will not be competitive, and will no longer be nearly as attractive to potential hires.

James Rittner

1:39 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Sure, the teachers make a lot of money. This isn't news. They make a lot of money in every high school district around here, all of which will have a very similary top 100 salaries.

So...you are saying teachers are overpaid, should be paid less...on what grounds? Because you are amazed at their salaries? Because you don't make as much? Because you think they are lazy or unworthy?

NONE of these are reasons you can bring to a contract negotiation. Our Board can't stonewall the teachers because you don't like their high pay. They need a financial justification to make contract cuts. THAT is what is at issue here, and what is being disputed. Even our "evil board" knows that...and you'll notice that they are not using any of these arguments, because they know they are irrelevant. It's about finances.

That's all it can be about. I'm sorry you don't like what teachers get paid. Welcome to the reality of the north shore, for the past 40 years. Find a better argument, because your anger or envy or disdain for high teacher pay cannot be a factor in a negotiation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Deadcatbounce

1:43 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Well you can say on the grounds of supply and demand. There are lots of unemployed teachers out there, that would love a job in this HS.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

9:38 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

The board is not "cutting" the contract though - there is a new set of negotiations. It is also not "just about finances" - there is also a matter of "fairness" (don't Democrats / liberals LOVE "fairness"?).

James Rittner

1:54 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Ok, then what? Go ahead and fill the school with cheaper teachers. Really cheap ones d you can. Nothing changes for you. You pay the same taxes regardless. So what is your dog in this hunt, really?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Me

2:16 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@James - You keep spouting this trash that a decrease in salary expense will not lead to a decrease in taxes. Taxes are assessed at the level necessary to fund budgets. If there are less salaries in the budgets, the millage is decreased and taxes go down (or at least the level of increase is slowed). Your proposal that since we have the money we should just pay it to the teachers is absurd. Equally absurd is your lemming-like concept that we should engage in a nuclear arms race styled contest to see who can pay the teachers the very highest salaries.

Comment_arrow

John Utah

2:16 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Our viewpoint is that eventually property and income tax rates could fall in line with the reduced spending. Would obviously take some strong effort politically, most likely from staunch conservatives. But if you are of the viewpoint that nothing can ever be changed, then by all means let's keep increasing their salaries and getting the inevitable financial implosion over with so I can deal with it now instead of when I'm older. Just keep flooding the system baby, until it reaches it's breaking point....

Comment_arrow

LTH

2:49 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

It should also be pointed out that "cheaper teachers" really means less experienced ones, ones who aren't as good at teaching.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

4:20 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@LTH - as "Gary" posted above, does a PE teacher with 33 years of service actually do that much better than someone with 15-20 years? What about that Drivers Ed teacher with 31 years of service?

Again, in the PRIVATE sector, eventually pay bands level off recognizing that no additional education or experience leads to additional "productivity".

Comment_arrow

LTH

4:48 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@RationalTht - The difference in this situation though is that "productivity" is not the only metric being used. Indeed, often the difference between a bad teacher and a great teacher have something more to do with the intangibles. Further, the above list simplifies the descriptions of many teachers. Many teachers who teach Physical education also teach other courses, including Health and Shop, along with whatever coaching it is that they do.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

5:29 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@LTH - the thing is, currently, only seniority is really used to "evaluate" for pay raises. "Productivity" may not be the best word - I guess you could say "teaching effectiveness". Changing the term still leads to the same argument though, a teacher can only become _so_ effective - some would even argue that eventually the teachers become LESS effective.

LF Resident/Parent

2:01 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

The salaries above listed are accurate but they do include coaching and extra duties. And all LFEA teachers salaries were frozen last school year.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RationalTht

4:22 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Ah, so after the 5-8% raises for the prior few years (when taxpayers were losing jobs, taking pay cuts, etc), the teachers had ONE year of a pay freeze?

Quick question (I honestly don't know) - did that "freeze" still allow for "increases" due to years of experience, additional education, etc? Was it a REAL freeze, or only a freeze on the general increase? Teachers get so many different raises each year, we need to clarify.

John Utah

2:12 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@James, at some point the guaranteed $6-9k increases have to be stopped, it's just that simple. At some point, paying these increased salaries, benefits, and pensions is going to cost someone, most likely in higher property taxes or some lower level teachers job. We're trying to prevent this, and the teachers are being unreasonable. When public employees start making more than the private sector employees that pay their salary, something is going to eventually give.

Reply

James Rittner

2:20 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I've said my piece...it's clear that what rankles people here is that a group of well-paid employees are about to go on strike, as if somehow fighting for a better contract than the one offered is not within their rights, or is something they don't deserve.

I don't know if the same anger or resistance would be present if this was a blue collar union, or even a Wal-Mart (which isn't unionized). I doubt it. There seems to be some kind of line, in this group anyway, that declares that once you make a certain amount of money, take it or leave it. I sincerely hope none of you find yourself in this position someday, where your employer (and the community or clientele that backs them) decides that you've made enough, and if you don't like it, leave, we'll find someone cheaper to take your place.

