patching...
Update: The next chapter of your community's story begins with a single voice. Yours. Blog on Patch.
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Lake Forest High School, Negotiations Both Resume This Morning

LFHS resumed Monday morning with a mandatory attendance day, negotiations resume as well

 

Lake Forest High School was a bustle of activity earlier this morning, with rows of yellow school busses, crowds of students walking in every direction — and a long line of teachers picketing on the sidewalk in front. 

LFHS resumed with a "mandatory student attendance day" this morning — with busses running and lunch being served — with a full day of programming for all students. While students will not be following their traditional class schedule, a LFHS newsletter to the parents noted that: "After extensive development by our administration and over 50 student leaders vetted the plan with our administration and concluded it would be great. We also reviewed our schedule and offerings with community leaders. They were very excited about the plans and programs." 

Related: read Patch's ongoing strike coverage here.

The school noted that the programming would be different for each class, with freshmen, sophomores, juniors and seniors following separate schedules. The school normally has around 140 teachers in the building. Today, there are 70 certified teachers (meaning not the current faculty of LFHS), over 50 volunteers assisting those teachers, 20 teaching assistants, multiple teacher's aids and the full staff of special education professionals. 

At the time of publication, LFHS did not know how many normal full-time teachers had crossed the picket line for class, but did confirm that two teachers crossed the picket-line last week. 

The newsletter noted that the Board decided to resume mandatory attendance as opposed to waiting for the strike to end (as the Chicago Public Schools are doing during their ongoing strike) because "community feedback on this issue has been emphatic - our parents expect us to open school."

The newsletter also noted that "We are trying to do what no one has ever done before. Simply put: we're working very hard to provide meaningful experiences and instruction for your children and will do it as long as we feel that it is worthwhile and meaningful for your student." 

While the school noted in a press release last week that teachers are invited back to class on Monday — but will not be penalized if they do not cross the picket line, nor will they face consequences if they do cross it — there was still a bevy of teachers marching in front of the school this morning. Their numbers have also grown, with teachers from neighboring districts, such as Highland Park, New Trier, Sherwood, Stevenson and Chicago, marching along side them in support. 

"They asked me to come march in Lake Forest this morning," noted Margaret Tower, Chicago Public School Teacher. "They supported us on Saturday, and so today Chicago is asking us to join them."

The Board has not yet responded to questions concerning how many teachers arrived to teach class this morning. 

The Board and the LFEA resumed negotiations at 9 a.m. this morning. 

For more news and updates from Lake Forest-Lake Bluff Patch, subscribe to our daily e-newsletter, ”Like” us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Related Topics: Lake Forest High School and teacher strike

John Utah

10:07 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

It's becoming increasingly clear that this is all about the money and keeping unions in a position of power against the taxpayers. It is all hands on deck for these unions. For this to happen with a 3% raise already on the table and no changes in health insurance proves this point. If you don't see this, you've been duped under the emotional guise of teachers are saints and it's all about the children.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Fred

1:45 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Is it ever right for an adult human being to intentionally harm a child?

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

11:28 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

Go Scounts! - you are a dupe.

Comment_arrow

Stevie Janowski

1:02 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

John is one of the best commenters on here. You calling him an idiot makes you look even more dumb.

Me

10:58 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

I was just looking at the teachers' website. With all the spin going on there I got dizzy and then a little bit nauseous. It is really sad how these intlligent people have imbibed of the Union Kool-Aid. What is even sadder is that they are actively burning through their goodwill with the community. Best and finals are on the table. It is now time for one of three things to happen:
i) the Union can recognize that they BOE offer is good and accept it;
ii) the BOE can act against the wishes of the community and accept the Union's demands; or
iii) the teachers can recognize that the Union is a destructive force and they can come back to work and those who want to move on are free to do so.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Smooth_Operator

11:47 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

Me

I was refering to Go Scouts! comment about John Utah, sorry for the confusion.

Smooth_Operator

11:00 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

Hey Go Scouts, is Me an idiot too??

Reply

Smooth_Operator

11:01 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

Just wondering if anyone noticed starnge people walking the picket line today?
If so they are teachers from Chicago.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mom(aka. Mother)

2:30 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

They are teachers from Stevenson, New Trier and Deerfield Highschool.

BJ Tyler

11:03 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

As a LF resident, taxpayer, and parent of a LFHS student...
- I applaud the BOE for standing strong against the uneconomic, market detached demands of the LF teachers. The teachers need to take a step back and get a better understanding of the current reality of the housing and jobs market in our community.
- I thank the volunteers, parents, and administrators who have all gone above and beyond to open the school doors this morning. Meanwhile, there are some teachers actively encouraging students to not show, and equating this to "crossing the picket line" - absolutely disgusting.
- I have tremendous admiration for Coach Spagnoli who, at great personal cost, has decided to put the interest of his players in front of his own. I just hope that the parents continue to support him - to counter the almost certain hostility of his colleagues - long after this strike is over.
- and finally, I'd like to encourage other concerned parents, residents, and taxpayers to continue voicing their opinions on forums such as this. Only by letting our voices be heard, do have any chance of ending this fiscal nightmare.

