Political shenanigans are not limited to one political party.
Integrity, however, in government and among those elected to serve is essential at all levels of government to allow the sunshine in. If not, corruption will take over and will eventually snag elected officials who had every intention of initially serving their constituents honestly.
It is not my intent as a lifelong Republican to point fingers at my fellow Republicans. However, I believe malicious actions are like a cancer that will only multiply and destroy the whole if left unchecked, and I cannot permit injustice when observed to remain under the radar of public scrutiny.
The narrative of the Illinois 58th House District race represents a current political election kerfuffle that every voter needs to be aware of to make an informed and educated decisions this fall and in future elections.
As such, it is fair to inquire why Dr. Mark Neerhof was not selected as the Republican candidate to succeed Lauren Turelli on the November ballot after Turelli dropped out of the race. .
My initial thought upon hearing was whether Dr. Neerhof had been approached to take Lauren's place? If Neerhof had been asked and expressed a desire to continue his bid for the 58th District House seat, why then were other candidates up for consideration by Lake County GOP Chairman Bob Cook to replace Turelli, including Shaw and Keith Gray?
Wanting to hear a factual account from the individual who had experienced rejection, I made an appointment to visit Dr. Mark Neerhof and his wife, Betty, last Saturday in their lovely Lake Forest home.
It would be impossible to relate every nuanced detail of my conversation with Neerhof. What I will attempt to show is that Turelli perpetuated alleged deception during her primary campaign, and how Shaw, as her campaign manager, formulated the same alleged deceptions via press releases.
Furthermore, the selection of Shaw to succeed Turelli was enabled through the actions of Ed Sullivan, 51st District representative, Tom Cross, Minority Republican Leader in Springfield, and Cook.
It was in August of last year that Neerhof first expressed his desire to run for the District 58th House seat to Sullivan.
Although Neerhof had never run for office before, loving his country and thankful for his success in life and the opportunities given him, he wanted to go to Springfield to make a difference.
Neerhof was willing to sacrifice his own career as a renowned D.O. specializing in material and fetal health in a practice limited to high risk obstetrics in the North Shore University Health System Medical Group to deal with much needed Medicaid reform and other pressing problems facing the state.
Sullivan was seated in the same spot as I in Neerhof's living room with wife Betty present in August. Neerhof asked Sullivan if Springfield would be supportive of his campaign effort if he became a candidate in District 58?
Without hesitation, Sullivan candidly informed Neerhof that the HRO (House Republican Organization) never became involved to lend a hand financially in primary elections and that he would be supportive of Neerhof's bid.
On Sept. 28, 2011, for another term. On the same day, Neerhof received two telephone calls from his campaign manager, Brad Goodman, first telling him that May had dropped out of the race and then informing Neerhof that .
I was surprised to learn that Gray, a Mettawa businessman, was a viable candidate along with Neerhof for the District 58 House seat. With the announcement of Turelli's bid to enter the race, Gray pulled out of the race Oct. 11, 2011, to give his full support to her.
With the exit of Gray, the contest was now between Neerhof and Turelli. From Jan. 1 to the March 3 primary, Neerhof was involved in an active campaign, knocking on doors every Saturday and Sunday with the exception of one weekend. During that same period, Neerhof was saddled with raising the funds necessary to compete with Turelli.
In a complete about face to what Sullivan told Neerhof in his face-to-face meeting last August, the HRO, through Republican Minority Leader Cross, dolled out $50,000 to the Turelli campaign during the primary season (see attached PDF documents).
It was during the last few weeks of the District 58 race that all the mud slinging ads and campaign mailings with their alleged false allegations against challenger Neerhof occurred, made possible through an additional pot of money made available to the Turelli campaign by Cross out of his HRO fund (see attached PDF documents).
she had obtained in International Relations from England's University of Cambridge in 1994, and the subsequent controversy, caught the attention of Cross in Springfield and raised questions over Turelli's ability to beat Neerhof.
Shaw allegedly countered by informing Neerhof that he had filed false ethics mistakes against him for receiving income from Medicaid patients.
Shaw later admitted that his complaint against Neerhof was never filed. As Neerhof told me, "As one who works for the North Shore University Health System Medical Group, I never receive separate checks from the government. I am an employee of Northshore."
Shaw's selection by Cook to represent the GOP against Democratic candidate Scott Drury deserves exploration.
According to Neerhof, the reasons he was given by Cook for Shaw's appointment on the same night it was decided are suggestive of heavy-handed political pressure applied on Cook from the Republican Establishment in Lake County and by Cross in Springfield.
1. According to Cook, Shaw had his campaign team in place and ready to go. Did Neerhof's campaign efforts and the time, dedication and money spent since entering the race in August of 2011 count for nothing?