Perhaps that's already happened to some of you. And maybe that's why we see all this distrust and derision for a group of generally peaceful and caring individuals who have, in the end, devoted their lives to our children.

That you would run them out, replace them with less experienced and more transient staff, just to see that money now spent on more office furniture and landscaping, is a sorry thing indeed. Sorry because it speaks to a resentment that has no logic...you won't see a dime more or less in your pockets no matter what the outcome of this strike.

Consider what drives that resentment. It's not the teachers or the Board.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Utah

2:24 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

" I sincerely hope none of you find yourself in this position someday, where your employer (and the community or clientele that backs them) decides that you've made enough, and if you don't like it, leave, we'll find someone cheaper to take your place."

Happens everyday in the private sector buddy, welcome to the free market. If you produce, you won't be in that situation. Your public sector and union-only experience is greatly showing now...

Comment_arrow

John Utah

2:29 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

"as if somehow fighting for a better contract than the one offered is not within their rights, or is something they don't deserve"

It is certainly within their rights to negotiate, but it's within our rights to reject it.

Comment_arrow

John Utah

2:34 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

"Sorry because it speaks to a resentment that has no logic...you won't see a dime more or less in your pockets no matter what the outcome of this strike"

So why do I care then what any public employee makes or how efficient they run things? Since taxes can never be adjusted to reduced spending, let's pay them all $200k and be the #1 district in the USA! These teachers are just so peaceful and caring, unlike us greedy, selfish taxpayers....

Comment_arrow

John Utah

2:38 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

"I don't know if the same anger or resistance would be present if this was a blue collar union, or even a Wal-Mart (which isn't unionized). I doubt it."

Yes there would be. Unions killed Detroit and the state of Michigan, GM and Chrysler living proof. Unions have bankrupted CA cities, and now whole states. If Wal-Mart went union, their retail prices would go through the roof, punishing millions of lower income (and higher income) people that shop there and save more, live better (so true).

Keep it coming...

Comment_arrow

LTH

2:59 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

John, I agree with you on one thing: if Walmart allowed members to unionize, prices would go up. But not because of the union itself. It would be because of the current practices of Walmart, such as keeping many people who currently work the same hours as full-time employees labeled as "part-time". This means Walmart doesn't have to pay them as much, or provide health insurance for, people who do the exact same amount of work as other employees.

Comment_arrow

BJ Tyler

3:03 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

" I sincerely hope none of you find yourself in this position someday, where your employer (and the community or clientele that backs them) decides that you've made enough, and if you don't like it, leave, we'll find someone cheaper to take your place."

@James...are you referring to America? or merely any non collectivist nation?

Comment_arrow

John Utah

3:13 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@LTH, so right because of the union, like I said.

Comment_arrow

LTH

3:18 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@John - It's more Walmart's current policies treat their employees in a profoundly unjust way, to the point that multiple groups have spoken against these unfair employment practices.

Comment_arrow

Me

3:55 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@little lth - Read this quote from an article about Walmart "The company's decision fits in with a larger historical narrative of the past decade, said Elise Gould, the director of health policy research at the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal research group partly funded by unions. As company's strive to hold onto profits amid increasingly costly health care, she said, the brunt of the pain is passed along to the employee -- and to the American taxpayer. In the past decade, there has been a substantial increase in the number of employees who lost employer health care, went on public assistance or did without any insurance at all." This is the real world. These people are workers and taxpayers. They can ill afford to take care of themselves yet the teacher's union is demanding that they pay for Cadillac health plans and noncontributory pensions.

We can't afford it anymore. When you actually get into the work force and you will gain a perspective that you don't yet have.

Comment_arrow

LTH

4:24 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@Me - I am in the workforce. I hold a full time job. I pay for my own food. I pay my taxes. And I graduated from Lake Forest. And just so you know, the quote you gave outlined the ways in which Walmart does mistreat it's employees in an effort to bulk up their profit. And by doing so, they make taxpayers pay more money to support their employees who get sick, hurt, or can't afford other basic human needs.

LFHS Parent and Resident

2:23 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

The salaries are absurd!! And those numbers do not include all benefits. There is no question there are some wonderful teachers - but to ask for more money on top of the raises they have already received in this economy is more absurd. Get rid of all of them and let them find reality. LF Resident and Parent

Reply

Jim of LF

2:35 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

How sad it is that our teachers are being held hostage by their own union. First, the word is that the union held its strike vote with no secret ballot- resulting in tremendous peer pressure on the teachers to vote "yes"- while communicating, explicitly or implicitly, that the vote was "just for leverage." Now their leadership is playing childish games- refusing to meet last night, let alone over the weekend- claiming they want parents to be involved and "attend the Board meeting..." Let's translate that: they hope that parents will pressure the Board at zero hour into meeting the Union's demands.

