Board, Union Fail to Reach Agreement But School Resumes Monday
The Board filed an unfair labor practice claim against the LFEA. Mandatory attendance at Lake Forest High School will resume Monday.
After six and a half hours of discussion Friday, the Board and the LFEA failed to come to an agreement to end the now three-day old strike.
Lake Forest High School will re-open on Monday morning as a mandatory student attendance day, with a full day of programming being offered. The school will initially be using a temporary replacement staff, but the board noted in a statement that they "strongly believe that our children and community need our own excellent teaching professionals. That said, we deeply regret that we have had to authorize legal council to advise the Board on the issue of permanent replacement workers."
A spokesperson for the Board noted that at 10 a.m. Friday morning, the Board submitted a last, best offer. By 4:20 p.m., the Board claimed that the LFEA did not submit its "last, best offer," at which point the mediator suspended the discussions for the day.
The LFEA, however, claimed in a statement that it gave the Board a written counterproposal that included financial concessions, which did not receive a response from the Board.
The Board said in a statement that they had offered to defer the two-tier salary schedule to a board and faculty committee, and also offered to phase in the HMO insurance change. The LFEA did not, however, agree to the offer. The issue of salary also remains a contentious issue, with the LFEA demanding an increase of 5-6.5 percent increase per year. (The Board said that it was not able to disclose its "last best offer").
In a statement released after Friday's negotiations, the LFEA stated: "The LFEA remained on site even after the Federal Mediator had officially closed the meeting. The LFEA waited until the Board left the building with the hope that negotiations might continue."
Board President Sharon Golan stated in a press release Friday evening: "Each day the strike progresses the adverse impact on our students increases. The Board's primary goal remains the same - to serve our students."
In their released statement, the Board noted that teachers have the right to participate in the strike, or the right to come to work on Monday. They will not be disciplined for any action.
Today the Board filed an unfair labor practice claim with the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board. The LFEA filed an unfair labor practice claim against the Board on Sept. 11. In the Board's claim, they noted that the LFEA failed to bargain in good faith as exhibited by:
-"Conducting a strike authorization vote prior to the onset of mediation and three months before final offers were exchanged";
-"Delaying bargaining until the start of the school year by continually refusing to meet over the summer";
-"Releasing its last offer to media outlets on Aug. 17, 2012, before the District had a chance to review the proposal and one week before it was set for publication by the IELRB."
-"Refusing to attend a mediation session where representatives from the District and a mediator were present on Sept. 10, 2012- two days before a scheduled strike";
-"Adhering to an illegal bargaining proposal that the District pay its members an uncapped amount from interest funds that the District accuses, despite the fact that such a proposal would violate both the Illinois School and the Illinois Grant Funds Recovery Act."
The LFEA released a statement Friday night that they would be willing to meet with the Board on Saturday to continue negotiations to resolve the strike. It read: "The Lake Forest Educational Association urges the BOE to call the mediator and continue to negotiate with us tomorrow at 10 o'clock [a.m.]. We will be waiting for you at West Campus."
The Board did not arrive to continue negotiations this morning. Editor's correction: A previous version of this story stated that the LFEA and the Board agreed on the HMO and two-tier issues. This is not correct, and these issues remain in negotiations.For more news and updates from Lake Forest-Lake Bluff Patch, subscribe to our daily e-newsletter, ”Like” us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
Sherry Adams
6:25 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012
So glad to hear the Board is standing their ground! Don't give in!!
Jon
12:10 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
So, Teachers:
What you're saying is that in order for you to help the students, you need to harm them?
Smooth_Operator
9:51 am on Monday, September 17, 2012
I got one for you, when the contract is finally settled have the students strike the teachers...
Gary
6:37 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012
Lake Forest CHSD 115 spent $21,931 per student in the 2009-10 school year, compared to an statewide average of $13,911 among similarly sized districts. We were ranked 6th in the State in 2010.
http://schools.chicagotribune.com/district/lake-forest-chsd-115/#operating-expenditures
We are now spending $43,882,876 / 1780 students = $24,653 per student.
Is $24,653 per student enough money to get the job done? Apparently not.
Against Guns
6:53 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
For all those people who live in LF/LB who pay real estate taxes, there has been a significant increase from last year. This is due to having all the towns people fork up to pay health benefits for the teachers. I heard that one of the things the LFHS Board told the union to have the teachers pay $25/month for health insurance and they baulked.
Now one my neighbors in LB is the art teacher (I hope pays her RE taxes) is paying for other teachers and her own healthcare. Should the teachers leave our towns and not have to pat twice?
Hmmmm6
11:56 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Gary, our per student costs are going to be higher because we are a smaller school. We nevertheless want the same opportunities afforded kids in New Trier and Stevenson, who have much larger student populations to divide their costs over. Many Lake Forest parents were interested in the benefits the smaller size provides. The simple fact is that those benefits come with some costs.
Fiscal Sanity
6:50 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012
Hang tough you Board members! I am currently earning 1/2 of what I did three years ago. I have advanced degrees. I am a parent and "care" about my community and the future.
Time to adjust those that have been stuck in academia to the new reality. Be glad you have any job....you appear sooooo greedy!!!
Scout
6:58 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012
Question: If a teacher chooses NOT to come in to work on Monday (and they decide to strike), shouldn't he or she be dismissed from his/her job? The statement says that the Board will not take disciplinary action regardless of what a teacher does. If a teacher doesn't show up for work, he or she should be released from his/her job.
Gary
7:09 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012
Over 6,000 state retirees get $100,000+ per year in pension. Is there anyone out there besides government employees who gets a $100,000+ pension?
At 5% annual yield, it would take $2 million per retiree in a savings account to support $100,000 per year indefinitely.
That $400,000 pension is $34,500 per month... for doing nothing.