2. According to Cook, Louis Atsaves had withdrawn his support for Neerhof and was now supporting Shaw. Not true, according to Neerhof after speaking by phone with Atsaves, precinct leader of Moraine Township, immediately after Cook made the Atsaves allegation.
3. Cook admitted to Neerhof that he had based his Atsaves allegation on a rumor, according to Neerhof.
4. According to Cook, Neerhof would have been selected had he been involved in more Republican type activities throughout the years.
It is true that Shaw can show am active record in many Republican and civic activities.
As Neerhof related to me, "If Mark Shaw believed he was such a great candidate, why didn't he initially run instead of Lauren Turelli?"
Neerhof's background is not flush with outside activities. They include mainly participation in church activities and his work as an executive board member of DocsPatientCare, a national organization committed to real medical reform. He also would have brought extensive medical knowledge and expertise to the floor of the House to reform this state's desperately needed and broken Medicaid system.
Now it is time to reveal the real reason why Neerhof was passed over. The financial help given the Turelli campaign, with not a drop going to support Neerhof's campaign, speaks volumes as to which candidate Cross wanted sent to Springfield to join him in the House.
The question remains what there was about Shaw's suitability that prompted the Republican Establishment in Lake County and in Springfield to embrace him?
Within the Republican Establishment is found the answer. Conservatives need not apply or only sparingly. They upset the apple cart with their clear thinking.
Having a mind of their own, conservatives will not allow their principles to be compromised, but are duty bound to do what their constituents elected them to do back home.
Neerhof is not ashamed of calling himself a conservative Republican. He is not an extremist in any way, but to Cross having "yes" establishment congressmen in the House is important to maintaining his power and control and his leadership role as Republican House Minority Leader.
Shaw represents the ideal Republican Establishment candidate. In contrast, Neerhof, as a Republican political outsider, doesn't measure up in the eyes of the Republican Establishment either at home or in Springfield.
With enough public outrage, both Bob Cook and Mark Shaw could be made to resign their respective positions and Neerhof given a chance to resume his campaign for the 58th House seat.
I opened my article by insisting that integrity was necessary at all levels of government. Is it any wonder why the American people have become disrespectful wary of politicians and their political institutions?
If you know just a little bit about local politics and you like to laugh, Nancy Thorner's writings are a must read. When Turelli announced she was getting out of the race, Thorner announced that she would resign her Precinct Committeeman position if anyone but Neerhof became the new candidate for State Representative. So Nancy, do you follow through on your promises, or are you going to prove to everyone that you're a hypocrite and a liar?
Ms. Thorner describes her admiration and support for Dr. Mark Neerhof and believes that because he finished in second place in the Republican primary to fill the open 58th District State Representative position, he should be the natural replacement for the winner – Turelli - who resigned for family reasons. I was a supporter of Neerhof in both the primary and in the meeting Republican Party Chairman Robert Cook called to help gauge the support each candidate (Neerhof, Shaw, and Gray) generated. As an individual and as the elected Committeeman for Bannockburn, Del Mar Woods, and a sliver of Highland Park, I wrote a letter stating my support for Dr. Neerhof in the Primary and hand delivered it to all my constituents during the period leading up to the election. I consider Mark to be a friend and a man of impeccable character. Continued In Part 2
But occasionally something happens which can force one to re-evaluate their position. And that is exactly what happened in the case of Neerhof Vs Shaw Vs Gray. Something happened in Springfield that highlighted how democracy has all but disappeared in Illinois government. And that destruction was brought about by the tyrannical Speaker of the House, Michael Madigan and his Democrat colleagues. Replacing Turelli with a political neophyte at this point in time is no longer an option. Before continuing with the “Thorner Controversy,” I believe a short primer on political parties is in order to help place it in perspective. A political party is a group of like minded people who seek to influence the political process. The political party is NOT open to all, but only to those who agree to work within the party structure and strive to advance its goals. Republican Party members include the Committeemen, Precinct Captains, and Block Captains who do the “grunt work” to make America an even better place to live and work. Their dedication helps motivate the public to support the Party by donating time and/or money, holding "meet and greets," writing letters to the editor, etc., etc…. And voting for their candidates in both the Primary and the General Election.Continued In Part 3
But just because a person takes a Party's ballot in a Primary Election, it does not automatically make them a member of the Party. You must join and be accepted to be a Party member. Otherwise there would be total chaos as each Party’s partisans would begin infiltrating the “enemy.” Having said that, let’s get back to the “Thorner Controversy!” A few short days ago, many of us became aware of events unfolding in Springfield that all but destroyed Neerhoh’s chances of becoming the Republican’s standard bearer in the race to fill the open seat in the 58th Representative District. Neerhof is a gentleman, an incredibly intelligent, God fearing person, and someone you would not want to see on the other end of your debate. But therein lies the problem: under House Speaker Madigan, Springfield has become a tyrannical empire responsible to Madigan and Madigan alone, and Dr. Neerhof would be toast. There is NO chance for any meaningful legislation to pass under Madigan’s dictatorial rule. Continued in Part 4
Chairman Cook realized how bad the situation had become and selected a member of the Republican Party who was a distinguished leader and organizer, a legal scholar, and a trench warrior to boot. That man, Mark Shaw, is charged with leading the fight to return Illinois government to citizen control through representation, not dictation. I believe that in the final analysis, Dr. Neerhof will be more than happy he wasn’t sucked into the mire called Springfield. Jack Koenig, Communications Chairman Lake County Republican Party
Shaw spoke of "a few short days ago" when events happened in Springfield that required a pit bull to fight the nasty fight that Democrats would wage. To which I might question, was Lauren Turelli, the candidate, a pit bull? Yet all the HRO (House Republican Organization) money was directed to Turelli's campaign by Tom Cross and none given to Dr. Mark Neerof, after Ed Sullivan informed Neerhof back in August of last year that he could depend on both money and support from Springfield if he ran as a candidate in the 58th.