Teachers, there are people in our community who don't have health care, in contrast to you, who enjoy several of your health care choices paid for 100% by we taxpayers. Others are desperate for jobs, in contrast to you, scorning the 3% or so raise being offered. Your Union's demand for 6% insults us- and yes, it is 6% when you add up the piece parts.

Here's a prediction: in that teachers lose about 2%-3% of their annual pay each week this goes on, look for the Union to demand that teachers be made whole as a final condition to returning to work. The Union wanted a strike from day one, still feeling burned from last year. We don't need parents to pressure the Board; we need teachers to pressure their union to wake-up and realize that LF homeowners aren't sheep to be fleeced. Teachers: we may support you, but your union is a disgrace.

Reply

Stevie Janowski

2:54 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I hope people are taking note about how outraged the community is that these teachers would even think about striking. Fire them all if they dont want to be at LFHS and get paid the second highest wage in the state. Give me a break teachers, your a teacher, feel blessed to make over 75k!

Reply

John Utah

2:55 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@Gary - great job. People seeing these salaries now know what we are dealing with here. These teachers are not disadvantaged. The Silent Majority will be silent no more as more and more people see these figures. Everybody, this will be the hot topic this week, this weekend, until this is resolved. Share this information! When rational people see this, taxpayers will win...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gary

3:55 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I did NOT want to do this. Let the record show that I waited until the last minute. The lawsuits were the last straw for me.

I try as hard as I can to use ideas and principles to sway people, and I hate picking on individuals to score political points. I really do.

But the unions have brought lawsuits against us, and the demonization and intimidation of honest board members, taxpaying citizens, and parents has begun. They are using every available political tool they have to hurt us as badly as they possibly can, as seen with the timing of the strike with regard to the the school year and sports programs. They intend to make an example of our community for the rest of the State to follow. We need to fight back with every tool we have.

Remember, the teachers chose this path, we did not.

BJ Tyler

3:00 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Wow! I'm not sure there is a clearer example of how grossly out of line public employee compensation is from the real world (read private sector). Gym teachers and Drivers ed instructors making over 150k/yr??? If only I wasn't paying over 40k/year in prop taxes, I might find this mildly amusing.

Reply

John Utah

3:10 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Teachers Reading This - Please know that if you strike, there is a good chance this will become national news. Because of the Chicago strike going national, this will be an easy add-on story about how out of touch Illinois public sector teacher unions are, right in the President's home state.

Just warning you come later this week, your public salary might really go public....

Reply

linda

3:33 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I'm reading these comments, and shocked at the venom in our community. I'm a teacher, a Lake Forest native (family came in the 1840s), and I love my job. As I teach my students to recognize opinion from fact, and to deal with others in a respectful way, I am constantly amazed at the adults in our town who never learned to do that. Our country has become so hate-filled - people can't have intelligent differences of opinion....there's a judgment call on everything. I laugh when I see people saying to "fire 'em all!" ("off with their heads!")......Having had four children go through the high school and grade school systems, I find THAT to be the most ludicrous statement - bring in anybody and everybody with an education degree - these professionals can be replaced! Really?? How would all of you like that sentiment in your workplaces? Could happen, CEOs and bankers, and management people. Please let cooler heads prevail. I'm using your comments in my third grade classroom this week, to show that many adults have never learned important lessons about respect for others.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Me

3:45 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Ahhh. So now we are being scolded by the third grade teacher because we have the audacity to stand up to the omnipotent teacher's union. You are showing how out of touch with reality you are when you ask how we would like it if the sentiment that we are all replaceable existed in our workplaces. Earth to Linda but that is exactly the sentiment in our workplaces. It is the reality in the real world. We are all replaceable. Only in Teacherland does the concept that only you can do this job exist.

Comment_arrow

BJ Tyler

3:58 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@Linda...I'm not trying to be rude, but may I ask why you felt it necessary to point out your family's extended LF history? I'm not exactly sure how the fact that your family came to LF in the 1840s is relevant to this discussion.

Comment_arrow

Gary

4:27 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

" I'm using your comments in my third grade classroom this week, to show that many adults have never learned important lessons about respect for others."

So now we have a teacher in our community calling for respect for teachers while admitting that she is using this issue to turn our children against us. That's a firing offense. You had better watch your step.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

4:29 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Well, the only HS teacher named Linda is Linda Thumm who has taught for 23yrs, is a "Learning Behavior Specialist I", and earns around $123K before 100% benefits and a "Cadillac" pension.

Comment_arrow

LTH

4:54 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

To all other who have responded to this comment: This is too far. Respect is something that we all deserve. You can say you disagree with someone's views, or something they say, but the moment you make it personal and attack that person themselves, you have crossed the line between accepted public speech and bullying.