Last Name Annual Pension Pension Paid Out to Date
Das Gupta 414,471 2,790,107 SURS
Abraham 402,630 1,773,973 SURS
Barmada 386,334 4,430,947 SURS
Mafee 359,360 1,766,637 SURS
Abcarian 328,865 929,095 SURS
Albrecht 327,623 1,395,697 SURS
Ausman 300,868 1,079,431 SURS
Wilensky 280,450 1,830,477 SURS
Forman 273,389 2,270,657 SURS
Sugar 266,113 1,791,113 SURS
Bangser 261,681 1,233,651 TRS
Bazzani 257,857 2,157,996 SURS
Honig 255,899 1,807,572 SURS
Milner 253,783 1,081,135 SURS
Folse 248,512 2,477,291 SURS
Schuler 246,736 1,457,610 SURS
Moss 243,789 1,389,041 SURS
Weaver 242,657 720,780 TRS
Lopata 240,046 1,775,912 SURS
Murray 238,882 776,365 TRS
Catalani 237,195 1,008,739 TRS
Rugg 236,460 937,320 SURS
Oldham 236,323 758,866 SURS
Pavel 235,638 1,424,609 SURS
Hintz 234,810 1,287,409 TRS
Hmmmm6
11:33 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Gary, don't demagogue this issue. You are a very smart guy and know the time value of money would require less than $2 million to generate an annuity of $100,000, but you are right, its a great deal of money and given our state's woeful situation, I would not be planning on receiving these amounts if I were a teacher. The likelihood that the pensions are going to be changed (including who pays for them--ie, local or state) is the elephant in the room, and it makes it very hard for either side to plan and negotiate with certainty. Everybody is aware of this, but overstating the problem is not the right path to a solution.
Gary
12:23 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
With an assumed annual growth rate of 5%, which is way above where we are now. The annuity would have to be $1,719,290 to guarantee an annual withdrawal of $100,000 over 35 years. And we're not including all the pension COLA increases in that calculation, so the actual number would be pushed way higher if we did.
http://www.bankrate.com/calculators/investing/annuity-calculator.aspx
I stand corrected, but the accusation of demagoguery is hardly justified. You have granted the overall point however, so there's no point in belaboring this. Solving the pension Ponzi mess is going to be a real battle in Illinois.
Hmmmm6
10:54 am on Monday, September 17, 2012
Gary--Again, time value of money. You are smart and I know you know what that means. The teachers are contributing a rate of their pay each year to their pension. Those moneys accumulate for no less than 25 years, in many instances longer, before payout, along with board contributions. That is the time value of money. Yes, they probably pull out more than they contribute based on both contributions plus earnings, but let's take a look at Social Security. Everyone knows that the average social security recipient takes out more than their contributions yield. So, you already backed off 15% of your original claim, and your $1.7 million also has to be discounted by the contributions and board match. By the way, I would say both systems need to be reformed, but at least let's have integrity in our local discussions. That is something we can achieve if we are all honest.
Me
11:28 am on Monday, September 17, 2012
@Hmmm - I ran the numbers and posted them in another thread. Using the rather extreme earnings rate of 8.5%, the value of a teacher's pension when they retire is about $2.3 million. In order to reach that number, there must be very significant annual contributions amounting to nearly 30% of the salary.
CJ
9:16 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012
BOE: Please continue to hang tough!
It is very telling that the overwhelming response at our two community news websites to this issue is to support you and the students; I think that the majority of the commentators here are community residents so you are getting a good sense of how our community thinks about this issue and the support you have from all of us.
I hope you can hire replacements for the strikers sooner rather than later and bring our students lives back to normal asap. Frankly, hiring 150 people could probably be done in a matter of a few weeks and you can hire subs to take us until everyone is replaced. You will receive excellent resumes from people wanting these jobs! Also, there will be an OUTPOURING from the community to help in the transition to the new instructional staff!
Unfortunately these strikers will get to experience what workers in the private sector (aka "the real world") have experienced in the last 4 years--going on Cobra for their health benefits, not accumulating years of service towards their gold-plated pensions, claiming unemployment (can they even qualify if they are fired due to striking?), a long period of unemployment to find their next job, maybe never finding another teaching job paying them what they are paid at LFHS, etc. Their biggest loss though is our respect for all of them and the turmoil they are putting our kids and community through.
Morag Bishop
11:29 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012
ok
One Opinion
11:47 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012
Is it true that New Trier is a non-union district?
Mark Stein
12:53 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
No.
One Opinion
11:48 pm on Friday, September 14, 2012
There are so many really STRONG and DEDICATED teachers at LFHS, but unfortunately there are too many that abuse the system and do nothing but the minimum to get by. Parents and students are tired of it, and this fact has caused us to get angry now with all that has happened. I can honestly say while our (my family) income has significantly diminished over the years, we have fought hard to stay here because of those REALLY GOOD teachers. They have earned our respect and our desire to find a way to pay them top salaries, but PLEASE good teachers, put pressure on those you know who have brought your barganing power and professionalism down. They have hurt your ability to retain community support.
Fiscal Sanity
9:46 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
+1
Kristin Rol Gannon
2:23 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Stay strong board. Hire replacements. I have no sympathy for employees who abandon their job in favor of picketing. In the really world you get replaced.
Scout
6:34 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Highland Park High School District is a non-union district.
mshoe
8:00 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
The may be non-union, but the have collective bargaining for all staff with a salary schedule that include steps etc. So they are basically "union" without the paperwork.
Susan
7:10 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
We all prefer our LFHS teachers on Monday but if they cannot seem to understand the world they teach in, the world we all live in and that they have a very fair compensation package then it is time to make other arrangements.
I am happy to send my children back with substutute teachers.
commonsense
10:24 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
If you think professionals are expensive, wait until you try amateurs.
Peter
7:20 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
After all our students and high school community went through last year...
LFHS, the BOE etc.. stressed the importance of Emotional Wellness for the students.
Well, guess what teachers? What you are doing to our kids, YOUR students,YOUR athletes has NOTHING to do with keeping them well emotionally.
You should all be ashamed of yourselves!
Scout Parent
8:11 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
I couldn't agree more. I hope everyone is trying to keep in mind what this stressful situation is doing to these innocent students. They have done nothing wrong yet they are the one's whose lives are being impacted the most by this strike. What a wonderful LFHS community we have. Everyday this strike continues, the core of this community is weakened. Teachers, as you were all high school students, please think about how your actions are negatively impacting them as you decide how you personally should proceed. Is the difference in salary you are disputing worth more to you than your dedication to your students and why you became a teacher in the first place? Please allow them to enjoy their high school experience just as you all had the chance to enjoy yours. The choice is yours. I am hopeful you choose the students on Monday. The teacher community I thought I knew would.
commonsense
10:27 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Curious. Everyone here seems to blame the teachers. I would have more respect for your comments if you took both sides to task. Both sides need to sit down and hammer out an agreement.