Reply

LF Resident/Parent

11:11 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

@Go Scouts, I think the name calling is not appropriate here. The BOE has tabled the tiered system for this new 3 year contract and a phase in on the health was agreed upon it appears the LFEA and that is a compromise. So that leave one remaining issue.....money.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christine Heckel-Oliver

11:57 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

Has the BOE just deferred the implementation of a tiered system? Or have they really taken it off the table? I do hope it has been removed.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

1:29 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

@Christine - EVENTUALLY, to be FAIR and in line with industry, teachers can no longer reach top pay after 20 years and retire at 55 with that pay. That is not sustainable. EVENTUALLY, all teachers need to be moved to something more realistic that has them teacher more years before they get to the highest pay possible.

Another Affected Tax Payer

11:12 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

Other teachers from different communities walking in support of the LF teachers? I wonder if they're taking time away from their classes for this?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bar

11:52 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

Today is a holiday in some of the school districts, so no classtime is lost IF other teachers are indeed here.

Comment_arrow

Jeff

4:47 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Lake forest is a bit more anti semetic tha. Other north shore communities
Jewish teachers need to use two of their three personal days to practice their religion

Comment_arrow

Me

5:04 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

@Jeff - You really are a troll. I am just trying to figure out if you believe what you write or if you just write it in order to laugh at the responses.

Hmmmm6

11:17 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

Here is something to think about. How much are we paying for this strike? Lawyers, PR, etc? How much are we really saving here? What is our long term interest here? Probably our home values, more than our taxes. If people feel Lake Forest does not support education, kiss your home values good bye. People are outraged by the salary demands, and they are a bit rich and need to come down, but let's get rid of the drama and the theatrics of post it notes and no appearances. A big part of the incentive to teach is psychic reward, and I would say that we have more than whittled at that. I just hope we can all forgive each other. Here is an interesting article about how American teachers work longer hours than teachers in other developed nations and make less here too.http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/does-it-pay-to-become-a-teacher/ Dr. A said it best a couple of days ago. It is about outcomes. Our experienced teachers are getting strong outcomes (and no I don't care if our scores are highest, they are very close)We need a compromise here that values and balances everything. The "instructional programming" was not the AP class my kid signed up for. Compelling attendance so that kids can have activities has it backwards. Education first. When adults squabble, kids lose. Let's get back to real classes with real teachers and a signed deal. Enough showboating, both sides.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ralph Keen

4:11 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

I too advocate compromise, as much as--if not more than--i did last week. The union needs to continue to negotaite in good faith, i.e. be willing to budge; and the board also needs to pursue a strategy that isn't bent on total defeat of the LFEA. The vitriolic denunciations of these teachers, and of the profession generally, that we've seen recently do not represent the consensus of the LF-LB community. I say that as a parent who cares about education and who moved here in large part because of the quality of the school. Any LFHS parent who wants to crush the teachers should ask their children how today went. (I got an earful.) We need these teachers back in the classrooms--and happy to be there--as soon as possible, in any way possible. The intransigence of 115 and LFEA is harming our kids. And parents are losing their patience ... not with the kids, but with the adults to whom we've entrusted them.

BJ Tyler

11:34 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

@Hmmmm6 wrote: "How much are we paying for this strike? Lawyers, PR, etc? How much are we really saving here? What is our long term interest here?"
- the long term interest is in producing a solution that allows LF residents to continue remaining LF residents. My annual tax bill is over 40k a year and accelerating!!!...this is not sustainable.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Pritzker

5:16 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

40,000 tax bill on a house worth 2,000,000 and you are concern about a teacher getting a 5,000 raise. We all make choices and you decided to live in 2,000,000 house. Time to downsize or pony up for your lifestyle.

Comment_arrow

BJ Tyler

5:33 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

@David Pritzker: you are a bufoon and an ignorant moron! Because I can afford to live in a 2m house, the teachers are entitled to stick their grubby little hands into my pocket and pick me clean??? While there may be some people who feel guilty for their success, I feel no such remorse. I earned every penny, and feel no compulsion to fork it over to ignorant slobs like you.