Comment_arrow

Bob

4:59 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Linda,

The problem is the unreasonableness of the positions of the union against the reality of the salaries they are getting. For so long, it was argued that teachers were not going to make market salaries, so they deserved good pensions. It now appears that the teachers have fooled us!

They have great salaries and great pensions. This is not what we bargained for. And when I look at the best teachers that my kids have had, they are all getting paid the least.

Comment_arrow

Stevie Janowski

5:54 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@linda Whats your real name? I need to know to pull my children out of your class

kathryn

4:15 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Is this the same Linda that ditched the teaching job for a Real Estate Hat only to come scrambling back years later to jump back on the free money,"pension train?"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Me

5:06 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

They are probably one and the same. My guess is that once she saw what the real world was like she beat a hasty retreat for Teacherland.

Mary Kate

4:25 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@ Mr. Ritter, regarding your above comment: "... I'm sorry you don't like what teachers get paid. Welcome to the reality of the north shore, for the past 40 years. Find a better argument, because your anger or envy or disdain for high teacher pay cannot be a factor in a negotiation."

Well, high teacher pay is a HUGE problem that needs to be addressed because of the Illinois pension situation. The BoE is being responsible in recognizing that pension reform is at some point going to have to shift pension liabilities from the state to local responsibility. They are actually doing the MORAL thing in this regard because wealthy areas like the North Shore have been spiking pay without having to worry about bearing the full cost of the pensions that the high pay creates. And poorer parts of the state have been left to pay the price of our irresponsibility. I guess the LF union likes to think that they are just taking money from "rich" people who somehow deserve to pay. But, how does it make you feel to know that your inflated pay currently is making poor people in other parts of the state pay more to feather your nests?

Reply
Comment_arrow

RationalTht

4:32 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

While I do not agree with spiking the pay, it should be noted that the "wealthy" areas really get zero money from the state. Not only do we pay for our own schools, we pay for most everybody else's. That SHOULD give us the first crack at the best teachers.

Comment_arrow

Mary Kate

4:59 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

That's not really true, RationalTht. You are correct that wealthy areas get very little from the state with respect to salaries. But the pension liability is a very different story under current law.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

5:24 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@Mary Kate - sorry, I was unclear. I was meant to refer specifically to salaries. I understand with the exception of Chicago I believe, all other pensions are handled by the state.

Comment_arrow

Nancy H

7:10 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@Rational, no worries about that. It is a complex subject area that I wasn't fully informed about either until the union forced this. I was shocked to learn that because of the different treatment of salary vs. pensions in Illinois, the North Shore could engage in these circular firing squads of paying teachers outrageous amounts as each came under contact talks without having to take the total actuarial value of the contract into account. So now, while poor farming towns in central Illinois might get a lot more state money for salaries (still WAY lower than what our teachers get), we here on the North Shore stick them with a share of the inflated pensions we created in good times when we could cover these crazy salaries with our property values.

The union likes to deride us, saying how spoiled and rich we are here in LF (if only they knew how so many of us really are just hanging on!). If people become informed, maybe they will see what the union is imposing on ALL of Illinoisans too. In this way, the only way I can feel even slightly good about this awful conflict is that maybe Lake Forest will be the one with the courage to take a stand and be responsible.

kathryn

4:48 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I find all of this exhausting!! My Father used to say, "there are 2 things you need to remember, the world is full of a_ _ _ _ _ _ s and EVERYONE can be replaced." Funny thing is, when all the Ninnies out there re-elect OBAMA, we're all f_ _ _ _ _ and none of this will matter. ;-)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shirley

11:41 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@kathryn: I do not agree with the teachers on this matter. I'm a strong Obama supporter, a Lake Forester, AND grew up in unionized Detroit with a union-teacher-mother! Our situation here is unique to Lake Forest. This is not about "union-busting" or the President. It is about fundamental fairness. The truth has come out.
@Gary: I wish you had posted the salaries days ago!! I knew they were high. But holy c&&p!!! Now I'm madder-than-a-hornet!!!

linda

6:02 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

brought up family history to respond to the charming comment about how the h.s. teachers "shouldn't be allowed in 'our' town." Whose town? We all belong. The venom continues with comments to anyone who tries to speak rationally about discourse. For all of us who are passionate about teaching, and trying to prepare children to create a better world, keep up your attacks. They indicate your .concern for those children - sure, they do.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stevie Janowski

6:08 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Linda please share with us your last name, as I have special interest in you as my son is also in third grade. I do not approve of you teaching him or any of the students your opinion. Please enlighten us so we don't have to figure it out ourselves and call the superintendent.

JohnP1

6:03 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Anyone have the top 100 list for CTU teacher's salary for comparison?

I would also bet that other northern suburb school teachers at Stevenson or New Trier do equally well like the LF teachers.