RationalTht
4:15 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@commonsense - we have "tried" to look at both sides, and we cannot seem to understand how, in today's fiscal environment, the teachers can be asking for a 6% raise PER YEAR for the next few years. It is incomprehensible.
Robert T
7:28 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Bravo to the board! Let the replacements do the job. It won't be hard to beat the current teachers quality.
Fiscal Sanity
9:48 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Word!
Maximus
9:17 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Robert T how can you claim that a replacement "teacher" can help to produce the high quality of education achieved by LFHS? The current faculty in community with the student body achieved both state and national recognition for excellence.
Shirley
7:26 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012
Agreed !
Me
7:45 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Since the Board has on the "two tiered system" and the Cadillac insurance plan, there is only one thing remaining,,,,,MONEY. Now we are down to the core item. The teachers can no longer hide behind the charade that "it is for the children". They have been exposed. This is about pure, unadulterated greed.
Fiscal Sanity
9:49 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Me is correct!
LB Dad
7:48 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
BOE - Do not give in, you have already offered far too much during these extraordinary times. FDR was absolutely correct, public workers should not be allowed to organize.
Fiscal Sanity
9:50 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
One of the only things I agree with FDR on.....but he foresaw these troubles!
Dave
8:20 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Concerned Taxpayer
How much more can they take from us. Unions are the problem just look to Wisconsin. In Illinois the Private sector unions(construction,truckers,operators,etc.)are getting weaker due to non-union competition. Unions are getting stronger in the Gov. sector(police,fire,teachers,etc.) due to no competition. With the way the economy is I'm sure we can find better more qualified teachers for even LESS money. Reagan Fired the air traffic controllers in the 80's. LFHS Board start firing. Thank You Coach Spagnoli for crossing the picket line. We support the Board 100%
Fiscal Sanity
9:53 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
It is one of the most advantagious times to replace these greedy people. I bet if we let the word out we would get hundreds of applications for each opening, from qualified teachers at 2/3rds of the current pay scale!
I know my neice, who has a Masters of Education would jump at the chance to earn sixty thousand dollars a year!!
Sue Johnson
8:36 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
BOE - HEY - there are plenty of us who disagree with you!
INCREASE the SALARY offer to the teachers! The limited raises offered are demoralizing. Could you live on the teachers' salaries??
Yes, we need to look at pensions, benefits and tenure, the lack of rigor in the CP classes - there is plenty to not like about the practices we have in place. But where have you been on these issues? Restricting teachers' pay is never going to bring a positive result. Teaching is a tough job and our teachers work hard, especially with the larger class sizes that you've let occur over the past few years.
The concessions you've made already were the right thing to do. Now, INCREASE YOUR SALARY OFFER!! As one student was quoted "we are being cheap". I'd also say greedy. We do have fiscal problems now (the district, and most of us personally), but please respect the teachers' role in our community and work for savings in other areas - NOT teacher's salaries!!
Mosober
8:45 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@sue johnson: You can pay my share.
RationalTht
9:06 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@Could you live on $106,000 a year - almost DOUBLE the average teacher's salary in the state. All this for working 9 months out of the year and a guaranteed pension at 55 for 75% of your salary for the rest of your life. Add to that the fact that you pay NOTHING for "Cadillac" insurance as identified by the ACA that will cause the district an additional penalty.
Fiscal Sanity
9:59 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Ms. Johnson....you just don't get it! Why should we pay a multiple of what these teachers can be replaced for?
We can restaff the whole place and bring the average compensation down 25 or 30% with no reduction in quality of teachers. Those of us not hiding in a tax supported union cannot continue to be held hostage and strong-armed into paying too much any more.
Listen up, we don't have the money.....and even if we did why should we waste it by paying too much for labor. Replace the whole lot of them with people more concerned with teaching and less concerned with what is in their contract to protect their bloated compensation!
commonsense
10:43 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Thank you Sue. Some people posting here, while passionate, do not understand the numbers of people passionately behind the teachers.
Let me repeat myself. Both sides need to quit suing each other, get to a table in a room with no windows, remove the heated partisans from both sides, maybe get rid of the lawyers, and get this done. Disallow bathroom breaks if necessary!
Hmmmm6
11:49 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Sue, you have great courage to post these views on this site, and its true, plenty of parents would like their children back in school, in their classes, and not compelled to attend "instructional programming." Both parties need to compromise to do right by the kids. Adults squabble and kids lose.
Shirley
7:32 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012
Yes, I could most definitely live on these salaries with my total health care paid! Get real!! And, except for a handful of phenomenal teachers at the high school, the rest are at best mediocre.
I had 3 children there.
Realist
2:23 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012
You are way off. I am a nurse with a Master's degree. For me to make $100,000 per year I would have to work 7 days a week for 12 months. As it is I work weekends, holidays, and in the middle of the night. I really don't have a pension to speak of and have been a nurse for over 20 years. Everyone I know has had their pensions deleted and their salaries cut.
The teachers are not the real reason for the excellent scores, but the families that are supportive enough to get tutors. I don't know of anyone who has not hired a tutor especially for the ACT's.
We all have made many concessions in this horrible economy. They need to get real and be happy they have a job that is safe and cushy.
Mosober
8:42 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Stay strong BOE. Its all about choice teachers. Take your pick.....
LF Parent
8:59 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Sue Johnson get a grip. Large class sizes? Average class size is 23. Teaching a tough job? Really? Hardly crime fighting! 12 weeks a year holiday! A beautiful working environment, students who have a drive to succeed, and a community that was behind them. And then there's the guaranteed benefits (don't get that in the private sector), and Tenure - great for the really good teachers but sometimes we are stuck with the slobs, stuck without the ability to get rid of them.
Most of us don't have the financial resources to accede to their demands and realize that it is unrealistic and selfish to demand it and to hold our children's education to ransom.
Think harder
9:28 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
The board is funny. Legal "council"? Sorry folks that's Counsel. Who are these people?!
LTH
9:29 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@ Sue Johnson - I completely agree.
Fiscal Sanity
10:01 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
LTH, it is obvious to me that yoiu and Sue have never competed in private business.
commonsense
10:47 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@Fiscal Privatization is not the solution for everything. Certainly not for elementary and secondary education. We already have private education...it is called universities and colleges. They work well. Gee, I wonder why private colleges are so expensive? If competition worked in education, private colleges would be cheap. Where are they?
Fiscal Sanity
10:56 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Common sense, a little research will show you that college costs did not start skyrocketing until government subsidies became widespread.
