.

It Was All A Dream

Instead of a dream, reality tells us that the attempt to blame the Bengazhi terrorist attack on a video was a coverup, a lie, and a hoax

 

Those old enough might remember the episode of "Dallas" in 1986, in which Bobby Ewing was seen in the shower.  Two years earlier, in the season finale, the character, played by Patrick Duffy, was killed by the sister of his ex-wife, run over by a car.  For two years and umpteen episodes, Bobby Ewing was dead and gone from the show. Then the season opened with plausible deniability, saying it was all a dream.

As with the last three weeks of the Libyan embassy saga are we to conclude that it was all a dream, that it never happened?  The State Department assures us that it NEVER thought the embassy was subjected to a protest over the 14 second video.  Furthermore, that it was an organized terrorist attack from the start.

We are led to believe that the nine days in which Susan Rice, US Ambassador to the UN, said repeatedly that the Libyan embassy was subjected to a protest over an obscure "movie" gone bad, not organized terrorist attacks NEVER HAPPENED. 

Are we likewise to conclude that the video with Hillary and Barack, produced for Pakistani television, apologizing for that obscure video, NEVER HAPPENED.  Ignore the man behind the green curtain!   

Sorry, Mr. President, but Dallas was a work of fiction where anything goes. The Ministry of Truth, from Orwell's 1984, can't rewrite this history. It happened, and this is why it happened.   http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/1984/

The early disclaimers, issued by Susan Rice, were intended to be consistent with President Obama's narrative (the kind repeated enough until it becomes truth), that Bin Laden is dead, Al Qaeda is dead, and that the Muslim Brotherhood loves us. The State Department issued no clarification for 16 hours, half an hour after Governor Romney called them out, and then merely repeated Ms. Rice's allegations. President Obama waited until his appearance with ladies of  "The View" was over until speaking out, not against the terrorist, but against Governor Romney for speaking out of turn. 

Then the videos appeared, showing the Consulate in Benghazi under attack by militants with machine guns, RPGs and mortars, and not a protester in sight. This was confirmed by the State Department, and the Libyan Government, but the misrepresentations by Ms. Rice and the White House continued. We ask why? What was the reason behind this narrative? Did it serve the interests of the United States? No! It served the interests of the President's campaign.

The network news media, ABC, NBC, and CBS, devoted less than 15 minutes to the Libyan events, all three put together. Nor did they address the state of the economy, or any other issues of vital public interest.  It was business as usual, everything you need to know and less. To millions of their viewers, it NEVER HAPPENED.

Fox news was different. The Libyan affair was the lead story at Fox News for nearly three weeks, along with the apparent coverup,  to the nearly total exclusion of news about unemployment and the economy. Thus the most potent critic of the Obama administration was effectively silenced during a significant portion of the time remaining before the election.

If the misstatements by the Obama Administration did constitute a crisis, it was not one his campaign committee were prepared to waste.  What better way to control Fox News than to taunt them with repeated misstatements.  As Rahm Emanual remarked back in 2008 in Wall Street Journal interview when Chief of Staff to President Obama, "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. But what I mean by that it is an opportunity to do things that you could not do before." 

Will the Obama administration's dream-like, non-portrayal of what was terrorism in Lybia soon be penetrated by the mainstream media to reflect reality, or will the media continue to deny the broader implications of the still smoldering situation to protect the President's "tough on terrorism" image? 

For it was not the video that incited the terrorism at Bengazhi which killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, but the failure of Obama's politics in the Middle East.  The light security at Bengazh, despite requests from the murdered  Ambassador himself, was due to the pie-in-the-sky dream policies of those in the Obama administration who believe that blending in with the people would dispel any notion of imperialism.

To deny that Bengazhi was and is still a no-man's land, not unlike the Dodge City of another era, displays a certain amount of arrogance and a disassociation with reality on the part of President Obama who, after all, keeps reminding the American people that "we killed Ben Laden!" Are we supposed to believe that Al Qaeda officially ceased to exist when their ex facto leader was eliminated? Are we supposed to forget that weeks of denial that continued, even after the truth of the attack became public knowledge?

Instead of a dream, reality tells us that the attempt to blame the Bengazhi terrorist attack on a video was a coverup, a lie, and a hoax. 

 

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Eric Grenier October 17, 2012 at 04:41 PM
NYT & Reuters still report that on-scene Libyan witnesses say the attacks WERE at least in part inspired by the video and that a more loosely planned assault may have taken advantage of public outrage drummed up by local Muslim clerics. It seems like a premature and largely politically-inspired effort by Romney to attack the president when the situation is still evolving. It’s much more likely that the Middle East insurgency is due much less to "weak policies" and more to changes unleashed by the emergence of democracy - where there are far fewer controls on dissent and potential paramilitary activity. Can the emergence of democracy in lieu of tyrants be called a failure simply because of increased incidents of insurrection? How are such newly unleashed forces to be "controlled" when the purpose of democracy is to reduce such controls? Is the fact that thousands of Libyans took to the streets to condemn the attack to be ignored as well? The writer states that the administration released "a video with Hillary and Barack…apologizing for that obscure video". Perhaps she linked to a blog site with the wrong video because the video attached was no "apology". Finally, why would the administration and State Dept. cover up what everyone knows is very risky diplomatic work of integrating into a new but fragile democracy? History has not been kind to cover-ups, why would they risk that for this? A lot of under-supported conclusions during a tight presidential race.
guee November 30, 2012 at 09:04 AM
called in his book a “healthy debate” http://www.coachfactoryoutletcc.us /Coach Outlet Onlineover troop levels in the country.But the president’s decision to tap Mr. Petraeus to command the war in Afghanistan, http://www.guccibeltsoutletstores.net /Gucci Beltsand later picking him to lead the C.I.A., effectively ended lingering concerns among Obama political advisers that the http://www.coachoutletonlinewo.com /Coach Outlet Storepopular general might challenge his commander in chief during the election.Mr. Petraeus and his wife met http://www.coachfactorystoredo.com /Coach Factory Onlinewhen he was a cadet at West Point; she was the daughter of the academy’s superintendent and a student at Dickinson http://www.coachfactoryoutletpo.com /Coach Factory Outlet OnlineCollegeinPennsylvania.condemnation on Wednesday.“ The Egyptian people, the Egyptian leadership, http://www.coachoutletonlinefc.org /Coach Outlet Onlinethe Egyptian government and all of Egypt is standing with all its

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something