Reply

linda

6:53 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Showed my husband and grown kids this site, and advised them to subscribe so they could see, first hand, what happens when one dares to question histrionics. For the record, I'm the one who worked while my husband went to grad school, and I'm the one who finally graduated at age 33. Had several jobs in the "real world" during all those years. Wanted to be a teacher since I was a first grade student at St. Mary's. Hit me with your best shot on my motives. Please take a look at the
"man" (woman?) in the mirror, and ask why my concern about civility brings out such caustic remarks. For those thinking I should be fired, what is your rational reason? Is it because I teach children to respect other people? Ouch. Scary times for those of us who believe in kindness and concern for others. None of the teachers at LFHS (or any other school) made their career choice for the big bucks and benefits. To say that that was their motivation is totally irrational. Look at any dedicated teacher and you will see a passion that is unstoppable. Please treat them with dignity. You can dislike their request for pay and equity with a tiered system, but stop the ugliness. It's so distasteful.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nancy H

7:29 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I'm sorry, Linda. You sound like a caring person and dedicated teacher. But, just understand that people are on edge right right now and it really freaks people out when it sounds like you are talking about strike issues at the HS with 3rd graders. I'm thinking this probably isn't what you meant to say. But that is how sort of sounded on the receiving end ...

Comment_arrow

Kt

9:15 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Linda, thank you for allowing us to come back to the view point of what this is all about. We are a community blessed with great schools and wonderful teachers. I sympathize with the plight of what teachers deal with on a daily basis, let alone with some of the ugly, unappreciative comments on this site. As my father said, there is a difference between money and class, money is easy to obtain, but class, that's another story. Many have showed us this through their comments tonight.
Of course, all of this this can be a teachable moment within your character ed. program of how adults treat each other with differing points of view. I grew up in Lake Forest, and I can tell you, the parents of my generation never showed the dsrespect toward to teachers as this generation does. Very sad message and role modeling to our youth! Many frustrated peolple with their life situations taking their venom out on others. So many people not listening to the facts, but making quick judgements. Thank you to you and all the other teachers who work tirelessly for the children in our town. You're in a very under paid and, unfortunatley by some, undervalued profession. Sad...

Comment_arrow

Stevie Janowski

9:25 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Omg you have a husband and "grown kids" Heres my best shot Linda, what is your name. You walk the walk now talk the talk. -Stevie

Scott

6:54 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Perhaps WE, the TAXPAYER should go on strike.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stevie Janowski

9:24 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

That is a great line, I am gonna start using that. I agree scott

Me

7:35 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Request??? Is that how you define "give us what we want or else we will walk out on the children that we are here to teach"?

Here in the real world there are loads of examples of a "tiered" system. When economic conditions changed, most companies could no longer afford traditional pensions so they switched to defined contribution plans. The existing employees were grandfathered in and new hires didn't have access. Economic times are forcing a change in Teacherland as well. The existing employees could agree to the new system or they could say no and there would need to be a bifurcated system where new hires take longer to reach the top pay levels. So you see, it is the teachers who are forcing the tiered system on the new hires because they refuse to accept change. They are saying that there are entitled to the same deal forever even though the taxpayers who fund their salaries, pensions and health plans are living in the reality of the real world.

I have no animosity toward teachers as people, only toward their greed and unwillingness accept reality.

Reply

Concerned

8:08 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I am so saddened by the vitriol that is being spewed here. Threatening to "get a person fired" is exactly the mentality that drives good teachers out of Lake Forest, or any place for that matter, and that phrase in the community is far too common. Providing food for teachers on a half day is great and all, but acutally supporting them goes a long way.

The problem here is that both sides have a valid point. The economy is not good, and people are moving out of Lake Forest. Hence, less money. Which makes sense. But many of the teachers on that list have been on staff at LFHS for years... upwards of multiple decades... so it isn't really fair to compare that to a new teacher right out of college. However, what the BOE is proposing is to create a new salary schedule for new teachers... that, to me, sounds unfair to them. Many of you are complaining about the teachers, and screaming for the board to hire new ones. Here's the bottom line - for what you all demand out of your teachers (and what has been done in the past when those demands are not met, for real and through rumor), NO ONE is going to stay for long... its like charter schools. They hire new teachers, burn them out, and push them out. Lake Forest should want to attract teachers who stay for their entire careers (good teacher, mind you), who get to the top of the salary scale.

Just a different perspective.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Think harder

11:38 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

These people don't understand market economies. Teachers will go where the pay is like those "non-union" shops like HP or Deerfield. I don't want the HP and Deerfield cast-offs.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

6:46 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

@Think harder - I hate to break it to you, but some Deerfield schools score BETTER that LF on tests. They pay less and get more.

I.M. Weasel

8:39 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@concernerned - relax, Linda can't be fired. She is tenured, remember? Even if she wasn't, it is hardly a capital offense for her to speak her mind. I am more concerned by the HS teachers who are pleading their case to the students there.