Another example of unintended outcomes from Big Brother helping us out!
PS- You will find a simular pattern with medical costs....as soon as they started "helping" the train jumped the rails!
One Opinion
12:24 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
"I wonder why private colleges are so expensive? If competition worked in education, private colleges would be cheap. Where are they?"
They aren't because these institutions charge "the paying customers" double so they can charge/fund the "subsidized customers" half... or nothing at all. Hard on those of us who aren't affluent enough to afford the inflated tuition, yet do not qualify for the need-based discounts. No where in a college application (that I have seen) does it ask for "future pension and benefits" to be disclosed when applying for financial aide, yet if you are self-employed, self-insured, and have to save/invest in assets for your retirement down the road, the financial aide department records this as net worth... which causes many entrepreneurs to be ineligible for any form of discount. My husband and I will be working till the day we die to help fund our childrens' education. Our income is contingent upon customer satisfaction and working to our best ability, always taking pride in all that we do.
Think harder
9:57 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
I think I'm going to list my house for sale before the value goes down more. Who will want to pay the list prices for our homes when we have a school system of stay at home moms and out of work traders reaching math and science? Read the Tribune article today for more perspective. This isn't good.. My kids will get a better education in Deerfield which, by the way, pays comparable salaries to its teachers..I moved here for the good schools and low crime. I can find that elsewhere...LF I'm finding, is really nothing special...
Gary
12:13 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Deerfield is non-union. You are recommending that we leave a union run high school and go to a non-union high school to get a better education.
Your opinion is duly noted. Thanks for your contribution to the debate.
RationalTht
12:38 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@Gary - Deerfield also scores higher that LFHS on statewide tests. They do better with less, though I don't know how.
Shirley
7:41 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012
You just proved all points!! Deerfield rates higher & is non-union!! LOL
And, by the way, this BOE will replace these teachers with quality applicants whose resumes are stacked in HR!! LFHS does not currently hold a monopoly on "great"teachers.
Me
10:10 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
A system that guarantees salary increases to all, regardless of talent or drive is not one that promotes excellence. Such a system will encourage the poorest performers to hang on for dear life, the average performers to remain average because there is no reward for them if they improve and it will demoralize the excellent performers because they will see all of those below them getting the identical rewards for doing far less work.
Just keep in mind that this is the exact system that the Union has called a strike to protect and they have taken our children's education hostage to protect a system that rewards and celebrates mediocrity.
Fiscal Sanity
10:58 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Me is really smart and I agree with everything that Me has added to this debate.
Go Me!!!
LB MOM
10:10 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Sue Johnson - Question for you...Do you hold that conviction for ALL the teachers? I sure don't. Collective bargaining is antiquated and protects the teachers that should have been dismissed long ago, let alone guaranteed jobs and salary increases. Why to the great teachers let themselves be brought down to protect the bad ones? The teachers can ask for whatever they want, but we don't have to give it to them. The disappointment is when they don't get everything their way they take their toys and leave the sandbox. Really immature! If our BOE has been fiscally responsible and there are fund, why do the teachers demand it goes to them or they won't teach? This is all about the teachers, nothing about the students. Grow up!
Julio
11:15 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
If these teachers do not show up on Monday, I'm certain, that should they be permanently replaced, they're going to rue the day that they opted to strike. Take it from someone who lost their job due to "downsizing" and has been unable to find a job for over a year now, despite peer recommendations and a successful background. It's horrible out there and these teachers seem to sadly be tuned out to that as they picnic, ah, oops, I mean picket on the front lawn at East campus. I pay Cobra, which is $425 per month just for me...in addition to house bills. Thank God my car is paid off. I'd be happy to be earning $60K at this point and wouldn't blink at shelling out a mere $25 per month for insurance. Get your collective heads out of the north shore sand and start looking at the real world. At the end of the day, the union reps will have jobs, but you may not. Is it worth the risk in this economy? I can definitively say not. By declining to show up to work on Monday you're putting your future in jeopardy and you'll be looking back at this a year from now shaking your heads wishing that you had lived with the relative riches you have now. I hope the ones that cross the picket line on Monday are spared because I cannot imagine that all teachers feel the same as the union is projecting.
Rasme
11:25 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
BOE – Stay strong. Not a penny more than your current generous proposal for salary increases! The teachers have shown their commitment to students by their unprofessional and cowardly CHOICE to walk out on them. There have been many, many good teachers at LFHS who positive contributions to my children’s development. However, either due to union inspired entitlement or just believing their own press they have obviously lost their way. There is no other way to explain their behavior.
This will not end well. I have seen the aftermath of similar situations. The students have already lost respect for them as they watched them parade like mindless sheep in front of their school – in addition to appropriately blaming them for forfeited athletic events and cancelled commitments. The old guard teachers will become more embittered and entitled before they retire or are somehow moved out. Unfortunately, the really good up-and-coming younger teachers will be so jaded by this experience – polluted by the union rhetoric, bullied into striking, and ultimately feeling caught in the middle of a bad situation – will soon leave. Or worse, they will stay with diminished optimism and passion.
The number one focus has to be recruiting high quality new teachers. They are out there and are working with -and for - far less. The last priority is appeasing the current staff whose effectiveness is declining each day.
Time to move forward – it is too late to turn back.
Neighbor
11:26 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
BOE, please don't give in to these teachers. This is not the late 80s when money was plentiful. In the real world, there are not large raises - it is 2-3 percent and in recent years no raise at all. So just be happy you have a job! Our family has gone without a job twice during the recession. Maybe all who post in favor of the teachers union have extra money to hand out - a lot of us do not.
Fiscal Sanity
11:37 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
I wonder what the voluntary attrition rate is. Does anyone ever leave voluntarily?
At my company we try to pay just under the standard wage in each department. This is not a money saving move, it is so that we do not "trap" people at our company because they cannot go out and earn the same amount elsewhere.
This is just another facet of overpaying our teachers, we end up holding hostage those people who would rather teach elsewhere but cannot because of the disparate pay rates.
(Just my average of over $100,000 worth!)
Fred
11:46 am on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Is it ever wise, or right, for an adult human being to intentionally harm a child?
Jen
12:02 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Answer: no.
LF_Dad
12:44 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
How the real world gets a 6% raise: Obtain a better job offer that pays 6% more, THEN bargain. If you can *prove* the market exists for your services, then congratulations, you've earned it.
