patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch.
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Wisconsin Investigates Lake County Clerk

Racine County district attorney looks into activities of Willard Helander during Wisconsin recall election. State Sen. Garrett recalls earlier incidents with clerk.

 

A complaint filed against Lake County Clerk Willard Helander with the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board arising from her activity during the June 5 recall election was not the first time she has been embroiled in election day controversy.

State Sen. Susan Garrett, D-Lake Forest, recalls disagreements with Helander early in the veteran legislator’s career, including events that led to legislation introduced by Garrett in the Illinois General Assembly.

In the recent Wisconsin incident, an election crime complaint was filed against Helander last week under Chapter 12 of Wisconsin law, according to Reid Magney, the spokesperson for the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board.

“When a complaint is filed under Chapter 12, I cannot comment or release a copy of the complaint,” Magney said. The Racine County district attorney will investigate the allegations and determine whether or not to bring charges, according to Magney.

A story in the Chicago Tribune indicated a Racine woman, Nicala Aiello, wore a button with the words “Recall Walker” into her polling place when Helander “started berating” her for displaying an electioneering message. Helander had a different recollection.

Aiello Becomes Belligerent

“She became belligerent,” Helander said of the encounter with Aiello. Helander knew wearing buttons into a polling place was a violation of Illinois law. “I was told it is against the law but it is not enforced,” Helander added of the Wisconsin legislation. She described what she learned from an election judge that day in Racine.

Helander went to Racine to observe same-day registration in Wisconsin since she thinks it could come to Illinois. She wanted to see how it worked and whether problems could occur.

“I read a Milwaukee police report that was very disturbing,” Helander said of Wisconsin same-day registration practices. Since similar legislation has been proposed in Illinois, Helander wanted to be prepared.

In 2002, when Garrett first was elected to the state Senate after serving two terms in the House, she recalled how she had to intercede with Helander so that her daughter, Elizabeth Garrett, could vote by absentee ballot. Elizabeth Garrett was in college at the time. Her vote did not count.

“My own daughter had a problem because she signed her name, on the absentee ballot application, E. Garrett instead of Elizabeth Garrett when it was obvious who she was. We had to introduce legislation to keep it from happening again.”

Garrett’s Law Solved Problem

Helander explained that kind of mix-up could not happen today. “Those determinations were made by both party’s election judges in the precinct,” she said. “Now we have trained people in headquarters.”

Garrett introduced the bill to change the law shortly after she became a state senator in 2003 and it passed later that year.

Both Garrett and Helander have different recollections of an incident at Neal School in North Chicago in November 2000, when Garrett was running for her second term as a state representative.

Garrett recollects a disagreement with Helander over allowing people to vote after polls closed at 7 p.m. when they were in line before closing time. Garrett recalls the lines were long because of a lack of equipment in the polling place.

Memories Vary for Helander, Garrett

Helander recollects a confrontation with Garrett that day but denies there was any shortage of equipment.

“I am deeply offended by Sen. Garrett’s accusation,” Helander said. “We assign equipment on a mathematic formula designed by our technical staff. When you bus people to a polling place there are going to be lines.”

Garrett disagreed with Helander’s recollection. “I don’t remember a bus,” Garrett said. “These are working people who live in the precinct. When working people don’t vote early, they vote between 5 and 7. There was no busing.”

What Helander remembers about that election day is a disagreement with Garrett over whether a particular voter had proper identification. “You don’t forget being body blasted by a 300-pound woman,” Helander said of her contact with the particular voter Garrett was defending. Garrett does not remember the incident.

Related Topics: Lake County Clerk, Susan Garrett, Wisconsin Recall Elections, and willard helander

Adam Beeson

7:11 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Why was this story published? The only fact is based on a complaint filed against Helander in Wisconsin over electioneering. The rest is unrelated heresay. The entire story appears to be a partisan hit piece. I expect more from Patch.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Sullivan

7:43 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Agree with comment. Very poor journalism.

Comment_arrow

Rick

8:11 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Also agreed that this is a partisan smear. Helander has a very good reputation among poll watchers for being a stickler to the rules. Patch is unfortunately showing colors to the detriment of the community at large.

Comment_arrow

Nancie Blatt

10:33 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

NB if any one has followed Helander's history she has lied her way through every inappropriate thing she has done to keep valid voters from voting. Her actions in Wisconsin were truly wrong. She is a serial liar

Comment_arrow

GuitarMan

12:43 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Wait let me get this right, Mr. Beeson according to your LinkedIn profile you have served as Chief of Staff for Ill. Rep. Ed Sulivan (R), and now you come to the rescue of Ms. Helander who is a long time Republic fixture here in Lake County Illinois. I would like to defend the article and flush out how loosely partisan political operative accuse others as being “partisan”

We can presume that Helanders’ involvement in the Wisconsin matter is purely "educational", or as a means to gather insight on furthering the labyrinth of current voter registration challenges embraced by the Republican Party. The additional matters presented in the article are an attempt to show Helanders' attention to registration formalities, while ignoring common sense interpretation of administrative records recognized by the legislative body you give assistance to. Is it proper to claim the Patch is journalistically “partisan”, but you are not?