Reply

Concerned Citizen

8:39 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

As with other policy issues, facts are crucial, but rarely revealed. First, what are teachers at LFHS paid? Since they are public employees, that information is public. Go to: www.familytaxpayers.org/salary.php. To provide a true comparison, the salaries listed should be increased by 20% to reflect that teachers work only 10 months a year. You will note that there is absolutely no correlation between teacher pay and competence. Some of the best teachers get paid the least and vice versa. Second, what are teachers' pensions? For most teachers, this is based on a calculation that takes their highest 4 years of earnings (note that at least one of these will be inflated by accumulated sick days or other items), multiplied by 2.2% and then again by years of service. For example, a teacher who makes approximately $150,000 per year in their last four years, and who has 30 years of service, will have a lifetime pension of approximately $100,000 per year (yes, that's for life.) Yes, they don't get social security, but they don't pay into it either.
So, here's the real question: how can the teacher's union justify getting paid what they do--let alone more--given the following comparison to those who pay their salaries (us taxpayers):
--Raises of less than 3% per year, if any raise at all
--No lifetime job security
--Having to pay 20-30%+ of health insurance costs
--No pensions, let alone one that's 2/3 of our salaries
--Pay based on delivering results, not just time in grade

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stevie Janowski

10:48 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Lifetime job security? Give me a break. A teacher had a sex change, when she/he whatever you think came back to school like nothing happened. There are some terrible teachers at the school, that start late, end early and do not care abou the kids. Why are they not fired? This is a far left proposal in a far right town.

Comment_arrow

Think harder

11:29 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Because my kids are worth it. period.

Jeff

10:28 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@concerned citizen
This analysis reflects your misunderstanding of e reality of teaching
Compare how much other professions make with masters degrees?
Teachers put in 12 months of work in 10....long hours
And...why do you not want to attract the best of the best in the profession that takes care of my most important possession
Why do you want to short change my kids education?

Reply
Comment_arrow

RationalTht

7:01 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Jeff - sorry, you are not believable - teachers WORK 12 months / year @ 10hrs / day? Do they NEVER take all the breaks during the year? As for the summer, they may work another job, but that is additional pay ON TOP OF THE TEACHERS CADILLAC SALARY.

As for the rest of your comments, it just shows a thug-like mentality.

Me

10:44 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

@Jeff - You make it sound as though we are asking teachers to bunk together in a single-wide mobile home. We are talking about giving them raises in excess of 3% annually on top of their already generous salaries. We are asking them to pay only a portion of their pension costs and we are asking them to accept insurance plans that are in line with the plans that we the taxpayers who fund the schools receive in our jobs. We also are saying that it is ridiculous that you can reach the top of your pay scale in 20 years and then move on to another state and start building another fat pension there.

Reply

Think harder

11:09 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Thank you, Linda, whoever you are! Please do use this site as a teaching tool.. Many of these posters forget some taxpayer paid their way for their education and forget that teachers are our partners in not only educating but intervening when our youth are on the wrong path . These people lack respect for others. Look at what an uncivil ugly hate-filled world our kids will enter and none clearly worse than the financially privileged who complain when they may have to pay more. Using their logic maybe if they can't afford to live here they should just leave. I think we'd be better off as a community. Attacking teachers! Next it will be to attack police and firemen who protect our little bubble-land.

I sincere hope the people with OCD posting here all day don't represent the majority of LF residents and get back on their meds. Perhaps they will find happiness or go elsewhere and find it.. My goodness-I wonder if any of you miserable hate filled people go to my LF church?!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Love2read

1:13 am on Friday, September 14, 2012

@Think harder - Your quote, "Many of these posters forget some taxpayer paid their way for their education..." might have been accurate if the cost of education hadn't outpaced inflation, salaries and medical services.

Between1985 and 2011, the CPI-U (overall inflation) has increased approximately 114%, while the cost of college tuition has increased almost 500% (498.49% to be exact).

The educational debt burden on today's parents far exceed those of their own parents. My wife and I had this exact conversation when speaking about sending our two children to college. She mentioned that her parents paid both her and her sister's college education in full. I then countered that the equivalent to today's college costs would have been for her parents to send 6 children to college paying all of it in full.

I do agree with you about leaving out hate-filled, uncivil or ugly speech. Just the facts should be enough to show how ungrateful these teachers are for the wonderful incomes, vacation and pensions they will receive.

Wowwww

11:38 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Well I would like to say some of you people are sooooo disgusting saying fire the teachers you've already gone through the education system so the difference between new unexperienced teachers and teachers that know the curriculum and students doesn't matter to you stop being so god damn uptight do what's best for your kids these teachers know your kids and understand how to teach them Properly compared to the teachers we would get if something doesn't get ressolved also the parents that think there kids don't want these days of are crazy some of u people need to step out of this bubble and stop being such stuck up bitches

Reply
Comment_arrow

BJ Tyler

1:02 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Is this a product of the LF education system? I want my tax money back.