LF Resident/Parent

11:40 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

@ BJ Tyler.Personal tax burden is not the issue here. The LFEA wants more money than the board wishes and they want the money to come out of the surplus, hence their position that it wont change our tax burden. The board is trying to re-establish financial stability to the district. The last 5 year contract before the hard freeze drained the School's surplus.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Me

12:40 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

@LF Resident/Parent - I can only half agree with you. The budget and the surplus are funded by taxes. Thus, anything that depletes the surplus adds to the tax burden. The BOE is acting responsibly to control the rate of growth of the budget. Over time, taxes will continue to rise and salaries will continue to rise. However, they will do so at a sustainable rate that is consistent with the overall economy. The concept of "the money is there so your taxes won't go up" uses some seriously flayed logic. To borrow a phrase used in another post, there is no Money Fairy. The true money fairy is the taxpayer.

Comment_arrow

Jim

1:22 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

LF Resident/Parent. What's the long term interest of giving them these increases??? Are you kiding me?! Take the average salary ($106,000), take 5% a year for 20 years. It comes out to $280,000 a year. So when I'm still working into my mid-60's, a teacher from LFHS will be retiring making over $200,000 plus health care benefits. Nope, nothing wrong with that logic. When did teaching become the most sort after career position in the country.

BJ Tyler

11:49 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

@LF Resident: that is a ludicrous notion! Even if their demands were to be met through a surplus fund, how did that surplus fund come about?!?!?!? it came from my (our) tax dollars. The surplus belongs to tax payers! not the board and not the tooth fairy. Any increase in teacher comensation comes directly out of our pockets...it may or may not make a tempory layover in a "surplus" fund...but it still comes from us.

Reply

LF Resident/Parent

11:55 am on Monday, September 17, 2012

@ BJ Tyler, Yes it always comes from us, but you know that the tax rates will not be reduced by the local government bodies. They will still get us either way. But I would rather see the schools surpls restored and have the emergency funds so when the States increases the schools pension liability they have the funds to cover it. The LFEA sees the money in the budget going to surplus and they want it for themselves.

Reply

Hmmmm6

12:02 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

@Christine--I believe they are tabling it for further study so it is something that is not going to happen on this negotiation.

Reply

LF Resident/Parent

12:03 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

@ Christine The BOE have taken it out of this contract negotiation and will work with a group over the next few years on how to address the issue. Zion and HP both have a 2 tier system in place, I believe. The salary matrix/schedule has to be extended since the State extended retirement from 55 to 62.

Reply

LB Mom

12:11 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Did anyone read the post in the Gazebo News by a LFHS teacher claiming that's it's not about the money? Absurd! One of his reasons for being on strike is: "In most places in the country, teachers make about the same as the median household income of that community. In Lake Forest, teachers make half of the median household income." He's clearly forgetting to add in his guaranteed pension of $1 - $2 M (over the course of 20 years), plus his expensive medical benefits. And, just because he works in an affluent community, that should be reflected in his salary? Are you kidding me? Using his logic, the teachers of Chicago need to take a huge pay cut because their average salary is almost $20K more than the average resident. Does he really think he works so much harder than high school teachers in less affluent areas and thus deserves a higher salary? Does he really think that teachers in lower paying schools aren't as educated or experienced as he, thus deserving a higher salary? Get real teachers! If it wasn't about the money, you wouldn't be walking the picket line.

Reply
Comment_arrow

BJ Tyler

1:43 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

@LB Mom: as I continue to read the various posts in support of the teachers, I am absolutely shocked by both the weakness of their arguments and transparency of their motives. By and large, they evidence very little if any understanding of economics, finance or logic.

Comment_arrow

Me

1:50 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

I am posting this here too because the Gazebo site really isn't an open forum.

There is a solution to all of John Wanninger’s issues. If he is so aggrieved at how Lake Forest High School treats him, he should immediately seek employment at another school. By doing so he will be free of the accursed two tiered system that will take him to the top of his earnings potential at the end of his career (odd but I thought that this is how it always worked). More importantly than seeking other employment, he should get out of the way of the students who want to learn. Right now, John Wanninger is holding hostage the future of 1,700 children so that he can further his own career. Sad.

Comment_arrow

BJ Tyler

2:42 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

I find it funny how John begins his post with "This is about so much more than money"...and then proceeds to ramble on for the next 8 paragraphs about MONEY!!! In fact...I read very little in his post that was not about MONEY!

- two tiered SALARY system
- fear of being laid off and rehired at a lower SALARY
- number of years to reach top of PAYSCALE
- LF teacher SALARY vs. median community INCOME.
- how his years of experience and advance degrees should be recognized (I presume with MONEY...but please let us know if gratitude alone will suffice)

John, you want to be a bond trader? investment banker? floor trader? and earn that 350k salary? exactly who/what is stopping you?

Comment_arrow

David

6:26 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Teachers who write that they make only 1/2 of te avg LF income are not very good at math and are not telling the whole story. We know that average teacher LFHS teacher makes about $106K. Many live in households where they are not the only breadwinner so their household income is much higher. The $106K income ignores the huge value of the pension at age 55.

