.
Feedback

Union Claims LFHS Board Will Not Meet

Board has yet to respond to the union’s latest proposal and will not schedule further mediation.

No negotiation sessions are currently scheduled between the Lake Forest Educators Association teachers’ union and the District 115 Board of Education as the Board has posted what it claims are both sides’ positions on its website.

According to the information on the website, the union is demanding a three-year contract with an average annual increase in compensation of 6.7 percent while the Board is offering a 3.6 percent increase. The increase is a calculation of both salary and benefits.

At this point, the teachers are waiting for a response to their latest proposal, according to Univerv Director Mark Stein, an Illinois Education Association official.

“We are kind of hoping they will come to the table and settle this rather than negotiate in the press,” Stein said.

The Board takes the position on the school’s website the Lake Forest teachers are among the highest paid on the state and the current Board proposal keeps them in that position. Though no mediation date is set, the Board claims it is willing to talk.

“The Board has been, and remains, open to meeting with the union as needed to achieve a mutually acceptable contract” Board President Sharon Golan said. Stein maintains the union seeks further mediation and the Board refuses.

Union representative Chuck Gress is unwilling to say anything publically about the negotiations. “We are still in the midst of the collective bargaining process and will not be commenting on the specifics of the negotiations at this time,” he said.

For more news and updates from Lake Forest-Lake Bluff Patch, subscribe to our daily e-newsletter, Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Mary Ann Beardman August 1, 2012 at 01:31 pm
The board should stick to their offer and the teachers should accept 3.6. Lake Forest teachers are the highest paid on the North Shore and as a taxpayer I am shocked that in this economy anyone would not be satisfied with this offer. Hope the board does not cave in to this unreasonable demand. Mary Ann Beardman
HJB August 1, 2012 at 02:43 pm
If one considers that benefits are included in the percentage increase, I would have to say that even the worst case scenario, a 6.7 percent increase, is reasonable, though obviously our board should reduce that number. Many business people would snap at the chance to keep total labor costs within 6.7 percent of prior year when benefits are included because benefit costs are rising more rapidly than that percentage. What troubles me most is the anti-teacher sentiment that I keep hearing expressed in the community. As for being "shocked" that the teachers would not agree to this, their demand is not outrageous--in fact, the parties are only 3.1 percent apart, hardly insurmountable, but not necessarily a gap best narrowed by negativism or media reports. Still, I urge the teachers to consider their current compensation ranking, the small increases in neighboring districts, the dismal economy and the fact that most workers in the private sector have been paying for at least a portion of their health care since 1980. Most agreements are in exercise in mutual frustration, and I remain hopeful that both sides will move to the middle. Keep in mind that the opening salvo from both sides is most likely something they don't expect to achieve. I wish both sides good faith and good reason as you meet.
Gary August 1, 2012 at 05:27 pm
I don't understand why they are getting any increase at all. They get paid very well already, and they should be glad to have job security in this horrible economic environment. Many in our town are suffering and I'm shocked that they would demand that we pay them even more.
In fact the case can be made that they should be asked to take a pay cut in order to make room in our local budget for the giant hit we are going to take in our property taxes if the Democrats down in Springfield manage to transfer the responsibility for State pensions to local communities. The unions are hitting us from both sides, and if they get their way, we will see another huge increase in property taxes... with no additional benefits to show for it and no offsetting tax cut. The teachers are paying union bosses to buy political influence in Springfield and hire professional union negotiators to extract as much money as they can from unpaid school board members. They take as much money as they can from every community they are in and they aren't shy about it. If they are going to do that, then we need to deal with them on an equally hard-nosed footing and leave behind the traditional notion that we are dealing with a bunch of nice little old school marms. They play serious hard ball. We have to play hardball too or they will take everything we've got.... and everything we'll ever make.
Joe August 1, 2012 at 07:16 pm
Our Lake Forest High School teachers need to reengage with reality. Where else are employees getting 6% increases in compensation? Where else can you get family health insurance coverage for FREE? As taxpayers we are the ones paying for all of this. It is time to stop this insanity.
Larry Smith August 2, 2012 at 01:59 am
Joe, where do you get your information? Free family health insurance for teachers? Not in any public school in Illinois! Teachers contribute a considerable amount of money for either individual health insurance or individual with family. Their policies are part of a group policy which helps defray costs, but it's still quite a lot. That being said, a 3.6% annual increase is respectable and should be taken seriously by the teachers union.
Life is Good August 2, 2012 at 03:20 am
I disagree with the 3.6% annual increase! Who else is getting that sort of increase? Certainly not me as well as many others.
Joe August 2, 2012 at 09:38 am
Larry, The Board's letter says that the district pays 100% of the health insurance premium. That sounds like FREE to me. And the district gets its money from us taxpayers. So I come back to my question. Who else gets free family health insurance?
Me August 2, 2012 at 11:37 am
Put the taxpayers in charge of this negotiation and the teachers would be seeing and even harder line on the increases. In general, the taxpayers say fire all of them and start over. Teachers know that they can cause a huge disruption in the community if they strike and thus they are in a strong negotiating position. We as taxpayers need to stick to our guns and not give in to this greedy bunch.
Just look at how the weak School Board was manipulated Harry Griffith and how they caved in offering a huge package to his successor. This Board is not in touch with reality and we will all suffer as a result.
Gary August 2, 2012 at 01:00 pm
Feel free to run for the school board.
Reformers will have to run as independents against the Lake Forest Caucus selected candidates though.
Shirley August 2, 2012 at 02:41 pm
@Gary: We finally agree!! The teachers need a reality check. Gary has stated our position as tax payers well. My household has not seen an income increase since 2007, I pay my own health insurance and my real estate taxes 17% last year after protesting them the previous year!
I'm sure my daughter ( w/MEd teaching at LFA) would gladly cross a picket line to secure a highly paid job at LFHS, and she would be awesome. She could call up other fellow highly qualified MEd's w/ESL endorsements and second-language endorsements. Wake-up LFHS teachers: there are a lot of highly qualified unemployed young teachers out there who would love to have your job.
JC August 2, 2012 at 09:50 pm
The LFHS teachers should get a dose of reality. They are one of the highest compensated HS teachers unions in the country, they get generous automatic salary step increases for most of their career and have job tenure that makes them almost immune from firing, they have gold-plated pensions with COLA's that for many of them will earn them more in retirement than when they taught, they work 75% of the hours vs the private sector allowing them to supplement their income in summers, they have not taken on any risk of building their retirement funds nor had to save for it, they have some of the smallest class sizes in the country, they teach in one of the most desirable areas of the country, it appears that we have paid their HC, and on and on and on...
A huge thanks to the the board for delivering a BAFO. If the teachers don't want to take the deal on the table, let them strike and let's move on hiring replacements ASAP.
Joe August 3, 2012 at 02:52 pm
Will our children once again get to see the teachers in their solidarity t-shirts and hear them complain about having to work without a contract? It wasn't very impressive last fall. How will the teachers explain that 3% was insufficient for them when the rest of us are getting smaller or no raises at all?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Lake Forest-Lake Bluff Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something