Stevie Janowski

11:41 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Strike is on, teachers be prepared to lose your asses

Reply

Wowwww

11:45 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I have a feeling most of these comments come from the moms that have the privilege to stay at home all day and not work while there husbands make a shit ton of money get over yourselves people

Reply
Comment_arrow

BJ Tyler

12:52 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Didn't know Juan Williams was posting on the Patch!

Comment_arrow

renae

2:26 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Hey Moron, I'm a working Mom...& unlike you & your ilk, I don't see myself as a victim or a "pre-existing condition". I have several friends who are teachers & are disgusted by the tactics of this sob story strike. It's all about protecting the lazy slobs vs. the teachers who entered this profession because they actually love to teach & don't complain, whine about anything. It's almost as there are two classes of teachers in the public education system, the givers & the takers. Sound familiar??

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

6:59 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

@Wowwww - well, your 'feeling' is probably wrong. My wife stays home, but we make other sacrifices to live here. Teacher's salaries look pretty good with all their benefits - how many people DON'T pay for healthcare? Also, getting a raise just for showing up...

People like you should get over yourselves.

LadyLiberty

11:48 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

I recently decided to visit a psychiatrist because I could not stop my uncontrollable urge to read the comments on the Patch forums. I wanted to understand my irrational need to subject myself to such things.

Well, after several sessions and some hypnosis, I uncovered a repressed memory that explained it all. It turns out that when I was a kid, I liked to go to the zoo. That's normal of course, but I was different. My favorite thing at the zoo was when the monkeys threw their feces through the bars. Once, the monkey feces hit me right in the face, and for some unknown reason, I really liked the feeling of that monkey feces flying at me.

So now I understand why I read the Patch.

Reply

Wowwww

11:55 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Haha omg u want to fight a kid!! Ur cool

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stevie Janowski

11:56 pm on Tuesday, September 11, 2012

how would i know your a kid? Grow up

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

7:00 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

@Steve - you might figure it out by his stupid comments.

Wowwww

12:22 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

U said I was a left wing high school student......

Reply

LF Res.

1:11 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

The problem is everyone wants their child to get the best education but they don't want to pay for it. Someone said "fire all the teacher" that's a great resolution. Then you can hire teachers from Zion or Waukegan and see where that takes the kids. Parents who don't support teachers should be ashamed of themselves. This is truly disgusting.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Life is Good

6:40 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

LF Res.: You are truly disgusting! To make such an ignorant comment "Then you can hire teachers from Zion or Waukegan and see where that takes the kids." is so shallow. You are a snob at best. What makes you so superior? Do you know any teachers from Zion or Waukegan? I assure you their challenges are far greater than the ones at LFHS. And no , I don't live in Waukegan or Zion but in Lake Bluff. And thankfully I have chosen to send my child to a private school.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

6:50 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

We support the teachers, we just can no longer afford to support their extortive demands.

Comment_arrow

Concerned Citizen

6:56 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

The argument that we should concede to whatever demands teachers have because "our students deserve the best" is flawed. The facts supporting this position are non-existent. First, while some of the teachers are exceptional and may very well be the best, many of them are not. Contrary to this opinion, there are teachers in other districts (including those listed) that are just as good if not better. Second, if the teachers and the students truly believe that LFHS teachers are the best, then why do they support tenure? If our students deserve the best, then they should get the best teachers and not be constrained by a time-in-grade, tenure system, which rewards years of service, not competence. Third, if the standard is we should pay for the best, then presumably, we would all look at the ranked list of teacher's salaries and all be in general agreement that the ranked list also reflects the quality of the teachers at LFHS. It's because it doesn't that there's an issue. While part of this is the fault of the unionized tenure system, it's also ours: once this is over, parents and teachers need to take on the quality issue publicly and visibly--recognizing and rewarding our best teachers and insisting that those that are not the best are neither rewarded nor retained. Finally, parents have paid for the "best education" (proof: per student expenditures at LFHS are among the highest in IL) and supported the last referendum. Now that we've paid for the best, we expect it.

P. Jocelyn

7:03 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Does anyone realize that no one on the LFHS Board of Education has a child at the high school?

Reply
Comment_arrow

P. Jocelyn

7:07 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

It is ridiculous that the Board has no problem with the ex-superintendant's disgusting compensation package, yet won't even negotiate with teachers. Folks - these two parties are going to have to meet some place in the middle. Compromise is going to have to happen.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

5:10 pm on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

No, they don't have to meet somewhere in the middle if the teachers demands are outrageous. Maybe if the BOE came in asking that all teachers take a 10% cut in pay and pay for 1/2 of their insurance; then they could meet in the middle.

P. Jocelyn

7:27 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Reading all these comments full of bitter emotion explains the state of the world.