Median household income in LF is about 150K but that is not per individual that is for a household. Many homes have two earners.

LB median household income is about $114K. Knollwood median household incme is lower yet. Again, these are household incomes and not individual incomes.

So an individual teacher making $106K with a pension which kicks in at age 55 is doing quite well compaed to the parents of their students. A teacher married to another teacher is living in a household most likely making significantly more than the most households in our District.

The days of teachers making $15K to start while their college classmates made much more to start are long gone. Good teachers are valuable but they ones in our District are not underpaid.

LF Resident/Parent

1:25 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

@ Jim, Thank you and that is all that need to be said as to why we need and all schools will eventually have a 2 tier system!

Reply

Jim

1:47 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

This morning I dropped off our daughter at the school. I had to wait in a long line of cars (longer than normal) because the striking teachers were blocking the flow of cars into the drop off zone. They were walking across the street 20-30 at a time, slowing the progress of cars. They were also slowing the progress of the students walking to the school. The teachers could have stayed on the sidewalk between the entrance and exit to the school, but they decided to disrupt the flow of students/cars into the schoo. Nice job teachers, real mature. Yes, let's reward such behavior with a 19% increase (after three years). No, I think not. I hope the school board heard the parents at the meeting yesterday. According to the poll taken by the Patch, 78% of parents are against giving in to their demands. HOLD STRONG BOARD!

Reply
Comment_arrow

C. Kipp

1:54 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

we had no problem at drop off. Teachers were on sidewalk not obstructing anything. I think both sides are ridiculous. Don't believe every word you read from the BOE. They love to spin. I'm not saying I support the teachers. They need a reality check. But the BOE is notorious for spinning. They learned a lot from the last sup.

Comment_arrow

RationalTht

2:16 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

@C. Kipp - Jim is stating HIS experience with the striking teachers - I did not read that as an official BOE posting? Where did you get that from?

Comment_arrow

Jim

2:43 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

@C.Kipp. I stated what I experienced. I was shocked to see them acting this way. I did not spin what I saw, I just reported what I experienced. You didn't have the same experience so now you get to tell me I'm wrong. Nice try C. Kipp.

John Utah

1:53 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Those who can do, do. Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach (for $106k), picket and block traffic.

Reply

JTW

1:56 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Interesting interview this morning with Chuck Gress on WLS radio...
http://www.wlsam.com/article.asp?id=2534533&spid=17424

Teaching evidently now is a 12 month a year job.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RationalTht

2:15 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

It is a 12 month a year job with 3 months vacation. Did WLS take it easier on him that CBS where he was called out for talking around HOW MUCH the teachers were actually asking for?

Comment_arrow

JTW

2:21 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Check the link... they needled him a bit, then took a shot at LF in general ( 1% comment)

I guess what I'm wondering though is since now according to Chuck it's a full 12 month job, why did the union avoid attempts to negotiate with the BOE over the summer?

I think we all know the answer...leverage. They chose a position of leveraged self interest over the interests of the students and community.. No?

Comment_arrow

John Utah

2:21 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Well said Dan Proft:

"Lake Forest Teachers Union...gonna get all they can, because Lake Forest people can afford it - a part of the 1%ers."

THAT is the mindset we're up against LF taxpayer. Don't forget that last year Gress called us "the people who live in these big homes behind [the high school]".....http://lakeforest.patch.com/articles/lake-forest-teachers-picket-high-school

LB Dad

2:13 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

In business, if something is fundamentally flawed market forces wil correct it. That is exactly what is happening here. Stay strong BOE.

Reply

CJ

3:45 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Hi JTW,

I listened to the Gress interview on WLS. As you pointed out above, now he is defending that the teachers really work 12 months a year as they take courses in the summer (what business pays people for the time spent in going to grad school?). Of course he didn't mention that getting more grad school credits also increases their "step" on the salary schedule---automatically! He ought to try going to night school like the rest of us do in the private sector as we don't get 25% of the year off! He also stated that the "best" education is directly correlated to how much they pay their teachers. He is living in dreamland. He can't possibly believe this??

I know that I can't believe that their entire union really feels good about this whole thing. It is a huge embarrassment and shows nasty greed on the part of the union at the kids expense as they are the victims here.

BOE---continue to be strong! Let's hire permanent replacements as soon as the law permits. Considering this story has become national, you will have an outpouring of amazing resumes from other educators that want these jobs as is.

