.

Part 2: Questionable Common Core State Standards Initiatives given 'green light' in LF Districts 67 and 115

Might you find Common Core as a replacement curriculum in Lake Forest School Districts 115 and 67 as questionable as I do?


  
In Part one posted on Thursday, August 30 -- The IEA continues to hold hostage with a heavy hammer -- addressed was the influence of the Illinois Eduction Association (IEA) in regard to contract negotiations which have broken down between the District 115 board and high school teachers.

 

It is only fitting that residents and taxpayers of Lake Forest and Lake Bluff would be focused at the moment on the union imposed strike called for on September 12th  by Lake Forest High School teachers.

 

What has certainly slipped under the radar is an awareness that Lake Forest School Districts 115 and 67 have signed on to what is known as the Common Core State Standards Initiatives, with its promises to "provide a consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn, so teachers and parents know what they need to do to help them."  www.corestandards.org

 

My first encounter with the Common Core program was when I attended a District 67 school board meeting on May 22 of this year, although The Common Core State Standards Initiatives date back to 2009 with an announcement by the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers that they would be developing Common Core standards and assessments.

 

At the May 22 board meeting, a report by the Education Committee indicated that NWEA had made initial changes to their tests this year in order to begin preparing schools for the new tests that would measure national Common Core practices in 2014.   http://www.lf67.org/schoolboard/minutes11_12/MinRegMtg52212.pdf 

 

At the time there was curiosity about the nature of Common Core, but I neglected to find out more about what it was and what its application would mean applied to Lake Forest School Districts 115 and 67. 

 

Recently I contacted two individuals who are extremely knowledgeable about school issues throughout the state of Illinois and asked for their input on Common Core:    Chris Jenner and Lennie Jarrett. 

 

Chris Jenner is an Education policy watchdog, two term Cary D-26 board member, board secretary, and policy committee chair, while Lennie Jarrett is an Education Watchdog and founder of  For Our Childrens Future .  Both are well qualified to speak on public school issues and do so frequently.

 

I was told to check http://www.corestandards.org only to discover that Common Standards is a federal education program that has presently been adopted by 45 states and three U.S. territories.  

 

A map appeared on my screen telling me that Illinois had signed on to the federal Common Core State Standards Initiatives on June 24, 2010.  States so far not signing up to adopt CCSS are Alaska, Minnesota, Nebraska, Texas, and Virginia.    www.corestandards.org/in-the-states  

 

In response to several question asked of my contacts, I was informed how CCSS (Common Core State Standards) is being pushed by the Obama administration and by others who favor the nationalization of curriculum. 

 

Not surprising is that Common Core is enthusiastically supported and aided by teacher unions, including the IEA.

 

One of my questions to Chris Jenner and Lennie Jarrett dealt specifically with Lake Forest Districts 115 and 67:   "Why would Lake Forest School Districts be so eager to sign on to CCSS?" 

 

Comments shared by Jenner and Jarrett are noted below:

 

"It is being pushed with money incentives, but that money is already drying up, leaving districts with high costs to buy the new curriculum."

 

"Many Illinois districts are headed in that direction, having already signed or who will be switching to Common Core, in what could be described as "herd mentality."   In my own D-26, the administration is acting as if it's a foregone conclusion.  There weren't any board discussions about whether we should go in that direction."

 

"One thing to watch for it the costs associated with implementing  CCSS.  We're being told it will cost $500,000 for new English books alone for his rather small district." 

 

As a member of The Heritage Foundation, I searched its website for further insight.  Heritage has for over 30 years been confronting challenges facing this nation  (www.heritage.org)

 

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institute think tank.  As such it communicates with Members of Congress, key congressional staff members, policymakers in the executive branch, the news media, and the academic and public policy communities through sharing its extensive research as a respected and well-known national organization.

 

The Heritage Foundation published the following article on April 16 of this year, "States Must Reject National Education Standards While There Is Still Time."  http://www.heritage.org/research/resports/2012/04/states-must-reject-national-education-standards-while-there-is-still-time  

 

Written by Lindsey M. Burke, the Will Skillman Fellow in Education in the Domestic Policy Studies Department at The Heritage Foundation, the article is a must read for concerned citizens and definitely a must read for Superintendent Michael Simeck, board members who head education committees, and teachers within Districts 115 and 67 who deal with curriculum development..