Right or wrong, it appears it's a pretty small market these days for highly paid teachers. These teachers haven't done their homework and god help them finding a new job if they get fired, especially the older ones. 8% unemployment has made raises a rarity in every sector. They will most likely make less than they are making today, while LFHS will likely pay less to fill the positions lost if terminated.
It will be a difficult lesson in supply and demand and I feel sorry so many good teachers have been duped into such unrealistic expectations given the state of our economy. I hope the teachers (forget the union) come to their senses and cross the picket line come Monday. I'd forgive every one of them for the past three days if they show up on Monday. After that, it's time for the market to see who is right.
Jen
1:49 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
The real unemployment rate is much higher than 8% because that figure does not include the long term unemployed who have simply given up looking for employment as well as the underemployed. I've seen the rate of unemployed more like 10-11% which certainly accords with the rate at which my friends and acquaintances are unemployed ( and these are double degree types). I, too, hope the teachers come to their senses, cross the picket line ( if there is one) and return to work as their demands are completely and utterly unrealistic.
Scout
12:56 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
BOE: Do not give in; hold your ground. Not only are LFHS Dist. 115 parents and taxpayers taking note of these past few days' events, but Dist. 67 parents and taxpayers are also interested in what comes of these negotiations. There is much talk across this community in favor of a firm stance on your already extremely generous 2.6% offer (for this year). As we watched our previous Supt. and you spend tax payer dollars on excessive administrative overhead (7 Asst. Supts. at one point in the recent past) and unnecessary expenses (i.e. lawyer fees to defend and cover up a sexting scandal), please be aware that taxpayers in both districts have a vested interest in maintaining fiscal responsibility and are actively following these developments.
Jim Anderson
2:49 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
I know that many teachers want to be back in the classroom.
CJ
3:37 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Jim, I am not surprised as I think that common sense will ultimately prevail here. These strikers are not stupid; many are well educated and have spouses, parents, kids or friends facing the same private sector economic reality that is being written about here by virtually everyone. This is a situation where Mr. Gress and his LFEA leadership team have taken a ridiculous position without having a way to back off to save face even though it is unreasonable and untenable. Furthermore, these people are not negotiators---they are teachers and they just didn't know any better and they followed the Union blindly. They could not have seen the massive backlash in the community on this issue coming as the BOE has rubber-stamped generous raises in D115 and D67 for decades and decades---it is the only way how a Driver Ed teacher could make $168k!
Once a few of them cross the picket line, there will be a herd and this will be over. The healing from the distrust and animosity though will take years to overcome. I also have faith in our administrators and BOE to put a plan to allow the students to make up the work asap. It's the forfeited athletic contests that is such a disappointment--the Union leadership should be fired for this as it is just unconscionable what they are putting these great kids through.
Love2read
3:12 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@Jen, the statistic that you are referring to, is the U-6 number. This is frequently called the "real" unemployment rate. The current U-6 number is 14.7%. Data is from bls.gov
This current walkout is puzzling.
Other teachers in other districts, making approximately the same or less money are still teaching. Many of these districts have been giving 2-3% raises for a few years now without a strike.
Currently my wife pays 23% towards her health insurance in her school district.
LFHS teachers feel they should only have to contribute 5-10%.
Raises have been around 3%. No strikes. Everyone is happy to have a job. Current salary schedule is a little lower than LF.
What's so important and earth shattering that LFHS teachers need to tear this community apart?
seeze
4:21 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
I find it completely disheartening that the overwhelming majority of respondents is so venomously, and publicly against the teachers. Much like the political climate in the country today, there appears to be no middle ground in the minds of those who are posting - the issue is being portrayed as black and white with a wide gulf in between. There isn't even a suggestion that the issues might be nuanced, that the teachers might have a point too. And the rhetoric will undoubtedly (and sadly) have a negative long term effect on the climate at LFHS once the strike is settled. It disturbs me that adults are speaking so disrespectfully of the teachers and modeling such poor behavior for our students. How about a dialogue wherein the kids are made to understand that it is possible for two groups of well intended people to have serious and legitimate disagreement, and to work within an accepted forum/form to reach consensus without smearing one party or the other?
Rasme
4:53 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@seeze – sorry but it is too late for that position. Many people had an open mind until the teachers walked out on their students. The teachers either bought into the propaganda from their union “leadership” and / or were bullied to go along with the strike. Maybe they thought their extortion would work and they would get their way before the students got hurt – at least I hope they considered the consequences of their actions. Now many are stuck and well aware of the union intimidation and retaliation they will face if they cross the picket line. I know they (and you) want the BOE to give in so this whole thing can be over but rewarding their poor judgment and irresponsible behavior would be the wrong message.
Fred
5:05 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
seeze:
Is it ever wise, or right, for an adult human being to intentionally harm a child?
Concerned Citizen
4:29 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
To further inform the discussion and to support the proposition that the higher the pay, the more advanced the degree, and the longer the tenure, do not the best teachers make, I did some research on high school teachers who last received the Illinois Golden Apple Award. (The award rotates on a 3-year cycle, so that the last year of awards to high school teachers was in 2010.) Of the 10 recipients, 2 were teachers at private schools, so no public salary data was available. However, for the other recipients, the following information was available:
Last Name 2011 Salary Education/Experience High School
Curtis $62,500 Bachelors/8 Years Phoenix Military Academy
Gourley $97,261 Masters/13 Years Thornton Fractional South
Jain $86,508 Masters/7 Years Stevenson
Kline-Thomas $53,873 Bachelors/5 Years Clark Academic Prep
Moon $69,687 Masters/10 Years King College Prep
Reed $112,618 Masters/14 Years Niles North
Reedy $63,522 Masters/7 Years Thomas Kelly
Turk $86,928 Masters/8 Years Chicago Academy
Deadcatbounce
10:31 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
almost all public school teachers have a masters, especially after their fifth year teaching
Robocop
5:02 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Well said, seeze. As a teacher for a different district, I'd like to say that I support the LFHS teachers during this difficult time. I'm a young teacher with a low salary, and I recognize that the best teachers are those that have had many years to hone their craft. Some teachers may be doing well financially now, but after how many years of doing the same job for less pay? As teachers we choose to go into education versus the private sector knowing there are certain trade offs. Two of the perks of teaching are certainly the built-in raises and good health care plans. However, even our $100,000 salaries (after working 20+ years) can't compete with what we could be earning in the private sector. Ultimately, denigrating teachers makes it harder to do a job that we claim to consider so "valuable", educating children. While I feel bad for those in the private sector who have lost pensions and healthcare, teachers are already taking a paycut simply by being teachers -- especially the kinds of people you have working in Lake Forest. You see them as asking for more in a time where unemployment is high-- I understand that's upsetting. The solution isn't to fire them all. I find the argument "I'm suffering and so should you!" to be ludicrous. The economy is getting better, slowly. The board should be working harder to reach an acceptable agreement.