Reply

Lake Forest resident

3:55 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

I’ve been reading the comments over the past few days to get a feel for which side the citizens of LF are on. I’m glad that a majority are with the BOE, much to the dismay of some of the good teachers out there who may feel the good will between them and the community is now frayed. As for those marginal teachers my guess is that they really don’t care about the students. It’s pretty clear which teachers to reward, and which ones to remove… yet the system won’t allow this because of the union. In a highly competitive world we look to teach the next generation to develop that competitive spirit, to innovate and solve some of our most challenging problems, and when left to one’s OWN devices to find a way to come out on top. Yet somehow some supporters of the teacher’s union feel like they are teaching a valuable example to our students??? The only thing I see from the union is that choosing to leave one’s responsibilities to picket are characteristics of quitters. You quit on the students, and you quit on the community for what you claim as “fighting for something you believe in”, when in fact you are choosing the easy way out. Man-up, grow a back bone, and do what 99% of the rest of us do out there… get back to work and find a way to improve conditions on your own terms, and not behind some union boss.

Reply

BJ Tyler

3:57 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

I have a question of fact regarding the LF teachers union, their contract, and strike. Does anyone know:

At what point is the BOE legally able to fire the teachers on strike and replace them?
- what notice must be given?
- what if any legal steps must first be taken?
- would we be able to rehire some/any of the current teachers? at what wage?

I am reading a lot of posts that call for their mass firing, but exactly what legal options exist for the BOE?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Paula Skaggs

5:48 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Hi BJ!

Thanks for asking these questions. I'll look into them for you as soon as possible.

Thanks for reading Patch!
Best,
Paula

LFResident

4:18 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

As I understand.
You cannot fire someone for legally striking. There are laws and rules to follow.
The suits filed challenged the legality of the the negotiations and strike. The IELRB will rule on the merits. IMHO in this state toss a coin as to who wins. The decision in favor for the BOE could order the teachers back to work. If they do not return then they could be replaced.

Reagan was able to fire the air traffic controllers because it was an illegal strike and those who did not immediately return to work were replaced

Reply

Me

4:31 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Question: How long does it take for a Union to burn through the goodwill that has been built up over decades of cooperation?
Answer: Three days

Question: How long will it take for the bitterness to dissipate and the relationship to return to near normal?
Answer: It depends on how much longer the teachers allow themselves to be used as human shields between the Union demands and the students that the Union is holding hostage.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mosober

4:54 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Question: How many parent have explored transfer to the Academy?
Answer: More than you think.

Questions How many students fear the teachers and their attitudes upon return to the class?
Answer: All of them unless you provided cookies to the strike line.

Comment_arrow

Gary

6:41 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Question: How many years will it take our children to pay off our unfunded State employee's pensions?
Answer: Trick question. It will never happen. As long as our children have money, the unions will vote themselves larger and more generous pensions. That's what happened to our generation.

Question: How many of our children will be able to find work in Illinois, so they can stay close to home, allowing you to see your grand kids more often?
Answer: They'd be idiots to stay in Illinois.

Against Guns

5:12 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Since the teachers are on strike again this week, how often are they paid: weekly/bi-monthly? I hope these boobs realize that they aren't getting paid while striking. When will they get a wake up call and realize that teaching is more important than losing their jobs, apt, house or other fun activities?

Reply

LF Resident/Parent

5:16 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

I think today may be the first day they lose pay since it was mandatory attendance for the students.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lennie Jarratt

5:51 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

They lose pay each they they on on strike. They will make it up when they come back though. The BOE though will probably be able to dock them for not being there on mandatory days, but it is likely that will be negotiated back as well. The teachers really lose nothing (except their reputation). The children are the ones that really lose during a strike.

Smooth_Operator

5:36 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Students should stop suppling the teachers with hot cocco and cookies and tell them to stop whining because they want to learn.

I am very curious to see how they treat the students when/if they come back.

Reply

Smooth_Operator

5:39 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

What about all the student fees we as parents have paid for our children to be in sports, senior parking and other activities.

Will we get reimbursed for time lost? These are things we will never get back.

Reply

Mosober

5:44 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

How many teachers crossed the line today does anyone know??

Reply

Smooth_Operator

5:45 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Negotiation is a dialogue between two or more people or parties, intended to reach an understanding, resolve point of difference, to produce an agreement upon courses of action, to craft outcomes to satisfy various interests of two parties involved in negotiation process.

You have to have two sides, obviously we are missing a party...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lennie Jarratt

5:52 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

The taxpayers don't ever get a seat at the table and they are the ones that will pay for whatever the agreement is in the end.

Neighbor

5:55 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Yes, I did read somewhere that strikers get their salary while on the picket line. Doesn't seem right, but it must be in the contract the union put together. This whole thing is pathetic.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Smooth_Operator

5:59 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Than this is the only union that does pay when on strike.

Neighbor

5:56 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

It makes the strike even more infuriating.