Reply

P. Jocelyn

7:39 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

It's so funny...the school web site says that the teacher union continues to demand pay increases of more than double the consumer price index...Does anyone know what the current consumer price index is, or what it has been over the last year? Well, it is currently at 0. Yes, zero. Check the Bureau of Labor Statistics (www.bls.gov/news) It was zero in June and July of 2012, and actually -0.3 for May. Spin, spin, spin...

Reply

Me

7:44 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

@P. Jocelyn - So, if the BLS CPI number for last year was zero, then any increase based upon inflation is unwarranted. The teachers actually are looking for significant pay increases over and above the cost of living just for achieving that lofty goal of maintaining a pulse. Well done.

Reply

P. Jocelyn

7:51 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

And by the way, the cost of living index is not the consumer price index. The high school web site is stating that the teachers are seeking pay increases of more than double the CONSUMER PRICE INDEX, which is ZERO!!! You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time...

Reply

Gary

9:13 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

The teachers claim to have had a salary freeze last year. http://www.familytaxpayers.org/salary.php

Rnk Name 2011 Incr Salary 2010 Incr Salary 2009 Salary
1 Filippo___ 3.14% 168740 8.94% 163605 150178
2 Richards_ 6.00% 153016 6.00% 144355 136184
3 Benson__ 6.00% 151701 4.92% 143115 136405
4 Clark____ 6.00% 151530 6.00% 142953 134861
5 Gress___ 6.00% 149852 6.00% 141370 133367
6 Papp____ 6.00% 146724 6.00% 138419 130584
7 Brandes_ 4.94% 142452 5.85% 135751 128247
8 Gibson__ 6.00% 142201 6.00% 134152 126559
9 Straus___ 6.00% 140166 5.96% 132232 124792
10 Spagnoli 5.37% 137607 2.14% 130589 127856
11 Kuhl____ 3.41% 136593 1.82% 132084 129720
12 Gantt___ 4.10% 135403 2.92% 130072 126381
13 Kopriva_ 3.84% 134449 2.07% 129472 126846
14 Cooney_ 7.41% 134325 3.19% 125064 121203
15 Jerch___ 6.00% 134242 6.00% 126643 119474
16 Clegg___ 6.47% 133945 7.01% 125803 117566
17 Mueller__ 6.00% 132581 3.88% 125077 120406
18 Antrim_ -10.28% 132483 1.30% 147660 145768
19 Naughton 7.23% 132076 -4.59% 123166 129098
20 Littel____ 8.65% 131418 12.04% 120959 107956
21 Johnson_ 6.00% 131344 1.48% 123909 122098
22 Heroux__ 6.00% 130695 5.09% 123297 117324
23 Coad___ 3.71% 130594 2.45% 125922 122908
24 Haskett_ -0.48% 130099 6.85% 130732 122346
25 Nawor__ 5.76% 129965 6.15% 122888 115770

Reply
Comment_arrow

Me

10:31 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

@Gary - please stop confusing the issue with facts. We all know that the perception of reality in Teacherland cannot be defined by any known mathematical concepts.

Gary

9:45 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

The teachers and their union aren't satisfied with those salaries and those pay increases, and have taken their $40 million dollar ball and gone home. They have shown everyone what their priorities are, and now we need to show our children what our priorities are.

It's time to focus on rebuilding the school and getting our kids back in the classroom and on the playing field as fast as possible so that they can have the high school experience they deserve.

There are a lot of online educational tools, so I thought I'd bring some of them to your attention:

www.k12.com - clearing house for online schools
www.k12.com/cvcs - Chicago virtual charter school

www.kahnacademy.com - Quirky, but can be very effective

www.youtube.com - There are a large number of courses of every variety, and quality on youtube. I have done lots of professional training uses courses available on youtube.

There are many others that can be added to this list.

A quick core curriculum can be created from these resources, the kids can be brought into school and set up on computers, and school can be considered "in session" so extra-curricular activity can move on while the teaching staff is rebuilt.

Reply

Gary

1:14 pm on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

The school is recruiting helpers: www.lfhs.org

"Important Information - Strike is Announced and begins effective Wednesday, September 12, 2012

LFHS Seeks Help for Support Roles

If you would like to serve in a support role at Lake Forest High School during the teachers’ strike, please contact Gail Moesta at 847-582-7388 for more information or to set up a time to complete the application process."

The teachers walked the walk, and now that they have walked, it's our turn.

Reply
Comment_arrow

parent trap

4:18 pm on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

What does that mean "helpers"? This is all so wrong.

parent trap

4:17 pm on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Oh that's just great. That's the back-up plan? What happened to all the out of work teachers that would love to teach at LFHS?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathie

4:50 pm on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

@parent trap. Don't mock this. LF/LB is a community of parents, grandparents, neighbors and others who generously VOLUNTEER countless hours of time to support our kids and schools whenever they need help. We've been there before, and we'll be there now. Along with the churches and other organizations that have reached out to our kids as well.

Leave a comment