Concerned Citizen
5:42 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@Robocop You are correct that extreme arguments like "fire them all" or that "all teachers are overpaid" are neither consistent with the facts nor helpful to this important issue. However, the facts do not support the statements in your comments, either. If you were correct, then we would all look at the list of teachers and conclude that the ones with the most experience are the best. They are not. (Conversely, it would be incorrect to include that all the most experienced teachers or the most highly paid teachers are the worst.) The point is that we should assess teacher quality based directly on performance. Your statement about your being able to make more in the private sector is also not supported by the facts either, some examples being private school teachers, private driver instructors and fitness instructors. But, again, whether or not your statement is correct, it misses the mark. The point is that we should pay teacher market-based, performance-based salary and benefits. To that end, we need an apples-to-apples, comprehensive comparative evaluation, which includes all the relevant factors: job security (tenure), salary, work hours, vacation days, contributions to health care, pension benefits, etc. The problem is that the current compensation system doesn't do this. Finally, I agree that in any public debate like this, it's important to set a good example for our children: be respectful and fact-based.
Fiscal Reality
5:43 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
The argument you quote should read, "I'm suffering and you want me to suffer more!" by driving up property taxes in the district.
As for the disheartning nature of the black/white positions, I was unaware of just how many of my hard earned dollars were going to the high school teachers, as I am sure many other of the posters were. I am outraged that these teachers ARE BEING PAID SO MUCH,(Especially the benefits!), and would like to see what I believe are more normal figures.I am further outraged at the teachers reaction that they need even more, "for the good of the children".
Start over with new teachers that are not so greedy. The one thing that everyone seems to agree on is that we can attact educators of an equal or greater value for a lot less money!
CJ
6:11 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Robocop, I hate to pile on but do you not agree with anything here?
- You are not taking a pay cut "simply by being a teacher".
- You are getting a pension plan that doesn't exist in the private sector.
- You only work 75% of the time in a year that the rest of us do.
- You get raises just for showing up regardless of your work effort or outcomes with your kids.
Clearly these north shore district's teacher salary plans VERY MUCH DO compete with the private sector when you account for your supposed "perks". And, when is a "built in" raise a necessary perk--show me where this exists in the private sector?
If you really think you deserve or need more compensation, I encourage you to go find as equal of a paying job in the private sector. But don't use this as a lever for us to pay you more in your current gig just because you think you deserve it.
BTW, there is no evidence that simply years on the job makes a teacher better---you know that better than we all do as you see it first hand every day with your peers. Also, paying people more just because they have an advanced degree or grad courses is equally as crazy as there is no evidence that this necessarily makes the teacher better or more valuable. In fact, we end up paying more than what our kids really need. We don't need PhD's just because teachers have them...this is HS and not a university.
I wish you luck in your profession. We need good teachers and you sound passionate about it! :-)
Love2read
8:36 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
8:35 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@Robocop Your statement, "I find the argument "I'm suffering and so should you!" to be ludicrous." is very telling.
When unemployment levels are high, it obviously becomes tougher to get a job. This in turn reduces the need for employers to increase compensation. When things get really tough, employers can even reduce compensation packages below what they might have been paying a couple of years ago.
LFHS teachers are not being asked to suffer. They are being offered a raise in each of the next three years. They are also being asked, in my opinion, to start participating at a reasonable level in the increased cost of health care
Deadcatbounce
10:45 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
I take exception with "However, even our $100,000 salaries (after working 20+ years) can't compete with what we could be earning in the private sector". I don't see any marketable skills teachers have that the private sector values, except for the math and science teachers. Your skills would get you jobs as clerical workers at best, making no more than $30k. You have no idea what skills are transferable to the private sector.
LadyLiberty
5:08 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
For some reason, the only part of this story that piques my interest is that in its official statement, the Board spelled "counsel" wrong. It's "legal counsel," not "legal council."
I know it's nitpicking, but hey, it's an official release . . . about education.
Robocop
6:22 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@ConcernedCitizen I agree that not all teachers could have higher earning potential in the private sector. However, I think that science and math teachers easily could. I maintain, and this opinion may be unpopular here, that the free market doesn't always adequately determine the worth or value of a job. I'm not against reforming teacher evaluation systems to make them more effective indicators of job performance. The trouble with education is that it operates differently than a business, and it should. We are nationally mandated in this country to educate every single student. Popular education reform movements, like charter schools, often operate under the premise that they can push out difficult students and put them back into public school settings. All this is to say that evaluating teachers based on student performance is dangerous territory, because you end up penalizing teachers who want to work with disadvantaged students. Teachers have no control over the poverty level of their students or their family situations. It's difficult to have an apples-to-apples comparison between what teachers do and a private sector job because you are comparing apples and oranges. I don't know what the solution is-- I think it's a complex issue. What I do know is that I'd rather live in a country that overvalues teachers and educating children, than one that simultaneously holds them responsible for the life of every child while ridiculing them and taking away their pay.
RationalTht
6:33 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
You know, maybe if the unions did not make it difficult to get rid of teachers that were no longer serving the students (like the math teacher who was making fun of a student, only later noticing the student was standing 10' away. That teacher is still there. There are other examples of poor performance and teachers just putting in their time, but the level of effort to get rid of the teacher, and the repercussions faced by the children of parents who attempt it is too large.
One other thing, you mention many of the math / science teachers could easily make more outside - that does not seem to take into account pensions.
Concerned Citizen
6:39 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@Robocop. I'm sorry, I didn't think I said the performance evaluation should be based on student test scores. There are many other and better ways to evaluate performance. And, while I don't think I said that schools should operate completely like a business, I would contend that they should operate more like a business than they currently do, at least in terms of paying for performance and delivering value. I also don't understand the relevance of your comments about students below the poverty level and how that applies at LFHS, either. As I understand it, the issue at LFHS is what is the appropriate compensation system for teachers, and I agree that that issue is complex. Finally, your comment about what science and math teachers would make in the private sector is not correct. I work for a company that employs scientists, and the total compensation package at LFHS greatly exceeds the market-based rates for these outstanding scientists (most with Ph.D's) who work the entire year and don't get either a guaranteed pension, fully-paid health care or tenure.