Reply

James Rittner

7:12 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

>The taxpayers don't ever get a seat at the table <

From someone who ran for representative office, this is a rather astonishing statement. The taxpayers are represented by the Board, whom they elected. Hello?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lennie Jarratt

7:30 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

I've seen how the school board elections are run and how the union bosses and administration collude to make sure the unions are well represented against the taxpayers. Here is exhibit A in this arena: http://lakecountyteaparty.com/2011/05/03/crimes-corruption-and-lies-in-grayslake-d46/

Concerned Citizen

7:14 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

LFHS Striking Teachers:
During this debate, I have focused on facts and logic–insisting that others do too, recognizing points of agreement and disagreement with all sides, and expressing the majority opinion of parents and taxpayers.
One of you referred pejoratively to the community’s “true colors" and refused to explain that reference.
Today, the striking teachers have irreversibly shown their “true colors”: putting their own self interest and their union first, not our students:
1. Rather than rely on facts and logic to negotiate, they went on strike, deliberately holding our children's education hostage, solely to gain negotiation leverage.
2. Rather than provide facts when their unsupported positions are questioned, they resort to hyperbole or personal attacks.
3. Bring in teachers outside our community to picket, demonstrating that the debate isn’t about our community and our kids, but their unions.
4. Criticizing and attempting to disrupt any attempt by the district to provide alternative education to our students.
But, the striking teachers badly miscalculated: they have taken for granted parents who supported and trusted them, turning them from overwhelming supporters to overwhelming opponents. It is unlikely that support-and trust-will ever be regained.
We’re watching-our students are watching-and we will be watching more intently from now on. We demand pay for performance and call out those of you who have abused our trust and our tax dollars.

Reply

LB Mom

7:16 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

How about each side presents their best offer and we, the taxpayers, vote on which is the most reasonable. It's alarming to me that the people footing the bill don't get a say in this issue. I hope the BOE listens to the community and doesn't give in to the union demands, but who knows what the final outcome will be. Mr. Gress stated in an interview that the community is strongly behind the teachers, but I haven't seen this sentiment expressed anywhere except for a very small minority of posts here. From what I've seen, most want to start fresh with a new teaching staff unless the current teachers choose to get back to work. I realize that the Board is in place to represent its constituents, but given that this issue has become national news and can affect the reputation of our school and community, shouldn't each and every tax payer have a say in the final outcome? And, if the pressure is on to win our votes, maybe we'll see more reasonable offers presented. Just a thought...

Reply

James Rittner

7:19 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Unfortunately, you can't have a "fresh teaching staff" because of Illinois law. There is a lot of fantasizing here about firing them all and replacing them...can't happen, legally. If you don't like that, then challenge your energies towards Springfield. Striking union teachers cannot be fired in Illinois.

As for the community voting on the offers, you already have representation via your Board. Running any government body (school board, state legislation, etc) through public referendum on issues is a quick road to chaos. You elected your Board...you must live with whatever they negotiate. That's representative democracy in action.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lennie Jarratt

7:33 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Yes, research your State Rep and State Senate candidates. Choose the one who is not getting cash from the Teacher Union bosses. That is the only way this law will be changed.

If teachers want to be treated as professionals, and often compare their vital service to police and firemen, then they should also be bound by the same no strike clauses as police and firemen.

Comment_arrow

Bar

8:43 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Even if you could hire fresh faculty, would you want to? You still must establish a compensation and advancement structure. Thoughtfully recruit, interview, select, and hire each person (if they accept our compensation structure), multiplied by over 100, amazing teachers, please, to teach special needs, gifted, twice-exceptional, as well as all the learning styles of 1700 students, in academics, arts, technologies, and more. Once they're hired, the new faculty need to become familiar with the curriculae and establish raw lesson plans they can spend the next 30 years shaping to meet the changing needs of our students. Oh, and become familiar with their students -- who's doing their best, who's slacking off, who ARE they? Most of the students are in clubs, competitive groups (not just sports), performing groups. They need sponsors and coaches who know the resources, schedules, deadlines. Immediately. The sponsors and coaches need to know, who are their student leaders that they can count on? Who are the parents, staff, admins, they can call on for support? And the students: which new teachers can they trust now? Whom can they ask for a college or summer recommendation -- due just a couple of weeks from NOW, let alone from date of hire. But maybe it's a moot point: who'd want to come work where their high-level support-- a union or a BOE -- can't get things done? Or where they might be fired even if they are amazing teachers?

James Rittner

7:39 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Wow, then you REALLY don't know who on the LFHS board. I can assure you they are about the most anti-union group imaginable. Lennie, if you're going to come into this, educate yourself on the players.