Writing the account of the 58th House race was not a vindictive act by me. It was based on integrity. Sadly integrity seems to be in short change now days, especially in politics among its political leaders and legislators. People must care. Sadly enough, people are willing to go with the flow as enablers of those who profit by pulling the wool over our eyes. Hopefully enough Republicans will care and act.
At this point the Republican Party is the minority party and will continue to be so in Illinois, as keeping the status quo seems acceptable to Republican Establishment movers and shakers both locally and in Springfield. It is crazy to expect different result when those elected remain political "insiders." Additionally, why should Illinois voters select a Republican over a Democrat when Republican candidates themselves often differs little from their Democrats counterparts. When the difference is obvious, Republican candidates are often unable to articulate their differences in a meaningful way to the voting public. About tackling corruption, Jack, this would be deeply frowned upon by the Republican Establishment in all quarter. You wouldn't remain long in Springfield by challenging the status quo, as Tom Cross maintains his control and power as the Republican Minority Leader though the loyalty he demands from those Republican legislators who join him in the House floor.
Below are a few unanswered questions that call for clarification because of what they seem to infer. 1. Why wasn't Dr. Neerhof asked if he wished to continue his campaign when Turelli quit the race in June? His campaign team was in place and ready to go. 2. Why did Mark Shaw's name even come up for consideration, serving as he did as Lauren Turelli's campaign manager? If Shaw thought he was a worthy candidate for the 58th District, why didn't he enter the race intially instead of Turelli? 3. Why did Turelli's campaign receive more than $50,000 from the HRO (House Republican Organization) managed by Minority Republican Leader Tom Cross in Springfield, while Neerhof's campaign received none, after Neeroff was informed that the HRO never became involved during primary campaigns?
As far as corruption in Springfield is concerned, I'm still asking for specifics instead of your scatter gun claims. I'm sure, that with a bit of digging you can uncover something, because quite frankly the only time we walk on water is when it's raining.
Could it be that that Dr. Mark Neerhof was not considered part of the Lake County Republican Establishment and was frowned upon as an outsider. On the other hand, Mark Shaw, as an entrenched political insider and Establishment member, received unconditional support from the Establishment because he fit in and would protect the status quo in Springfield. What happened is not an isolated incident. It occurs in both poltical party and at all levels of goverment. Politicans are not about to end political maneuverings with their promise of bringing increased power and control, even though the process is turning off conservatives and independents alike. The Shaw/Neerhof decision should be faced head on for how it happened and what it represents, but does the public even care!
A conservative---Is that the same type of conservative as Chief Justice John Roberts?
and shakers. Being a moderate, few of our kind are allowed to enter the inner circle where most of the deals are cut, yet our votes are highly sought after at election time. Regarding corruption, it is in the mind of the beholder. Frankly it sounds rather naive to say that a bit of digging would be necessary to uncover corruption in Springfield. As Nancy Thorner is not involved in Springfield, how could she possibly keep tabs on the goings on in Springfield? in Chicago area newspaper in contrast to how through the presentation is in the southern part of Illinois. If you want to see corruption read the Illinois School Code. I don't think it would be wise to ask Nancy Thorner to point out corruption here in Lake County. Perhaps this is why you asked Nancy to zero in on corruption only down in Springfield? I have read articles written by Nancy Thorner, with documented sources exposing corrupt activities within the Lake County Republican Party among the Establishment. Be careful what you ask for, Jack!
If you wish to talk to me privately, Margie, I would suggest that you give me a call. I'm the only Thorner in the entire Chicagoland besides a stepson who lives in Oak Brook.