 

The following excerpt from Lindsey Burke's article is especially telling:

 

"The push to nationalize the content of what is taught in every local public school across American is riddled with problems. First and foremost, the constitutional authority for education rests with states and localities, not the federal government.  National standards and tests are unlikely to increase academic achievement, will not fix the fundamental misalignment of power and incentives that defines education today, will lead to the standardization of mediocrity, will create significant new expenses for states, and will significantly grow the federal in education."


To learn what is in store for schools in Illinois who have signed on to Common Core, be sure to read:  "The New Illinois Learning Standards Incorporating the Common Core."   www.isbe.net/common_core/default.htm 

The target date for the implementation of the Common Core assessment program throughout the state of Illinois is set for the 2014-2015 school year.

Might you find Common Core as a replacement curriculum in Lake Forest School Districts 115 and 67 as questionable as I do? 

 

There is still time to register your complaint against implementing a federal education program that should have no place in the Lake Forest School System.

 

Attend scheduled school board meetings to let your opinion be heard.

 

The federal government is not  known for its ability to succeed in much of anything it takes charge of.  Education is too important to allow standards to be dictated at the federal level in Lake Forest Districts 67 and 115.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

LadyLiberty September 02, 2012 at 03:50 AM
Once there was a spider crawling across my keyboard. In a fit of terror, I started pounding on my keyboard with a stale baguette in an attempt to kill the spider. The random letters that appeared on my screen from my bread beating contained more of a meaningful point than this blog post.
Roger Billings September 02, 2012 at 01:37 PM
LadyLiberty, I also could not find a crumb of sense in Crazy Nancy's latest rant. From what I can tell, she is not against common core standards because they are bad education, but because other people like them. Hmmm. Time for a new lining in that tinfoil hat.
Elizabeth Rich September 03, 2012 at 12:12 AM
The two postings above have me laughing right off my chair! Nancy is at it again...that should indicate to the LF community that CCSS are probably a good thing for education. True to her form, her info. is riddled with inaccuracies....CCSS are mandated by 2014...districts can't "opt out" at this pt., no obligation to buy new textbooks (can just switch the order things are introduced), LF is on a 5 yr. textbook adoption cycle anyway...no extra money to switch to CCSS so there goes that conspiracy theory....etc.....
RationalTht September 03, 2012 at 03:21 AM
To all the folks going after the Nancy - the question remains. LF&LB schools have generally performed better than most in the state using the existing curriculum. We are now going to switch to a "common" curriculum so that we can all be "equal". Is the curriculum as challenging? One of the goals, according to the ISBE website, is "2.Build a pathway to college and career readiness for all students" - they are saying that ALL students are capable of college? The only way that happens is to lower the standards, which I guess is what they have been doing for years anyway. Honestly, you are attacking her, but using the same "logic". You have not stated what is "good" about the new standards - it sounds like you are supporting them JUST because they are coming from the federal government.
Roger Billings September 04, 2012 at 12:21 AM
Wow, RationalTht, you really should change your name to something else that doesn't have the word "rational" in it. You seem to have major language comprehension and logic problems. Who said the switch is so that we can all be equal? I don't know if the curriculum is as challenging or not. Perhaps an analysis of that topic would be in order instead of random rantings by the two of you. "...pathway to college and career readiness..." No, college is not suitable for all students, but a career should be. How did you conclude that reference to college and career readiness meant only college? I am not in any way advocating the new standards; I do not know enough about them. I merely observed that Thorner once again wrote a rant with no logical underpinnings. Then, you followed with something at least as bad. Please tell me what I wrote that would give a rational person any reason to believe that I support the standards "JUST because they are coming from the federal government." Really, words mean something and you shouldn't go about writing them if you don't understand them when more than a few are strung together next to each other.
Fooklam September 04, 2012 at 02:43 AM
Post of the year!!
Michael H. Ebner September 04, 2012 at 11:33 AM
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said it especially well: The value of a person's opinion is whether it sells in the marketplace of ideas.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something