People who actually LIVE in the district....back me up on this one, even if we disagree on everything else. You all know as well as I do that the current Board is majorly anti-union.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ralph Keen

7:58 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

I wish it weren't so, James, but the board has certainly given every sign of aligning itself with the more vociferously anti-union members of the community. So many of their statements in the past week have referenced the stated desires of (all) residents, yet those of us who are pressing for some form of compromise have to assume that our viewpoint isn't worth taking seriously,

Hmmmm6

7:58 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

The BOE is Anti union and anti student. Right now, very pro taxpayer. They need to balance the last two; and as Fred keeps saying, is it ever right for an adult to intentionally harm a child? (Thank you Fred for the clearest, shortest, most cogent discussion point contributed.) I think the BOE and the teachers are both doing so; they need to answer to Fred. If its ever right, it 's not right now. They are both doing it, for money. Get my kid back to CLASS, not the "instructional programming" that was the subject of lots of eye rolling and groans. Its HOMECOMING for crying out loud.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RationalTht

6:59 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Yes, it is Homecoming and that is one of the reasons the teachers chose now to go on strike - they want to extort the most amount of money possible.

The board should LOWER the next offer to the teachers to help defray some of the costs they are causing by this strike.

Another Affected Tax Payer

8:01 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

@James Rittner I believe Lennie was speaking in general terms.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lennie Jarratt

8:06 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Exactly @AATP, but that doesn't serve the purpose of someone who just wants to attack someone who they don't want around. I deal with this all the time. It's easy for people like @Rittner to attack anyone who disagrees with them.

James Rittner

8:03 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Well, it appears they've been at it for about 11 hours now. That's a good sign. I'm sure an agreement will be reached that will displease everyone...and THAT is democracy :)

Reply

LF Resident/Parent

8:11 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

LOL or the BOE made the same final and last offer and the LFEA sat there all day and never made a counter offer. Oh yeah how can you counter a final offer? Let's bring on the replacements.

Reply

Another Affected Tax Payer

8:24 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

@Ralph I've been hearing the word compromise used a lot by the union side. Define what it would mean for the teachers to compromise? It appears to be a term used as a directive to the BOE and also to soften the perception of the union. So far the only compromise I've seen is by the BOE.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ralph Keen

8:34 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

it's clear that both sides have to accommodate, and the union's refusal to budge (if that's the case) is as much a failure to bargain in good faith as the board's. yes, the BOE has made concessions, and they're to be applauded for that. but they and the LFEA have to keep working toward a mutually agreeable salary arrangement. the fact that they've been at this all day (and are still there, per the latest email) is a good sign.

Jon

8:33 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

"Adult human being who intentionally harms a child" is to "evil"
as
"Child who intentionally harms a child" is to "ignorance"

Reply

Me

8:55 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Compromise as defined by Ralph Keen: BOE continues to make concessions until the Union is satisfied that it has extracted the maximum possible value out of the taxpayer.

Bad Faith as defined by Ralph Keen: BOE sticking up for the rights of the taxpayer

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lennie Jarratt

8:59 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

That pretty much sums it in nearly all teacher unions negotiations.

Comment_arrow

Ralph Keen

9:21 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Both sides seem intent on a moral victory that can only be achieved by not budging. That's a formula for a protracted strike. It doesn't matter which side makes the next move, though my feeling is that the union has to adjust its demands. But reaching agreement, rather than the destruction of one party by the other, is still the goal of these negotiations. and I remain hopeful that it comes soon.

Me

9:06 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

The Union keeps throwing up this smokescreen about teachers leaving in droves because of the dreaded tiered pay scale. I have one question......where will they all go? If other districts are such desirable destinations, turnover there must be very low meaning that openings are scarce. so does that mean all of the teachers will simply leave and go nowhere? Please enlighten me so that I can see the flaw in this reasoning.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lennie Jarratt

9:12 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

They won't go anywhere. There is way too much competition out there for jobs. IL is ranked #1 in teacher jobs because of the salaries and perks.

The BOE must continue to keep in mind the pension shift that will most likely happen during the lame duck session right after the Nov elections. The shift, if uncapped, and it most likely will be, will escalate property taxes even faster. Once again, the taxpayers will be asked to bailout the over spending of the Springfield and local taxing bodies, especially school districts.

LB Taxpayer

9:12 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Here is a different thought - perhaps a prerequisite for running for the board is having a student either at the high school or a child who soon will be attending. I thought people who run for a school board would actually care about the school and it's future. Obviously this board has one agenda. As a taxpayer, I would pay MORE for these teachers. My kids are that important and I much rather put my money towards their future success in the hands of THOSE teachers that everyone is bashing. The school is this community's largest asset. I hope the board wakes up from their fiscal dreams, stops using the high school's website to distribute their lies and maybe think about why they ran for this elected position. It is a school, a really good one- not a mutual fund. I blame them for this loss of educational time. Too bad we can't fire them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lennie Jarratt

9:16 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

If you are going to only have parents of students running, then you should only have those parents paying the taxes.

More money does not equal better educational outcomes. This has been proven time and time again.