Daniel
7:56 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
As a former student I know that LF teachers are truly the best, and deserve only the best. It is only far for them to get what they deserve and nothing less. They have helped so many of us get to where we are today whether it be providing extra help or letters of recommendation.
Love2read
8:26 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@Daniel, they already have some of the highest compensation packages in the country, and they walked out on the students.
Me
8:15 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
As I read all of the claims that LFHS will be relegated to backwater status because of the mass exodus of teachers and that there is no way to replace these supreme beings who are able to convey knowledge as no other mortal can, come back to reality and wonder, since there are only a handful of suburban schools capable of paying these salaries, where will they all go? It isn't as if they can displace other teachers. Can Chuck Gress go to Highland Park and say "I am the great and powerful Chuck Gress, I command you to fire your incumbent calculus teacher (whom no doubt the students and family hold in high regard) and hire me". No! Chuck will be back at LFHS because contrary to what they are telling us, there are more than 150 great teachers in Chicagoland who are eager to work for a salary that is in the top 1 1/2% instead of just the top 1%. If a teacher is going to switch jobs for a few hundred dollars a year, I have to question whether they are really a top teacher anyway.
Stevie Janowski
8:19 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Just read that the board is playing hard ball and told the teachers they had a meeting and the board didnt show. I like it hold your ground BOE, and teachers; cross or find a new job
Love2read
8:21 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
What would happen if...
1. We cut per student spending in half (about $10,000 per student)
2. We cut teacher annual pay by 30-40%
3. Made it much easier to get rid of under performing teachers
4. Removed the pension benefit
5. Social Security and 401k (403b) type savings plans were instituted
What type of person would be attracted to the teaching profession in such an institution?
What would happen to student performance?
Stevie Janowski
8:29 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Go read a book, because your comments are idiotic.
Fiscal Reality
9:24 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
You would pretty much end up with the quality of teachers that we find at St. Mary's, Woodlands, and The Academy.
They are all top notch too, so let's do it!
Fiscal Reality
9:27 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
PS- My niece is at Hotchkiss, she is recieving a great, non-union, education.
Deadcatbounce
10:52 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Those teachers at Christian heritage academy, one of the best schools in the country in north field, get paid a lot less than LF. How did that happen??
Love2read
8:37 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@Stevie Janowski, please elaborate
Stevie Janowski
8:40 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
What are you basing your comment where you list 5 ideas on? I have to ask, do you even pay taxes?
Love2read
8:44 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@Stevie Janowski
I look forward to your answer to the two questions that were asked.
Stevie Janowski
9:00 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
So is that a no on the taxes?
Love2read
9:22 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
Same house, 20 years, LFHS grad, approx $10k taxes. Protested my taxes and won the past two years.
What's your answer to the two questions? You might want to search my previous posts.
Stevie Janowski
9:26 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
You questions are stupid, one thats not gonna happen. Teachers are still going to come to Lake Forest and teach at a high level. I have no clue where you are getting these #s
Love2read
9:46 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
@Stevie Janowski - Fiscal Reality (scroll up) has the right answer.
If you drive just 15-20 minutes west, you'll arrive at a top notch school whose teachers teach because they love it. They don't go on strike. They don't have a union. They make about 30-40% less. They don't receive a state pension. Their retirement plan is just like every other American that works in private industry, social security plus savings and investments.
Approximately $10,000 is spent per student. This includes all teacher compensation, including retirement plans. Compare this to LFHS teachers.
The board needs to stand their ground and not budge an inch. They are more than fairly compensated already.
Had it in LF
9:47 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
The LFEA MASSIVELY overplayed its hand. First, it held its members hostage by evidently holding an open strike authorization vote- not a secret ballot- where teachers who wanted nothing to do with a strike felt peer pressure to authorize it. Even then, the Union represented that "we want this just for leverage..." Does anyone think they would have had the votes, if, say, a week ago, they asked for actual authority to strike?
Next, they based their demands on RIDICULOUS projections of massive budget surpluses that, to be accurate, would require the District's budgeters to miss their numbers- the ones that were just approved last week- by millions. The Union then refused to meet until zero hour, gambling that parents would pressure the Board to cave. Now, they post these silly videos, hoping for parent sympathy.
Here's the truth, teachers. Your community support has vaporized. We know that the militant among you- mostly burnt-out math staff near retirement- are trying to hold our best teachers hostage while you claim its for our kids. This board's comments are running ten to one against you. Our kids tell us that every teacher they talked to just before the strike and now during it loathes this action. Some are embarrassed. You are panicking this weekend, searching for a face-saving exit because you know school will soon open, and the many class teachers among you will be there to teach. In my book, any teacher that doesn't show by Tuesday should be replaced.
Rasme
11:40 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012
These LFHS teachers are NOT elite educators. They talk a big game when times are good, however character is revealed during times of adversity. These teachers (with the exception of the few who chose to cross and stand with their students) walked out on their students with seemingly no regard for the consequences. They get an F- in character and are not good enough for our children. I would much rather have a mentally tough, passionate, student focused teacher over an advanced degreed primadonna, BOE - do not give them another penny. They must be encouraged to leave so we can bring in higher caliber educators. The good news is we have the financial resources and working conditions to significantly upgrade.
Jeff
10:23 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012
BOE walked out on the students as well
Takes two to tango
RationalTht
11:18 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012
@Jeff - the BOE is representing the Parents AND the Students. What will the parents have to give up to give the teachers a SIX PERCENT RAISE IN A DOWN ECONOMY? Maybe the kid will not get the additional tutoring, maybe the kid will have to go without a medicine (as long as one side is using extreme examples, might as well go the other way as well).
One Opinion
12:33 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012
Just got home from a large community/social gathering and was extremely surprised (so much so that I had to post a comment) to find that NOT ONE ADULT PRESENT was in support of the teachers. NOT ONE! Stand strong BOE... even the non-users are eager to help out the school, and the parents/users are adding their names to the "wait list" to help if need be. I didn't expect to hear the comments that I did.