Jen

8:22 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

I want the last 5 minutes of my life back.

Reply

patrick o'hayer

8:46 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

GOP suppressing Dem turnout? Impossible! (heh heh)

Reply

Richard Heineman

9:24 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Click on the related Tribune article. The reporting follows their lead.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adam Beeson

9:43 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

...and I've now read the Tribune's article and that still doesn't explain the inclusion of Susan Garrett's partisan attacks. They took a very weak story and turned it into a political attack piece. If Patch wants to make it, they are going to have to keep political bias out of their stories. This one's ridiculous.

Sharon Narrod

9:37 am on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Having opposed Willard Helander Helander for the office of County Clerk in 2006, I can tell you that this incident does not surprise me at all. For those who felt this article was partisan, please let me remind all of you that the Clerk counts the vote. Healnder has always run the Clerk's office right up to the edge of partisanship. We all need to pay attention to any indication of partisanship on behalf of the Clerk. During my race, I found instances of questionable behavior (the most notable was the incident of denying the acceptance of ballots by college students). It would be improper to comment on the current complaint until the investigatin is complete, but I would support continued vigilence of the operations of the Clerk's office, no matter who holds the office. In a country where roughly only 50% of the population is registered, we need to safeguard one of the hallmarks of a free society. We have only to look at the legislation being passed in states like Florida to understand that voter suppression (not voter fraud), is alive and well. My guess is that Willard Helander is a Republican first and her traveling to Wisconsin was in support of her party, not her desire to observe same day registration. Finally, I would encourage everyone to vote! And, if you are not registered, get registered and encourage those you know to do the same.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Louis G. Atsaves

12:02 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

"Right up to the edge of partisanship." So that means she never crossed the line into partisanship. But Democrats love to complain when Helander enforces election laws. They call that "questionable behavior." They ignore the fact that she is doing her job. She took her oath of office to UPHOLD the Constitution of the United States AND its laws. It sounds like that oath and that awesome responsibility annoys our local Democrats, Narrod and Garrett. Which oath would have Ms. Narrod taken if she was successful in her quest to be elected to that office? To uphold the Constitution and the laws of the United States only when she agrees with them?

I also agree the inclusion of Senator Garrett's partisan attacks are entirely improper. I am willing to hazard a bet that in Democratic controlled Racine, if an individual entered a polling place with a "I stand with Governor Walker" button, she would have been immediately arrested.

Instead, a the electioneering lady files a complaint against the whistleblower? I expect that nonsensical complaint to be dismissed in the very near future as being as baseless as it sounds.

If you want fair and clean elections, including election day registration, based on my long history as a 30 year poll watcher, it can be solved with one simple change: PHOTO ID!

Randy1949

2:07 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

"Helander went to Racine to observe same-day registration in Wisconsin since she thinks it could come to Illinois. She wanted to see how it worked and whether problems could occur."

Really? Perhaps Ms. Helander would like to explain why she chose that particular polling place in Racine, when surely there were closer precincts where same-day registration would be taking place.

Reply

James Kudrna

8:46 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Grow up and let's deal with the real societal issues we have. Your collective behavior is similar to that of all of our state and federal politicians-strictly partisan and not in the best interest of those who elected you. When will you all get off the dime and do something positive rather than peck at each other like a bunch of hens. Sick and tired of this behavior. Time to clean house again!

Reply

Janet Sirabian

11:00 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

The "clerk" does not "count" the votes. The "electronic" precinct ballot counter "counts" the votes.

And wearing a campaign button of any sort inside the polling place is prohibited.

And it is time for BOTH sides to stop accusing the other of questionable electioneering behavior and work together to educate people on government and get people out to VOTE!

Reply
Comment_arrow

frank

11:34 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

I totally agree. i've worked as an election judge in Lake County for over 9 years and I have never found Willard to be anything but professional and non-partisan. It does not suprise me that she spoke up electioneering buttons. She knows the rules and she makes sure all her officials do too..

Shelly Jaffe

3:05 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Is anyone investigating Mrs. Garrett for her intimidation tactics and threats against other elected officials and Political Action Committees? I didn't think so.

Reply

Jesus

6:15 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Come on it's not partisan to say the republicans and their crony capitalism have completely ruined lake county for anyone but themselves. They pay their top crook $300K while the rest of us get creamed in property taxes. It's partisan to continue pretending nothing is going on here while report after report tells us of malfesance, misbehavior and nepotism bleeding us dry.
Come on this "lady" is as crooked as they come, but by all means she is not alone in this county.

Reply

marco sangria

11:18 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

its politics as usual and Susan garrett is a master at it. remember she calls her self an independent but listens to everything Mike Madigan tells her. Oh there was something that she didnt vote on with Mike but then again shes not running for office anymore. A wise decison for both she and Karen May.

Reply

Leave a comment