Comment_arrow

John

9:46 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

This is the largest asset of the community? The PEOPLE of LF and LB are the largest assets. The CHILDREN of LB and LF are the assets. And based on countless conversations that I have personally had with the parents of both communities, I have yet to hear anyone support the teachers. This is strictly a power play by the union. Look at the CPS situation. You can strike about pay but nothing else per IL law. So at the end of the day - this is only about pay increases for the best paid teachers in the state. My question stands - what are the options available to us as taxpayers? We cannot fire 'em and we cannot hold pay from them. They come back and get all back pay and raises. Is there anyone from a legal background that can tell us what we can actually do as taxpayers and voters to change this horrendous and helpless situation? We should have the power as the employer to throw them out and let them find employment elsewhere. How do we accomplish this task?

Comment_arrow

One Opinion

1:21 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

There will be openings on the Boards come April, and there should always be a balance with Board members... both users and non-users. Candidates should apply now! "Lake Forest and Lake Bluff School Board Positions Open" per the Patch and Gazebo News, and only open-minded hard-working community members should apply (in my opinion.) Like it or not, WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER :)

LB Taxpayer

9:42 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

I hope everyone heard what a joke it was at the high school today. It was insulting to our children's time. They got such push back from the kids for showing a Lake Bluff documentary, they put on a tape of an old Talent Show to appease them. My son was not allowed to go outside for lunch- why? In case the teachers might beat him up. Lake County Superintendent has deferred decision on whether today will count as a school day because it would be hard to prove there was much education. Board and Admin put your efforts into an equitable contract instead of trying to prove you can do this "without them"

Reply
Comment_arrow

One Opinion

1:26 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

While the program was not "business as usual" I am happy that our Administration is thinking outside of the usual box. APPLAUSE! I hope it is true that the striking teachers will not be paid for these days with school being "in session." THANK YOU to the few teachers who are there... where they need to be. THOSE teachers I will continue to fully support.

Comment_arrow

LFLBpet

8:22 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

I agree, LB Taxpayer! Yes, a joke yesterday and a joke today. Shame on both sides. Everyone is blaming the teachers, but how well do you really know your BOE??? They are very sneaky. They spin the truth, they spin numbers, they are not receptive to anything that is not the status quo. They have all been part of the system for way to long. In short - they are difficult to deal with. They look down their noses and think they are better and smarter than everyone. I invite all of you to attend board meetings and watch. It can not be easy to deal with them. We need a fresh, new board. People who have not been part of the board for 2 decades. Enough, already. Don't they have somewhere to be?

BJ Tyler

10:18 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

I believe there was already a pretty equitable contract put forth by the BOE; perhaps it's time for the LFEA to come back to earth and stop turning their backs on our kids.

Reply

Gary

11:29 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Once again for those people comlaining about teacher bashing. We do not have a problem with angry taxpayers venting on a website. We have a problem with teachers who refuse to accept a generous offer and who refuse to teach. The teachers own this mess. They should clean it up.

Also, someone was ripping on the BOE for not having any kids in high school. Well, I used to think the same way until I saw the petty vindictiveness of this teachers strike. There's no way a sane person would subject their kids to the possible wrath of the teachers union , so I'm good with present setup.

And if the board is so anti-union why do they bother offering any contract at all? They made a great offer to the teachers and we're getting a destructive strike for our generosity.

Reply

Gary

11:36 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

Oh yeah! I forgot to ask my usual question.

Can anyone give us a sane reason for why the teachers are striking?

The two tier stuff is off the table. They have a pay raise still on the table, while the rest of the world is going down in financial flames.

Well..................... We're waiting.

Reply

Against Guns

8:42 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

When I drove by yesterday I noticed that the teachers didn't order any high grade outdoor bathrooms. So if they have to go, do they cross the picket line and go inside? Maybe they should stop whinning - drop the signs, pickup a piece of chalk and TEACH!!!

Reply

LFLBpet

8:26 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

You all need to look at the BOE instead of always blaming the teachers. Granted, I'm not exactly thrilled with the teachers right now, either. But the BOE can be a very difficult bunch. The BOE plays games. They spin the truth and manipulate numbers. They are pompous. Unless you've ever had to deal with them or ask them for anything, you don't know what they're like. They are the ones that need replacing. Many have been there for WAY TOO LONG.

Reply
Comment_arrow

One Opinion

9:30 pm on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

i can't wait to read about the thousands of community volunteers yet to apply for the April BOE openings... those who think they have the time and ambition to do a better job. I also hope the Causus conducts open-door meetings during their interviews so we can all come and question them/those who want to volunteer for a 4-year term! Those who have been so very critical of the BOE, hope to see you all there! I'll be there if they will allow that. We need representatives that reflect the community as a whole, the entire taxed body, and not just parents. I'm a parent and a taxpayer. Thank you BOE. You are doing your best.

Leave a comment