Stevie Janowski
12:49 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012
No taxpayer is in support of them. I am fairly certain the teachers create fake accounts and vote on that poll.
mshoe
1:47 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012
"these parents" cannot help out even if they want to. They have to be certified teaches for the school days to count. Get your BOE back at the table to negotiate on the points of the contract. Everyone is in support of getting the students back to LEARNING, not being babysat.
Concerned Citizen
3:33 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012
@mshoe As a parent, and having been informed at today's meeting, I am very satisfied with the plan that the administration has for the students this week. The meeting was totally focused on what was best for the students. The administration has done an exceptional job of putting together an outstanding, educational program for our students, which puts the students first. They were also very respectful and supportive of teachers, which speaks highly of their character, Principal Hoffman in particular. Trust me, the program is not about being "babysat." If all parties put as much focus on the students as the administration has demonstrated, this situation would have been resolved long ago.
Joe
8:33 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012
Teachers bullying other teachers-what a sight! What hypocrites! They tell the students not to bully each other and reprimand those that do. Then they bully those who disagree with their union's stance and want to go back to work. They should be ashamed of themselves.
Fred
8:43 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012
A way forward for teachers, students -- delivered first thing tomorrow morning, in every classroom:
Teachers: "Kids, I'm very sorry. I made a serious mistake. If you learn only one thing from me this year, let it be this: It is never right for an adult human being to intentionally harm a child."
Students: "Mr/Ms ____________, I forgive you."
Move forward, together, again.
Jeff
10:26 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012
"if you Learn a couple things from all of this, students, it's that your community does not value education as highly as you thought and are willing to put ideology over pragmatism. secondly, I hope you see how tough it is for people to stand up for what they believe in and how difficult that it. Sorry you had to see the true colors of the LF community"
Concerned Citizen
10:51 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012
@Jeff: While you are entitled to your opinion, let's be clear about the underlying assumptions to that opinion, so that everyone can judge whether that opinion is fact-based.
First, your opinion assumes that "the community" does not "value education" because it questions whether LFHS teachers' salary demands are appropriate. We value education highly, that is why we want to make sure that we have a compensation system that ensures we have the best teachers, not the highest salaries.
Second, we are not putting ideology over pragmatism. Quite to the contrary. "Ideology" would be paying whatever is demanded without carefully analyzing whether it is designed to produce better quality education. "Ideology" would also be saying we should "fire all the teachers" or "break the union." The majority of the community do not adopt any of these "ideologies." Rather, we are focusing on the pragmatic: does the compensation system reward teaching quality, not just tenure and the accumulation of degrees, and do we have the right resources in place to deliver the best education to our students.
Third, regardless of what your opinion is, I do not think it is fact-based to state or imply that people are not standing up for what they believe in. Clearly, the debate shows that people are willing to do that.
Finally, you should be clear about what you mean about "true colors" so that your intended audience can assess whether that emotionally-charged label is supported by facts and logic.
Jen
11:26 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012
Jeff, you just got schooled.
Me
8:56 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012
Union complaints:
Tiered pay structure
They want to keep Cadillac insurance plans
They want annual raises of 6%
Taxpayer solutions:
Two tiered pay scale - No. Change the pay scale and put all teachers on the new one. Then it is fair for all.
Cadillac insurance plans - Go to a menu based approach. If the teachers want to pay for the plans from their own pockets, let them.
6% raises - No. What is being offered by BoE is fair for them. We aren't talking about teachers who are living in poverty.
Me
9:26 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012
Notice to greedy Union - Now that the CPS teachers have agreed to go back to work, the media will have more time to focus on your unrealistic demands.
Steve Woz
1:09 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012
I have a couple of questions for the forum that have concerned me.
1--Why were the striking teachers able to use an LF school bus to transport them from the high school to Donati's pizza? It is walkable but would take some gas in their cars so I can see where they would want tax payers to provide the expense of the transportation but I don't see how it was justified. The buses are owned by the DIstrict I thought.. Any perspective?
2--when Harry G and the underwear photographer were in the news, the PR department of the District was right on top of it but I don't see that level of communication now. It would seem like we should be seeing Anne Whipple in the news more telling the taxpayers about the quality offer that is on the table.
mshoe
1:41 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012
The buses are being rented and paid for. Why focus on the little things. If you'r pro-BOE, get the back to the table to work it out, the teachers have been there.
Steve Woz
2:02 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012
@shoe-- your comments did not provide any new info--everything is paid for in this world. Who is paying is the real question.
A meeting is not a meeting unless both sides agree to show so this is a game for the media
Samantha Macartney
3:36 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012
Wow. This is a fun little fish bowl to observe. (LFHS Class of 1991)
Scout
3:54 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012
@shoe--who is paying for the two white vans that are also being used to shuttle teachers back and forth? Using all that gas doesn't seem very economoical or ecological. Also, I noticed the vans have been parked in the former Burger King lot all weekend. Is that legal? Can residents park their cars their overnight without getting ticketed and/or towed?
One Opinion
4:49 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012
Many parents went to the meeting today at the high school, and administration has clearly been working hard to put the needs of the students first. Lets hope "most" of the teachers return on Monday to do the same. Parents will be there to do all that they can. Dedicated teachers will hopefully cross the picket line. Most of us respect you and want you back, and for all of the teachers who do not return... happy job hunting! It is NOT an easy time right now in the "real" business world. Your Union Reps are NOT helping you and Community Members do NOT want the BOE to negotiate any more.
Another Affected Tax Payer
5:08 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012
@steve woz @scout It's my understanding the LFEA has office space there. I have no information about transport or office space costs and who's picking up the tab.
@one opinion Good to hear the outcome of today's school meeting. Hopefully, long term positive change will ultimately come about on the otherside of this ordeal.
Smooth_Operator
9:43 am on Monday, September 17, 2012
This reminds me of the baseball strike from years back.
Billionaires fighting with Millionaires and the people to gain the most are getting hurt.
Helen Walters
5:33 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
While sitting in my car, waiting for the end of the school day, a woman driving around the parking lot and pick-up line stopped next to me and asked "do you support the teachers?" My response was "I support the students." Clearly annoyed by my answer she asks "so what about your husband-does he make more than the teachers?"
hmmm...and all this time I thought the strike was not about money!?
RationalTht
9:41 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
@Helen - another thing I can guess about your husband.... he WORKS.
Mary Ann Beardman
6:29 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Parent, get your children back to school. If you support the board. then your children need to be at school. We need 100% attendance to show support and stop this insanity and unreasonable demands by the teachers!